ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
8 July 2019, 11:56 PM | #31 | |
Banned
Join Date: May 2007
Location: ASK
Watch: SubC.5711.D500
Posts: 2,236
|
Quote:
Both are stunners! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
9 July 2019, 12:37 AM | #32 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex & Patek
Posts: 1,436
|
The 5164 is truly one of the most seamless GMT’s out there. I went with the 67, but I think I just prefer minimalist dial layouts. I like the 5711 more than the 5712.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro |
9 July 2019, 07:35 PM | #33 | |
Banned
Join Date: May 2007
Location: ASK
Watch: SubC.5711.D500
Posts: 2,236
|
Quote:
That is the reason I went with the 5711 also! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
10 July 2019, 10:07 AM | #34 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: California
Watch: 26420RO
Posts: 448
|
I currently have both. I think it depends on your wrist size. I have small 6.5" wrists and the 5167 feels invisible to me, but in a great way. It is the most comfortable watch I've ever worn. I've heard that bigger guys have tried on the 5167 and thought it was too dainty.
The 5164 is thicker and has more heft. I notice it more on my wrist, I guess because of the weight. Whether that is bad or good is up to you. It does seem a bit less comfortable than the 5167. I don't think you can really go wrong with either. At this point if you can buy any Nautilus or Aquanaut at retail you must do so.
__________________
Current collection: AP 26420RO.OO.A002CA.01, PP 5164A, AP 15202BA, Omega 310.32.42.50.01.002, Tudor m79030b-0003, Garmin Epix Gen 2 Waiting for: AP 126715ST.OO.1356ST.01 Last edited by Superburrito; 10 July 2019 at 10:16 AM.. Reason: spelling |
10 July 2019, 10:16 AM | #35 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: California
Watch: 26420RO
Posts: 448
|
Below are some pics:
__________________
Current collection: AP 26420RO.OO.A002CA.01, PP 5164A, AP 15202BA, Omega 310.32.42.50.01.002, Tudor m79030b-0003, Garmin Epix Gen 2 Waiting for: AP 126715ST.OO.1356ST.01 |
10 July 2019, 04:24 PM | #36 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 3,670
|
I went from 5164 to 5167 and no regret at all. Apart from the thicker case of 5164, I find the pointer date indicator is quite challenging to read compare to the date window display on 5167. Also I prefer the simpler and cleaner dial of 5167.
As other have said. All the Aquanaut are winner and you can’t go wrong with any of them. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Watching date changes every midnight |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.