ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

e7lek · 28 July 2019, 05:45 AM

So iv been tracking my three main watches, a rolex datejust vs my black bay bronze and my navitimer 38.

The breitling gains about 8 seconds a day (bought 2 months ago)

The datejust gains about 7 seconds a day (bought about 10 years ago)

Now this is why i made this post.... is it weird that my tudor loses literally 0.5 seconds over a period of 10 days?... its so accurate im getting weirded out

The breitling im going to have demagnetized first to see if it makes a difference... the rolex is acceptable since i bought it so long ago... but wow tudor. amazing.

Thoughts?

rudestew · 28 July 2019, 05:50 AM

My Tudors are Atomic like time keepers , 1sec give or take

Onequik135i · 28 July 2019, 07:53 AM

My 2018 pre owned 58 runs at +1 with a 300 amplitude so I see what everyone is talking about in regards to accuracy.

e7lek · 28 July 2019, 02:38 PM

oh wow, i didnt know Tudor had that kind of rep on accuracy. I thought i was lucky.

mosanman · 28 July 2019, 03:12 PM

That is amazing.
The DJ will definitely run more accurately with a service however.
My 2009 Sub had its first service in Feb, was running +3 per day, it now runs at +0.75 per day.

WatchNutcase · 28 July 2019, 04:04 PM

Interesting observation since Rolex and Tudor are related?

e7lek · 28 July 2019, 10:22 PM

I came to the conclusion both my breitling and datejust are magnetized so i ordered one of those doodads for 10 bucks.. lets see if they get closer to being accurate

rolexfanforlife · 28 July 2019, 10:48 PM

My Tudor is by far my most accurate as well!

e7lek · 29 July 2019, 03:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rolexfanforlife

My Tudor is by far my most accurate as well!

Seriously considering becoming a Tudor only collector

i really am OCD with the accuracy of mechanical watches.

MSchott · 29 July 2019, 05:06 AM

I seriously doubt the Rolex or Breitling are magnetized. If they were they would run much faster than you measured. There are a lot of variables in measuring accuracy without a timing machine such as state of wind, wearing habits and resting position.

Sublovin · 29 July 2019, 05:47 AM

I think you are indeed weirded out

Art 1 · 29 July 2019, 05:57 AM

My Tudor runs about a 3 seconds fast PER WEEK.

louisshields · 29 July 2019, 06:55 AM

Tudor for me.

El Cascarrabias · 29 July 2019, 07:05 AM

My 15 year old Rolex Sub/Date (recently serviced) is running 0.2 seconds fast per day. It was running very slightly faster when I first got it several weeks ago, but over the past 28 days it's only 6 seconds fast.

Rolex vs Tudor?

I think both can be adjusted to really fine accuracy.

SPMN · 29 July 2019, 07:53 AM

My Black Bay GMT and Pelagos both run within +- 1 second a day. The Pelagos especially can be within 3 seconds/month. Just incredible accuracy out of these watches.

e7lek · 29 July 2019, 04:13 PM

Guys im still measuring my bronze and its still at exactly 0 seconds lost in 12 days.

What the hell

e7lek · 29 July 2019, 04:53 PM

Tudor BBB for sale - One hundred million Dollars

LOL

erne75 · 30 July 2019, 12:59 AM

This and my Explorer I are my most accurate watches. Consistent +2secs/day.

28 July 2019, 05:45 AM	#1
e7lek "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2019 Location: Bahrain Posts: 35	Observation: Rolex datejust vs Tudor BBB vs Breitling Navi So iv been tracking my three main watches, a rolex datejust vs my black bay bronze and my navitimer 38. The breitling gains about 8 seconds a day (bought 2 months ago) The datejust gains about 7 seconds a day (bought about 10 years ago) Now this is why i made this post.... is it weird that my tudor loses literally 0.5 seconds over a period of 10 days?... its so accurate im getting weirded out The breitling im going to have demagnetized first to see if it makes a difference... the rolex is acceptable since i bought it so long ago... but wow tudor. amazing. Thoughts?

28 July 2019, 07:53 AM	#3
Onequik135i "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Tampa, Florida Watch: 116610LV Posts: 2,566	My 2018 pre owned 58 runs at +1 with a 300 amplitude so I see what everyone is talking about in regards to accuracy. __________________ 16750 / 116610LV / 116613LB / Ed White 321 / PAM111 / PAM170

28 July 2019, 10:48 PM	#8
rolexfanforlife "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2015 Location: USA Watch: Sub Posts: 963	My Tudor is by far my most accurate as well! __________________ GS: SBGP017; IWC: Big Pilot; Omega: PO diamond; RM: 67-02 (Green); Rolex: 16710, 16520, 116509 (TMOP), 116520, 5513, 1680, 16013 (Tiffany stamped), 116610LV, 124300 x 2 (Celebration; Green), 226570 (polar) Oyster Quartz; Tag: Monaco; VC: Patrimony!

29 July 2019, 05:47 AM	#11
Sublovin 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Sep 2012 Location: USA Watch: Lots Posts: 4,594	I think you are indeed weirded out __________________ DSSD is the king of all Rolex

29 July 2019, 07:05 AM	#14
El Cascarrabias "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2014 Real Name: Frank Location: USA Watch: 16613LB Posts: 1,006	My 15 year old Rolex Sub/Date (recently serviced) is running 0.2 seconds fast per day. It was running very slightly faster when I first got it several weeks ago, but over the past 28 days it's only 6 seconds fast. Rolex vs Tudor? I think both can be adjusted to really fine accuracy. __________________ _________ <=> You really need to be, not seem to be.

28 July 2019, 05:50 AM	#2
rudestew "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2015 Location: UK Bristol Watch: DSSD SD43 Mk1 50TH Posts: 1,247	My Tudors are Atomic like time keepers , 1sec give or take

28 July 2019, 02:38 PM	#4
e7lek "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2019 Location: Bahrain Posts: 35	oh wow, i didnt know Tudor had that kind of rep on accuracy. I thought i was lucky.

28 July 2019, 03:12 PM	#5
mosanman "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2013 Real Name: Dom Location: London Posts: 263	That is amazing. The DJ will definitely run more accurately with a service however. My 2009 Sub had its first service in Feb, was running +3 per day, it now runs at +0.75 per day.

28 July 2019, 04:04 PM	#6
WatchNutcase Banned Join Date: Apr 2014 Real Name: Matt Location: UK / EU & Canada Watch: Sub 114060 Posts: 1,349	Interesting observation since Rolex and Tudor are related?

28 July 2019, 10:22 PM	#7
e7lek "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2019 Location: Bahrain Posts: 35	I came to the conclusion both my breitling and datejust are magnetized so i ordered one of those doodads for 10 bucks.. lets see if they get closer to being accurate

29 July 2019, 05:06 AM	#10
MSchott "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2019 Location: Michigan Posts: 244	I seriously doubt the Rolex or Breitling are magnetized. If they were they would run much faster than you measured. There are a lot of variables in measuring accuracy without a timing machine such as state of wind, wearing habits and resting position.

29 July 2019, 05:57 AM	#12
Art 1 Banned Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: Florida, Canada Watch: Rol/Seik/Tud/Omega Posts: 30,244	My Tudor runs about a 3 seconds fast PER WEEK.

29 July 2019, 06:55 AM	#13
louisshields "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2019 Location: NJ Posts: 12	Tudor for me.

29 July 2019, 07:53 AM	#15
SPMN "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2017 Location: St Paul, MN Watch: Tudor, Omega Posts: 1,218	My Black Bay GMT and Pelagos both run within +- 1 second a day. The Pelagos especially can be within 3 seconds/month. Just incredible accuracy out of these watches.

29 July 2019, 04:13 PM	#16
e7lek "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2019 Location: Bahrain Posts: 35	Guys im still measuring my bronze and its still at exactly 0 seconds lost in 12 days. What the hell

29 July 2019, 04:53 PM	#17
e7lek "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2019 Location: Bahrain Posts: 35	Tudor BBB for sale - One hundred million Dollars LOL

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)