ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
29 November 2019, 07:04 PM | #271 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: kent
Posts: 4
|
I dont like them, but wouldnt say trashy.
Certainly easier to come by. |
29 November 2019, 07:37 PM | #272 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: LA<>NY
Watch: Rolex♠Lange
Posts: 2,277
|
Quote:
It's a large subset of the newer generation, they need validation, internet courage, along with some cuddling. |
|
29 November 2019, 08:09 PM | #273 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Florida, Canada
Watch: Rol/Seik/Tud/Omega
Posts: 30,244
|
|
29 November 2019, 08:59 PM | #274 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: 116710BLNR
Posts: 391
|
Definitely classy
|
30 November 2019, 01:53 AM | #275 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: San Francisco
Watch: Sea-Dweller 50th A
Posts: 328
|
|
30 November 2019, 01:56 AM | #276 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: USA
Watch: All Rolex
Posts: 7,024
|
I can’t think of any Rolex watches I would consider “trashy”. You could say flashy instead but wrong adjective otherwise.
|
30 November 2019, 04:48 AM | #277 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2015
Real Name: Yuri
Location: New York
Watch: Rolex Submariner C
Posts: 1,224
|
Trashy and Rolex together doesnt compute in my brain. The two tones Ive seen are very classy. Even if a trashy person is wearing one I might say that trashy guy is wearing a nice Rolex
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.