ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
29 December 2018, 03:23 AM | #271 | |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: US
Watch: Gilt
Posts: 1,592
|
Quote:
The jubilee makes the watch and that’s what you want to remove? |
|
30 December 2018, 12:34 AM | #272 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: England
Watch: 16710, 16628
Posts: 7,757
|
Quote:
__________________
GMT II 16710 TRADITIONAL ( D- Serial #) ROLEXFANBOY P-Club Member #4 |
|
30 December 2018, 12:50 AM | #273 | ||
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: England
Watch: 16710, 16628
Posts: 7,757
|
Quote:
Quote:
Jubilee bracelets are less popular and hot-Swapping between Jubilee and Oyster bracelets has been going on a while. Rolex doesn't want people doing it anymore. Well boohoo.
__________________
GMT II 16710 TRADITIONAL ( D- Serial #) ROLEXFANBOY P-Club Member #4 |
||
30 December 2018, 01:08 AM | #274 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: ATL
Watch: 126610LV
Posts: 2,746
|
Well since the bracelets are interchangeable it also puts yet another reason for the 16710’s prices to look even more foolish.
We were originally told the 16710’s prices were increasing because Rolex no longer made a SS Pepsi GMT. When the Ceramic Pepsi came out they then said well it only comes on Jubilee and the Oyster doesn’t fit. Now that the bracelets are interchangeable what other excuse will be made to justify the insane prices of the 16710 which upon hundreds of thousands were made? |
30 December 2018, 01:29 AM | #275 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: England
Watch: 16710, 16628
Posts: 7,757
|
Quote:
__________________
GMT II 16710 TRADITIONAL ( D- Serial #) ROLEXFANBOY P-Club Member #4 |
|
30 December 2018, 01:36 AM | #276 | |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2018
Location: South
Posts: 558
|
Quote:
|
|
20 February 2019, 09:13 AM | #277 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Brazil
Posts: 92
|
The 36mm oyster perpetual bracelet fits perfectly on the BRLO using its original spring bars. And I love the brushed center links.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
20 February 2019, 09:21 AM | #278 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2018
Location: The Alps
Posts: 591
|
Very nice
|
20 February 2019, 09:34 AM | #279 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Lee
Location: 42.48.45N70.48.48
Watch: Too many to list!
Posts: 33,667
|
Looks good!!!
|
20 February 2019, 09:38 AM | #280 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: England
Watch: 16710, 16628
Posts: 7,757
|
It's the earlier WG buyer I feel for.
__________________
GMT II 16710 TRADITIONAL ( D- Serial #) ROLEXFANBOY P-Club Member #4 |
20 February 2019, 09:44 AM | #281 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Australia
Watch: @ kostastimepieces
Posts: 5,272
|
|
3 March 2019, 03:43 AM | #282 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Real Name: Tom
Location: Europe
Watch: Patek,AP,ALS,Rolex
Posts: 158
|
Sub-C bracelet fit to SS BLRO
So, what's the conclusion regarding Sub-C Glidelock bracelet fit to the BLRO?
BLNR bracelet fits to BLRO, and Sub-C bracelet fits to BLNR, so one would assume that Sub-C bracelet fits also to BLRO? Has anybody managed to do it, and if so which pins did you use? |
3 March 2019, 03:52 AM | #283 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 6,173
|
Quote:
It looks great but doesn't appear to fit well. Perhaps different springbars would help since the BLRO bars are 1.5mm and your OP are, I believe, 1.8mm. You'd need 1.8mm bars with 1.2mm pivots. That should take up the slack. |
|
3 March 2019, 07:15 AM | #284 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Member 202♛
Posts: 1,815
|
Great thread!
Here’s another spring bar comparison. SeaDweller 116600 (left), GMT 116710 (center), GMT 126710 BLRO (right). You can see the differences in thickness, as well as the spring bar depth into the lug. The 126710BLRO is the thinnest spring bar, but goes deeper into the lug. I have more images and words on the 126710BLRO at https://www.minus4plus6.com/126710BLRO.php -Sheldon
__________________
|
3 March 2019, 09:11 AM | #285 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Seiko #SRK050
Posts: 34,447
|
This has to be one of the craziest threads I've ever read.
It is an interesting development, or was at the time of this thread, but the level of excitement is rather puzzling to me. I guess it's because I'm a big Jubilee fan.
__________________
JJ Inaugural TRF $50 Watch Challenge Winner |
4 March 2019, 02:34 AM | #286 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 443
|
Quote:
It's funny you say that, as I was not initially a fan of the Jubilee when it first came out on the BLRO, however, after seeing it more and more it just looks "right" on that watch. To the point that I fail to see the benefit of putting an oyster, PCL or otherwise, on the watch. It's kind of like putting leather on an Explorer. It's fun for a while, but in the end the watch looks the best on the bracelet it came with. Take care, Ruddiger |
|
4 March 2019, 02:42 AM | #287 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Real Name: RJ
Location: UK Coast
Watch: PP/AP/Rolex
Posts: 1,358
|
|
30 May 2019, 05:30 AM | #288 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2016
Real Name: Fabio Pascua
Location: Spain
Posts: 8
|
|
2 June 2019, 04:11 AM | #289 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 194
|
Anyone tired the 97200 bracelet?
|
6 August 2019, 08:02 PM | #290 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Santa Barbarella
Posts: 6
|
The Oyster looks great!
|
6 August 2019, 08:48 PM | #291 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2018
Real Name: Jonathan
Location: NC / CA
Watch: 228206meteorite
Posts: 1,333
|
Quote:
__________________
116710blnr / 116610lv / 216750 polar / 126600 mk1 / 116500ln / 126710blro / 228206 meteorite / 126719 meteorite / Pelagos 25600 // insta @jvbphotos |
|
6 August 2019, 11:54 PM | #292 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Brett
Location: Bahrain, Dubai
Watch: Rolex and AP
Posts: 5,538
|
Quote:
I’ve had my BLNR on a Sub 97200 bracelet with the 116710 spring-bars since 2013.....perfect fit for 6 years!
__________________
Photostream on Instagram brett_in_bahrain |
|
7 August 2019, 12:57 AM | #293 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Vienna
Watch: 16710 / 18038
Posts: 262
|
|
7 August 2019, 01:04 AM | #294 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: Needham, MA
Posts: 173
|
My AD mentioned his son put a sub bracelet on his jubilee BLNR and said it looked fantastic. Anyone tried that here?
__________________
116710 LN l 16710 Pepsi l 216570 Polar |
10 February 2020, 12:16 PM | #295 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: gus
Location: East Coast
Watch: APK & sometimes Y
Posts: 26,548
|
Choices !
__________________
|
10 February 2020, 12:54 PM | #296 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2018
Real Name: Jonathan
Location: NC / CA
Watch: 228206meteorite
Posts: 1,333
|
i did it. i loved it.
then i switched it back and loved it even more. *shrug*
__________________
116710blnr / 116610lv / 216750 polar / 126600 mk1 / 116500ln / 126710blro / 228206 meteorite / 126719 meteorite / Pelagos 25600 // insta @jvbphotos |
5 March 2020, 08:54 AM | #297 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: NY,NY
Posts: 81
|
This was a really informative thread, especially as a freshly minted 126710 BLRO owner. As a kid, with zero knowledge of anything (generally speaking, but also Rolex specifically), I didn't know a jubilee from an oyster, but I often thought the jubilee was an old man's bracelet. I'll get back to that notion. What I did know, however, was that I thought the pepsi was the coolest watch ever.
On the SS subCs I bought, I saw first-hand (...) how useful/awesome the glidelock clasp is, and was surprised to find the clasp on the 126711CHNR was not like the subs. I guess I didn't really give much thought to all of those details (or maybe I just wasn't even aware these differences existed - I think I thought a clasp is a clasp and so on). When the BLRO came out, I was totally in love with it - and the jubilee. I really wanted it, and this week, I became a very grateful owner of one. Wearing it, I have to say that the jubilee is supremely comfortable. If I'm being totally honest with myself, I do wish it had the Glidelock, but the Easylink does the job just fine. My interest in this thread is more basis the fact that I'd like to have the option to mix it up. I guess that may make me less of a purist than others, but that's OK too. I'd love to have a SubC bracelet with brushed links and the glidelock clasp. I'd also like to have the bracelet from the 116710 BLNR with PCL (or from any other model that would fit, I don't care about the origin). I'd also like to have the option to put a glidelock clasp on my jubilee, if that was possible (I don't know). And I'd like to buy a few leather and rubber straps, too. Alas, I see that the RubberB band for the 126710 doesn't work with the clasp I have on the jubilee. I get that this just means a lot of money, and I'm not planning on buying all of these at once, or even retaining all concurrently. But the more flexibility I can get, the better. I guess I'll head over to the classifieds... |
5 March 2020, 08:55 AM | #298 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: NY,NY
Posts: 81
|
I should also have noted that I'd have loved to have a hidden clasp on the jubilee, too..
|
6 March 2020, 12:38 AM | #299 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: NY,NY
Posts: 81
|
Ideally, I'd also like to get my hands on an oysterflex, but not sure if they fit these watches?
|
7 May 2020, 08:27 AM | #300 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Scotland
Posts: 183
|
Ok so what was the final outcome here?
I have a 2014 batman, 2018 hulk, 2017 daytona. Which of these oyster bracelets will fit my 2019 pepsi? Or do I use the spring bars from one watch and the bracele from another? Also what bregeon tool do i need to remove the bracelets? For the people that have done this is the bracelet fully secure? Thanks |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.