ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
29 February 2024, 07:57 AM | #31 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: America
Posts: 715
|
It’s a classic if there ever was one. Many other sports Rolexes have changed getting bigger and chunkier; but not the Explorer I 36. It’s the perfect one watch collection, or even just a watch to keep forever and bond with.
|
29 February 2024, 08:06 AM | #32 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Real Name: George
Location: Cape Cod
Watch: 216570 Explorer II
Posts: 2,415
|
I've had two (36 and 39). Really liked them but finally bought an Explorer II as I travelled in different time zones for work.
|
29 February 2024, 09:06 AM | #33 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: USA
Posts: 976
|
Honestly, one of the very few current Rolex models I like and would buy. Mostly everything else has veered off too far from the classic designs and has become big and blingy. The 36 Explorer is still very close to the original while making it more study without adding bulk.
|
29 February 2024, 10:02 AM | #34 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: Sussex, U.K.
Posts: 146
|
I think it’s an absolute classic.
Understand that, despite the name, and despite a degree of evolution, the Explorer is essentially a military watch. (British not American). At one time I believe the Explorer was the suggested “private purchase” watch for new Royal Navy officers, and Rolex would supply it on an “Admiralty Pattern” strap for that purpose. Once you understand that, you understand the size, the dial, the lume, the need for the rugged movement, and the advantage of the oyster case. Once you own one you realise that although unassuming and understated, the Explorer really does represent everything a Rolex should be. Compact enough to wear every day, light enough to wear on a long march, rugged enough to undertake an expedition with, yet smart enough to wear with a dinner jacket. There is sometimes much talk about “if you only had one watch, what would it be?” Well, for me, it would probably be the Explorer. |
29 February 2024, 10:31 AM | #35 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Real Name: Kat
Location: CA, USA
Watch: 126233 Wimbledon T
Posts: 7,136
|
…your thoughts on the Explorer 36?
I love it. Cool reference, and perfect size, for me.
Kat Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk |
29 February 2024, 10:58 AM | #36 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2020
Location: US
Posts: 194
|
I’ve had mine for a little over a year. I really think it is the perfect Rolex sport model. The Submariner does nothing for me and each time I think I want to add a GMT or Explorer II to the collection I just look at my Explorer and think “ nah I’m good”
|
29 February 2024, 10:58 AM | #37 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: rolexforums.com
Posts: 5,426
|
Really appreciate everyone’s input. Can’t wait…only a couple of night shifts to go!
__________________
And ever has it been that love knows not its own depth until the hour of separation. |
29 February 2024, 11:06 AM | #38 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2020
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex & Tudor
Posts: 2,237
|
My personal experience is that the "Explorer 36" is a watch I've thought about and contemplated buying, but any time I ever saw it in person I immediately thought "wow that is way too small", and rightfully so. Were it actually 36 mm and had a less tapering and less dainty bracelet/clasp, then I would go for it.
Meanwhile, the explorer 39 is just about perfect in case, bracelet, and clasp, and explorer 40 is a close 2nd choice.
__________________
The perfect blossom is a rare thing. You could spend your life looking for one, and it would not be a wasted life. |
29 February 2024, 11:17 AM | #39 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: SC
Posts: 224
|
I could have had any of the iterations of the 36mm Explorer and chose the 114270. 20>16 bracelet, no lug holes, super Luminova and a time tested movement. Such a perfect watch.
|
29 February 2024, 11:19 AM | #40 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Real Name: Kat
Location: CA, USA
Watch: 126233 Wimbledon T
Posts: 7,136
|
Quote:
Very valid point. Everything you mentioned is why it’s perfect, for me. I have heard other guys say the same, but some say the proportions are perfect on the 36. I certainly agree with that. Kat Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk |
|
29 February 2024, 01:28 PM | #41 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2022
Location: Cali
Posts: 1,955
|
I love mine and wear it more than my Pepsi and Sub. It is legible has great lume, rugged, stylish, simple, versatile and elegant.
|
29 February 2024, 02:01 PM | #42 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Australia
Posts: 299
|
its perfect
|
29 February 2024, 02:08 PM | #43 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: The States
Watch: Cosmograph Daytona
Posts: 7,428
|
…your thoughts on the Explorer 36?
Quote:
Great post. I’m blaming you if I post an incoming of a 14270 next week. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
29 February 2024, 03:42 PM | #44 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2020
Real Name: Alex
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,664
|
So two Explorers walk into a bar and …
I love my 124273 because it is such a different wearing experience from my 40mm watches. Definitely a keeper for me. Good luck! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Submariner Date 116610LN | GMT-Master II 126710BLNR on Jubilee | Explorer Rolesor 124273 | Explorer II Polar 226570 |
29 February 2024, 09:41 PM | #45 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2021
Location: UK
Posts: 309
|
One of my favourite Rolex models , I owned 39mm version but sold as I always thought 36mm looks better ( although depends much on wrist size )
|
29 February 2024, 10:39 PM | #46 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: North Carolina
Watch: Rolex/Others
Posts: 47,587
|
I like the looks and the history of the Explorer. The 36mm/39mm/40mm all work depending on the size of your wrist and your personal preference. My wrist is 7.5-7.75 inches and I find the 36mm version to be too small for my preferences. Thinking of getting the 40mm version though.
|
29 February 2024, 11:26 PM | #47 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: United Kingdom
Watch: Rollie
Posts: 794
|
Love it, more so than my GMT and older 36mm Explorer.
The aggressive taper, which is often complained about, is fantastic and gives the case a bit more presence. To me it's more comfortable than the older Explorer despite weighing a bit more with the milled clasp and solid centre links. Definitely an outdoor adventurer's watch. |
1 March 2024, 01:59 AM | #48 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2019
Real Name: Richard
Location: Hove,GB
Watch: me prevaricate.
Posts: 241
|
|
1 March 2024, 02:13 AM | #49 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 2,698
|
I'm a big fan of the explorer 1 but the 36 is just way too small.
|
1 March 2024, 02:23 AM | #50 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2022
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 343
|
|
1 March 2024, 03:36 AM | #51 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2021
Location: somewhere
Posts: 83
|
I' d rather buy an OP 36 (green or black) than an Explorer 36. The latter ist too dainty and 19mm lug width is too small for a modern men's watch.
|
1 March 2024, 07:40 AM | #52 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2023
Real Name: Colby
Location: Chapel Hill, NC
Posts: 47
|
This is my only Rolex and I absolutely love it. I have small wrists and really appreciate the size and especially the bracelet. It feels very robust despite being so narrow and tapered. I second what others have said that it dresses up and down very well. Can be worn in any and every situation. I also like that it is unmistakable yet subtle enough to fly under the radar on an everyday basis compared to something like a 36 DJ.
|
1 March 2024, 09:28 AM | #53 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Daniel
Location: Canada
Watch: 16610, 124270
Posts: 325
|
it may be a smaller watch but makes up for it with its "dial forward" presence. If anything, it's a watch that on the surface appears plain, yet you will appreciate new things about it every time you examine it.
|
1 March 2024, 11:40 AM | #54 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2023
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: Explorer 1
Posts: 64
|
It’s pretty much the perfect GADA watch and the one and only Rolex you’ll ever need in life if that is what you’re looking for. The 36mm is a perfect size. At first might be a bit jarring if you’re used to bigger watches, but I think the taper of the bracelet is what makes it have that effect on people. After a few days you forget it and it just becomes apart of you.. disappears on your wrist until you need it. . Above all have many life adventures with it and be your own Explorer with it.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
1 March 2024, 12:46 PM | #55 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2022
Location: USA
Posts: 82
|
I would personally go for it, It's a pretty cool watch and I'm sure you would enjoy wearing it when you buy.
|
1 March 2024, 01:51 PM | #56 |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2022
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 30
|
You can't go wrong with 36, go for it.
|
1 March 2024, 06:19 PM | #57 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: rolexforums.com
Posts: 5,426
|
…just over 24 hours to go!
|
1 March 2024, 09:25 PM | #58 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 45
|
|
1 March 2024, 09:29 PM | #59 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2020
Real Name: Mitchell
Location: EST, EAT
Watch: Trusty Explorer
Posts: 1,077
|
|
1 March 2024, 11:12 PM | #60 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Real Name: Michelle
Location: Canada/Florida
Watch: WG Breguet Typexx
Posts: 2,913
|
In January I purchased a 36 mm TT version. I really like this watch a lot. I have small wrists. I’m not sure how 36 would be on a large wrist.
|
Tags |
124270 , explorer 36 |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.