ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
21 July 2010, 12:44 AM | #31 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,551
|
Both really nice!
|
21 July 2010, 02:07 AM | #32 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 582
|
Bezel finished in green/black on the gmt would be awsome.
I prefer the look of the sub c but the functionality of the gmt But if the gmt c was a pepsi ........ Well that's a totally different thing I think both watches look too similar at present |
21 July 2010, 02:13 AM | #33 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Real Name: Louie
Location: California
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 644
|
Used to adore the GMTIIC from afar, up until I saw & tried on my friend's. Now I hope to get a SubC when all the excitement has quiet down. I am still in love with my GMT Pepsi, though.
|
21 July 2010, 02:25 AM | #34 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Real Name: Tom
Location: Switzerland
Watch: too many
Posts: 1,150
|
Quote:
I was thinking the same as you- until I saw the Sub C in flesh! I like the vintage style, too, but IMHO Rolex had to do something to modernize their models....and I think they made the best without loosing the classic look of a Rolex-well done! Look at it, and I am pretty sure you will change your mind. BTW, if you go back in Rolex history to the 30's and 40's, I think they had similar squared casings on their famous bubble back models....didn't they? Anyhow, I am happy with my new Sub, Rolex has made a masterpiece which is contemporary modern and classic at the same time. Regards Tom |
|
21 July 2010, 02:30 AM | #35 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Real Name: Bryan
Location: Oregon
Posts: 7,399
|
I think I'll keep the classic SUB and go with a II-C eventually so I can have the new clasp, dial, bezel, case....
__________________
Rolex / Panerai / Omega |
21 July 2010, 03:37 AM | #36 |
Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: Mark
Location: United Kingdom
Watch: 16610 & 116710LN
Posts: 559
|
I like both but the Sub is more of a classic so I lean that way :)
M |
21 July 2010, 03:43 AM | #37 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: USA & France
Posts: 11,078
|
Both are nice/great, neither on par with the Deepsea! :-) If you are into that sort of thing, that is!
|
21 July 2010, 03:44 AM | #38 |
Fondly Remembered
Join Date: May 2005
Real Name: JJ
Location: Auckland, NZ
Watch: ALL SOLD!!
Posts: 74,319
|
__________________
Words fail me in expressing my utmost thanks to ALL of you for this wonderful support during my hour of need!! I firmly believe that my time on planet earth is NOT yet up!! I shall fight this to the very end.......and WIN!! |
21 July 2010, 03:46 AM | #39 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: FL
Posts: 1,081
|
The GMT ll C has it all. The best of all the Rollies combined IMO.
|
21 July 2010, 04:00 AM | #40 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Real Name: Tom
Location: Belgium-temporary
Watch: 16610&116610LN
Posts: 37
|
|
21 July 2010, 04:15 AM | #41 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: The Moon
Posts: 1,238
|
|
21 July 2010, 04:30 AM | #42 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Peterborough
Posts: 9,631
|
|
21 July 2010, 04:33 AM | #43 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Arizona
Watch: EXP2-42, DJ2, SMPO
Posts: 347
|
|
21 July 2010, 04:46 AM | #44 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Timo
Location: Helsinki
Watch: 116710LN
Posts: 59
|
I think the new SS SubC is definitely cool. SS GMTIIC, however, is the perfect watch. I'd like to own them both, but since I am a single watch guy, I go with the GMTIIC.
|
21 July 2010, 05:10 AM | #45 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Real Name: Martin
Location: PA, US
Watch: GMT 16700 Pepsi
Posts: 7
|
love em both, wonder how long these will be around before the next change....
|
21 July 2010, 06:56 AM | #46 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Europe
Watch: 116718 green
Posts: 1,944
|
Quote:
Both look ugly to my eyes. Remind me of zodiacs
__________________
|
|
21 July 2010, 08:12 AM | #47 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: Sala hu din
Location: N/A
Posts: 1,778
|
Gmt cooler for me + useful
|
21 July 2010, 08:25 AM | #48 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: here
Watch: me
Posts: 44
|
no controversy GMT is COOOOOOOOOOLER
|
21 July 2010, 08:26 AM | #49 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 582
|
GMT needs blue lume LOL
|
21 July 2010, 08:34 AM | #50 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Scotland, UK
Posts: 444
|
Both too tarted up tho GMT probably works better in the new style.
|
21 July 2010, 08:35 AM | #51 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Real Name: Joe
Location: Bloomfield, MI
Watch: Submariner
Posts: 467
|
GMT-Master IIC is clearly superior. The added functionality of the 24-hour hand really makes this a no brainer.
Obviously, the Submariner is a glorious watch as well, AND the glide-lock clasp, the larger crown, are awesome. I'll take both please.
__________________
Hooper: Watch it! Damn it, Martin! This is compressed air! Martin: Well what the hell kind of a knot was that! Hooper: You pulled the wrong one! You screw around with these tanks and they're going to blow up! |
21 July 2010, 08:41 AM | #52 |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Arizona
Posts: 386
|
One is a divers watch and the other is very useful for travel or to track another time zone. I have both a sub LV and a GMT IIc. Each does what it was made to do in a way that makes them classics.
|
21 July 2010, 08:51 AM | #53 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: George
Location: Seattle
Watch: One of Them
Posts: 6,924
|
The GMT II is a beautiful watch. It is much more interesting than the sub with the fourth hour hand. However, I find the bezel is just dumb as a carryover from the original GMT before the hour hand could be changed independently from the 24 hour hand. The bezel looks very cool, but what is its function, like we really need to monitor a third time zone? I understand it can be used a pseudo timer like a sub… please no hate mail. A fixed bezel like the Exp II just makes much more sense. Also, not a fan of polished links, and it would hurt me to brush the links as it just seems well….wrong……yet right…wrong, right. You see, I would be conflicted. These are minor problems, and with that beauty I can see past these minor quibbles. Like the saying goes, I wouldn’t kick it out of bed for eating crackers.
As for the Sub C. I’m reserving my opinion until I see one in the flesh; however, it should be the nicest sub……ever.
__________________
|
21 July 2010, 11:19 AM | #54 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: HaNgat
Location: Jakarta
Watch: Sports Rolex
Posts: 648
|
Both are indeed great watches but sub c price is much more expensive than gmt ii c. Functionality gmt ii c has more. Got my gmt ii c and sub date so won't be thinking about sub c for a many while I guess.
__________________
Cartier Tank / Suunto Stinger / 16014 / 16610LV / PAM 233 / 116520 / 14060M / 16710 / Omega Constellation |
21 July 2010, 11:31 AM | #55 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: PA
Posts: 1,034
|
|
21 July 2010, 12:40 PM | #56 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: san francisco
Watch: gmt2c pam372
Posts: 842
|
If I could justify the expense, I'd own both...but I'm sticking with the GMT.
|
21 July 2010, 01:21 PM | #57 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Jeff
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 39
|
I am with Mic6 but still reserving judgement before I see the sub-c supercase in the flesh. I am glad I have my now "collectable" 16710 and 16610...
|
21 July 2010, 01:53 PM | #58 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Midland, TX
Watch: Rolex Submariner
Posts: 6
|
Love my Sub!!!
|
21 July 2010, 03:46 PM | #59 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: Sub C,GMT,Daytona
Posts: 13
|
|
21 July 2010, 03:58 PM | #60 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Real Name: MDangerSteel
Location: Canada
Watch: Vintage Rolex
Posts: 2,301
|
Im partial to the GMT.However they both look wicked, and .............kinda similar.Bet my wife wouldnt know an better if I went out and bought the new sub, I could just pass it off as "Oh I've had this one for a while, Hun" watches.....muahaha.
__________________
Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons Probability of survival is inversely proportional to the angle of arrival---Capt. Rage Don't believe anything in aviation, 'till V1---Mitch Danger Steel |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.