ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
28 August 2010, 03:29 PM | #31 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: NYC
Watch: ya mawt!
Posts: 3,448
|
I always have the seller open the watch for inspection before I buy.
|
28 August 2010, 03:44 PM | #32 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Real Name: Martin
Location: Hertfordshire UK
Watch: Platinum YM
Posts: 32
|
Not sure I like the idea of cracking the case back off and possible compromising water resistance, but then I really wouldn't want a fake either.
I have have no real interest in vintage watches, so I try to only buy watches with box and papers. Would you guys still feel the need to see the movement on newer models where you can match serial numbers with the paperwork? |
28 August 2010, 04:15 PM | #33 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: George
Location: Seattle
Watch: One of Them
Posts: 6,924
|
First, I've bought the watch. I'm not taking it back unless something is horribly wrong. When I buy off the boards, I'm not expecting Nortstroms, but I am expecting everything to be as it should. I do take the watch to my watchmaker. He will report if there is oil in the capsules, rotor end play, and timing. If it is dry (no oil in capsules) I will have it serviced. I do this even if I intend to sell the watch.
Selling your watch because you want someone else to pay for the service is irresponsible. Irresponsibility always catches up with you. It is entirely another thing if you come clean. Someone else may want to do the service as the service warranty will be in their name. For example I did a straight trade of an SD for a PAM 177. My watch needed service so I wrote a check for $350.
__________________
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.