The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 3 February 2011, 11:49 PM   #31
Dr.B
"TRF" Member
 
Dr.B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Real Name: Fernando
Location: North Carolina
Watch: SS White Daytona
Posts: 1,944
They just didn't want you to strain while turning it...
__________________
The real voyage of discovery consists not in seeking new lands but seeing with new eyes.
—Marcel Proust
Dr.B is offline  
Old 3 February 2011, 11:53 PM   #32
Ebruner
"TRF" Member
 
Ebruner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Kentucky
Watch: 118208
Posts: 2,510
Quote:
Originally Posted by rolexsubdate View Post
On a watch like this, it should have been tighter. Tighter and more rigid would have better suited it ....a bezel that rotates
this easily, gives the entire watch a very toy like feel ....roatating the bezel ruins what ever heft the watch has ....
kind of like most guys in the gym .... huger muscular upperbodies but chicken legs...
How many dives have you logged with all those watches to form those opinions?

-Eddie
__________________
Ebruner is offline  
Old 3 February 2011, 11:54 PM   #33
Jonathan007
"TRF" Member
 
Jonathan007's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: Jon
Location: ENGLAND
Watch: #296
Posts: 792
His opinion I suppose.

Excellent time piece in my book.

__________________
Seiko all original 6105-8119
Jonathan007 is offline  
Old 3 February 2011, 11:55 PM   #34
rolexsubdate
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: The Moon
Posts: 1,238
It is a great watch but I bet you more guys would like it if theirs was stiffer .... I mean their bezel on the DSSD ...am I right or am I right

The new ball bearing technology has taken a little bit of machismo out of it ...
Plus had it turned a little more stiffly, it would have given the owner a psychological feel that this bezel is designed to track your dive time and your life depends on it ....that's why it is stiff and takes a little more force because a lot is riding on it ....
rolexsubdate is offline  
Old 4 February 2011, 12:00 AM   #35
Ebruner
"TRF" Member
 
Ebruner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Kentucky
Watch: 118208
Posts: 2,510
Way too sissy.


-Eddie
Attached Images
File Type: jpg PB250008.jpg (80.3 KB, 98 views)
__________________
Ebruner is offline  
Old 4 February 2011, 12:01 AM   #36
rolexsubdate
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: The Moon
Posts: 1,238
Quote:
Originally Posted by bayerische View Post
Water pressure won't change the resistance, since water pressure on the bezel will come from all directions onto the bezel...
Water pressure is strictly from top down, not from the sides. There is some nonzero side pressure but watches are designed to take pressure from above that directly impacts the crystal ....

If water pressure came from all directions, it will cancel each other out .... then a 20cent mickey mouse watch would survive the same depth as the $7000 DEEPSEA .....so why not just take the mickey mouse watch down there?
rolexsubdate is offline  
Old 4 February 2011, 12:09 AM   #37
bayerische
"TRF" Member
 
bayerische's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Andreas
Location: Margaritaville
Watch: Smurf
Posts: 19,879
The pressure on the bezel comes from all sides. Water gets in at the back of the bezel too, between the actual case. Just like on the human body, it's not cancelled out, it's still there, but it doesn't make resistance to move something higher.
__________________
Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man.
bayerische is offline  
Old 4 February 2011, 12:12 AM   #38
bayerische
"TRF" Member
 
bayerische's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Andreas
Location: Margaritaville
Watch: Smurf
Posts: 19,879
Rolexsubdate you are not comprehending what I'm saying. Water pressure does come from all sides... It's not about canceling out, that can't be done...

The mickey watch fails because it can't resist the pressure from the water.
__________________
Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man.
bayerische is offline  
Old 4 February 2011, 12:17 AM   #39
Ebruner
"TRF" Member
 
Ebruner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Kentucky
Watch: 118208
Posts: 2,510
Quote:
Originally Posted by rolexsubdate View Post
Water pressure is strictly from top down, not from the sides. There is some nonzero side pressure but watches are designed to take pressure from above that directly impacts the crystal ....

If water pressure came from all directions, it will cancel each other out .... then a 20cent mickey mouse watch would survive the same depth as the $7000 DEEPSEA .....so why not just take the mickey mouse watch down there?
You don't have a very good comprehension of pressure at depth. You may want to stop before you make yourself look any less informed.

-Eddie
__________________
Ebruner is offline  
Old 4 February 2011, 12:31 AM   #40
OLJR
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: Oliver
Location: Qatar
Watch: GMT-Master II
Posts: 260
I guess that the important thing is that there is sufficient resistance in there to make sure that the bezel does not turn too easily of its own accord.
OLJR is offline  
Old 4 February 2011, 12:36 AM   #41
rolexertion
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Montreal, PQ
Posts: 722
So the older guy goes to the doctor and says, while raising his arm, 'It hurts if I do this'. The doctor says, 'Don't do that'.

Realistically, if the bezel is too loosey-goosey, leave it alone. If it took you six months to notice it, you must not have much occasion to use it.
rolexertion is offline  
Old 4 February 2011, 12:44 AM   #42
rolexertion
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Montreal, PQ
Posts: 722
Quote:
Originally Posted by rolexsubdate View Post
Water pressure is strictly from top down, not from the sides. There is some nonzero side pressure but watches are designed to take pressure from above that directly impacts the crystal ....
Wow. That's amazing. I did not realize that. I guess if you're diving at 7,000 feet you had better be very careful not to tilt your wrist over to the side. And hydraulic brakes only work if the lines run in perfectly straight paths from the master cylinder to the brake pads.

Just to be clear, your post was sarcastic humor, right?
rolexertion is offline  
Old 4 February 2011, 01:19 AM   #43
dalip
"TRF" Member
 
dalip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Real Name: Dalip
Location: Mumbai and Perth
Watch: Rolex PAM Omega
Posts: 18,656
Quote:
Originally Posted by The GMT Master View Post
I would disagree, I think it feels refined, that thing moves silkily smoothly. It feels like it's been overengineered, just like every other aspect of the watch
Exactly how I feel about mine.
__________________



------------------------------------------------------------
"The liar's punishment is not in the least that he is not believed, but that he cannot believe anyone else." George Bernard Shaw
dalip is offline  
Old 4 February 2011, 01:58 AM   #44
cr6man
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: harry
Location: left coast
Watch: mickey mouse
Posts: 490
Quote:
Originally Posted by directioneng View Post
Sissy Rolexsubdate should feel how smoothly the cylinder spins on a 44 magnum.
UH,OH....you said "44 Magnum" Yah. it DOES kinda feel like my S&W 44.....
cr6man is offline  
Old 4 February 2011, 03:59 AM   #45
Hypermotard
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Newfoundland
Posts: 20
It is the perfect ratchet mechanism with a very refined sound almost like a dupont lighter or a safe in the movies :)
It does the watch justice and it sounds like there is more going on than just a ratchet spring like in other professional models.
It feels like there was some serious engineering invested unlike the 1 cent ratchet spring in our older models.
My 2 cents
Hypermotard is offline  
Old 4 February 2011, 04:02 AM   #46
dnagwhogas
"TRF" Member
 
dnagwhogas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: MauiBacerdo
Location: Chicago
Watch: N :Learn
Posts: 902
Quote:
Originally Posted by jessiethe3rd View Post
Please send me that sissy watch and I'll train it to be a man on my wrist... bear in mind it's an extensive program - time frame for full completion of my program is 1 - 2 years.
LOL....HILARIOUS!
__________________

P-Club Member # 7

Time is what prevents everything from happening at once.
dnagwhogas is offline  
Closed Thread


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.