ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
15 April 2011, 12:39 AM | #31 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: anywhere but here
Posts: 690
|
Please don't. You would look like you stolen some boy's watch to wear.
|
15 April 2011, 12:41 AM | #32 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Bay Area, Ca
Watch: 116400GV
Posts: 834
|
|
15 April 2011, 12:47 AM | #33 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Phil
Location: CA
Posts: 5,374
|
Its all a matter of personal preference.
However, I have not seen the DJII on a wrist for a while and somehow at 41mm (and I wear 35-45mm) the DJII lost some of that "Datejust-ness." Maybe I am just old school. +1 on DD...
__________________
too much into watches... |
15 April 2011, 12:56 AM | #34 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 392
|
You won't have a problem at all. I have a 7 inch wrist, and I wear an EX I almost daily. It's all in what you get used to. Now when I go back to my Subs or my SD, they feel big. Honestly, I think the DJ II looks too large.
__________________
|
15 April 2011, 12:59 AM | #35 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 392
|
Looks much better than the DJ II.
__________________
|
15 April 2011, 01:13 AM | #36 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Florida USA
Posts: 26
|
I thought a 36 would be too small for my 7 1/4" wrist but when I slipped it on the first time it felt like a 'natural'. But my 36 is a vintage yg dd with a presi braclet so I think a big part of the size has to do with the feel including the 'heft' of the 70+ gram bracelet.
|
15 April 2011, 01:20 AM | #37 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: South Carolina
Watch: Panerai 914
Posts: 6,540
|
Yes, it is too small for you. Women and children everywhere will be laughing at you..............................................j ust kidding.........it will look better than the DJII in my opinion.
|
15 April 2011, 01:53 AM | #38 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Southwest
Watch: R O L E X
Posts: 1,188
|
Agree 100%.
__________________
Just a Matter of Time |
15 April 2011, 01:54 AM | #39 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Dennis
Location: Bay Area - 925
Posts: 40,018
|
Try one on and see...
__________________
TRF Member #6699 (since September 2007) |
15 April 2011, 02:17 AM | #40 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,830
|
The perception that a watch is too small is often based on fashion trends and not on reality. In the past, watches as small as 27mm across were worn by men with wrists much larger than mine (6.75" or so) and were not considered effete. The length from lug-to-lug is also important. Personally, I would never wear a watch which extends in lug length beyond the confines of my wrist -- it would just look silly. I own a few 40mm watches (a couple of Subs, GMT 16750), but none larger.
Here is a Hamilton Lexington (27mm) on my wrist, a model which was likely worn by many officers in WWII: And a 1956 Datejust (6605):
__________________
Cheers, Adam |
15 April 2011, 02:23 AM | #41 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Real Name: KL
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: Explorer II Black
Posts: 1,480
|
Very true Adam
. Quote:
Leaving asides dress watches (which I like a lot), 34-42mm would look normal/good on most wrists. |
|
15 April 2011, 02:31 AM | #42 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: at home
Posts: 1,330
|
7 inches is the perfect length to fit for sporty Rolex.
|
15 April 2011, 02:32 AM | #43 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Bob
Location: U.S.A.
Watch: 1655
Posts: 63,999
|
Have you seen photos of Tom Selleck & Clint Eastwood wearing 36mm DJ's?
Looks ok on their wrist.
__________________
Founder & Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons |
15 April 2011, 02:38 AM | #44 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: planet Earth
Posts: 93
|
I own a DD and DD II, and strongly prefer the DD II. With today's styles, the 36 mm is perfect for a woman's wrist, but too small for a man's wrist, IMHO.
|
15 April 2011, 02:58 AM | #45 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Real Name: Bryan
Location: Pacific Northwest
Watch: YG DD lchdp
Posts: 2,963
|
I think that the 36mm looks better in formal settings than the 41mm, but I'm biased ;)
|
15 April 2011, 03:10 AM | #46 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: Charles B
Location: GMT -7
Watch: Hulk 116610LV
Posts: 6,131
|
36mm is an absolute classic size for the Datejust. I think it is more versatile and will be more timeless in the future.
__________________
Hulk 116610LV + GMT II 126710 BLNR + Explorer 124270 + Air King 126900 + Submariner 16613LB |
15 April 2011, 03:16 AM | #47 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Alvin
Location: So Cal
Watch: ROLEXES
Posts: 5,390
|
James Worthy wears a 36mm DD and it looks weird on him. It should be perfect on you unless you're 6'10 with 8.75inch wrists.
__________________
"A thing of beauty is a joy forever"............John Keats |
15 April 2011, 03:45 AM | #48 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Real Name: Adam
Location: Orlando, Florida
Watch: Me
Posts: 9,935
|
I would say it would look just fine... That being said I prefer to not go smaller than 40mm myself as well. I do like a particular DJ however so I may be right there with you
__________________
The richest people in the world look for and build NETWORKS, Everyone else looks for work... Robert Kiyosaki |
15 April 2011, 06:32 AM | #49 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: London
Posts: 419
|
|
15 April 2011, 06:51 AM | #50 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Peterborough
Posts: 9,631
|
|
15 April 2011, 08:25 AM | #51 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex Explorer I
Posts: 10,278
|
Wear what you like...
|
15 April 2011, 08:29 AM | #52 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Manalapan Florida
Watch: Tridor Masterpiece
Posts: 2,819
|
You're DJII looks awesome, and so would the DD .. Post a pic if you get the DD
|
15 April 2011, 09:05 AM | #53 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Real Name: Eric
Location: San Diego, CA
Watch: GMTIIC
Posts: 605
|
My wrist is 7.25" and I love to wear my 36mm DJ. Looks perfectly proportioned to me.
You can also ask M&M and Pele, both wearing 36mm DJs or DDs. I also had a pic of Tony Soprano with a DD, but it won't upload for some reason. (Thanks to Jake's Rolex Magazine www.rolexmagazine.com for the pictures)
__________________
116234 | 116710 | OMEGA 2551.80 | Reverso GMT |
15 April 2011, 09:57 AM | #54 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,458
|
Thanks for all the great help guys. I have decided to go ahead and get one but am stuck between two dials http://rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=172096
BTW I thought that pic of Pele was Bill Cosby when I first glanced at it LOL |
15 April 2011, 11:27 AM | #55 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: David
Location: australia
Posts: 20,215
|
36mm will be back in style before you know it, larger watches will come and go as they have before, 36mm allows for the perfect proportions rolex is famous for IMHO
|
15 April 2011, 11:33 AM | #56 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2010
Real Name: Roscoe
Location: florida
Watch: 16618
Posts: 646
|
|
15 April 2011, 11:49 AM | #57 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 921
|
Personally...
I think a lot has to do with a person's attitude. If you feel good wearing it, it will look good on you. If you are uncomfortable and self conscious wearing it then don't bother. Remember, you are wearing the watch for you, not the rest of us.
__________________
Keith |
15 April 2011, 01:55 PM | #58 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: Roger
Location: Toronto
Posts: 604
|
People might think 36mm is small for a large wrist. I think a YG DD has a more prominent presence than typical SS because of the deep gold tone. 36mm will feel just right. DD II would be too large too bling for most people.
__________________
116610LV Tudor 79190 Seiko MM300 Seiko SDGM001 |
15 April 2011, 06:05 PM | #59 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Real Name: Richard
Location: Europe
Watch: The one I have on
Posts: 273
|
Quote:
p.s. sorry for low quality cell phone photo.
__________________
14060M - 16610 - 16710 - 16234 - 16570(x2) - 116400GV - IW323300 - PAM292 - SKX779K |
|
15 April 2011, 06:09 PM | #60 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 578
|
I think it'll look good.
__________________
__________________________________________ "I'm a man of simple tastes, easily satisfied with the best." |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.