ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
17 September 2011, 01:14 AM | #31 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: George
Location: Athens, Greece
Watch: es --> A lot !
Posts: 2,327
|
You are welcome
Back to the SD. You have a good watch there. Try to take the proper steps as to service it, and focus on the target to make it operable for daily use. Do not run after the feet of depth. Are you ever going to go that deep ever ? 30 to 40 m is the most you will need unless you dive professionally. Do not let them confuse you. Too much analysis, leads to paralysis.
__________________
Rolex owner since 1971. 5513 and 16700 the loved ones. DJ WG Jubilee 16170 for wife - U series Oyster Perpetual WG 177234 for daughter V-series |
17 September 2011, 03:39 AM | #32 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Real Name: Duncan
Location: UK
Watch: Lots
Posts: 443
|
Quote:
__________________
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - "The quality is remembered long after the price is forgotten" - Sir Henry Royce (1863 -1933) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - |
|
19 September 2011, 12:21 AM | #33 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Cheshire - UK
Posts: 24
|
Actually, I might have ruined the old look thing, but I love the way it looks now and Im never likely to sell it so hey ho? Having not known too much about this before it went to Rolex, I was guided by them which I now know isn't something you should do if you want your watch to stay original. Tried uploading a pic but was unsuccessful.
|
19 September 2011, 12:34 AM | #34 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Cheshire - UK
Posts: 24
|
|
19 September 2011, 12:42 AM | #35 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Cheshire - UK
Posts: 24
|
|
19 September 2011, 02:47 AM | #36 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: gus
Location: East Coast
Watch: APK & sometimes Y
Posts: 26,551
|
__________________
|
19 September 2011, 05:11 AM | #37 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Kayvan
Location: Paris
Watch: Explorer II 216570
Posts: 195
|
|
19 September 2011, 09:00 PM | #38 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Cheshire - UK
Posts: 24
|
|
20 September 2011, 06:33 AM | #39 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Cheshire - UK
Posts: 24
|
Thanks Roro, I'm really pleased with it
|
20 September 2011, 06:46 AM | #40 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: gus
Location: East Coast
Watch: APK & sometimes Y
Posts: 26,551
|
sorry, your watch looks great
im not over the time RSC did it to me, AND those horror stories you hear every now and then when they alter the truly vintage stuff... gives me chills. there is a thread here about a AD swapping out a highly collectable dial.... customer didn't know any better.... he got a quick education here and with some serious nail biting aside, he eventually reacquired his original parts from the AD. it would just be appreciated if RSC would explain or hand out a pamphlet to educate and allow for an informed decision, before they alter an original watch. best of luck with your improved watch and enjoy the functioning lume as long as shes seeing wrist time, its all good!
__________________
|
20 September 2011, 11:08 AM | #41 |
TechXpert
Join Date: Jun 2009
Real Name: Rik Dietel
Location: Seminole Fla
Watch: 5512 s/s Sub
Posts: 1,818
|
Well first of all if your watchmaker has a Rolex parts account the crystal is available I stock 1/2 a dozen myself so it shouldn't have had to go where it went. Stainless steel does pit and rust but rarely on that part of the watch usually on the case back and where the gasket seats on the case. The case itself if it has to be replaced should be less than 1 thousand dollars. Rikki
__________________
Century 21 Certified watchmaker Omega Service Provider Trained Omega OWME Certified. Rolex Parts Account Holder. |
20 September 2011, 11:34 AM | #42 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Real Name: Brian
Location: CA dreamin'
Watch: ing the market.
Posts: 5,906
|
I'm sure the corrosion that they are referring to is pitting where the glass meets the case and/or at the gasket. That's external corrosion, and would explain why it was not detected by your guy and why they refuse to pressure test it. It may pass today, but the pitting precludes them giving it a 2 year warranty. I wouldn't sweat it. But, I wouldn't take it back into the ocean or pool either.
__________________
-Brian AUDENTES FORTUNA IUVAT 十人十色 |
20 September 2011, 09:05 PM | #43 | |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Cheshire - UK
Posts: 24
|
Quote:
|
|
20 September 2011, 09:09 PM | #44 | |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Cheshire - UK
Posts: 24
|
Quote:
The first thing i did when I got it back from Rolex was to have it pressure tested. The 2nd thing I did was go for a nice swim!! |
|
21 September 2011, 05:46 PM | #45 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Kayvan
Location: Paris
Watch: Explorer II 216570
Posts: 195
|
Hi T1MWV,
Concerning pitting, I think it also has to do with perspiration/dirt from wearing a watch and not just water. Just curious, did they replace the date wheel or does it have its original "open sixes and nines" date wheel? Kayvan |
21 September 2011, 07:58 PM | #46 | |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Cheshire - UK
Posts: 24
|
Quote:
They say the pitting was down to moisture sitting behind the seal. What ever!! ?? Tim |
|
21 September 2011, 09:55 PM | #47 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: The Alps
Posts: 408
|
So if I get it right, They took the valuable original dial, hands, and wanted to take your case with the rare triple 6 reference. Then they charged you how much for all that?
Congratulations, you've been raped. That said they are getting sloppy for forgetting your open six date wheel. They did not forget that on my 16800... |
21 September 2011, 11:19 PM | #48 | |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Cheshire - UK
Posts: 24
|
Quote:
Well and truly done!!!!! |
|
21 September 2011, 11:29 PM | #49 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: W. Stutman
Location: Motor City
Watch: TT GMT IIC
Posts: 2,223
|
Thank you for posting this.
|
21 September 2011, 11:56 PM | #50 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: gus
Location: East Coast
Watch: APK & sometimes Y
Posts: 26,551
|
Quote:
i just got a New "case frame" for a submariner, i can assure you it was well over 1 thousand dollars.... as the OP said, closer to 3 thousand dollars.
__________________
|
|
24 September 2011, 05:19 AM | #51 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Cheshire - UK
Posts: 24
|
The insurance company have opened the claim again which is positive in a way however im stuck between a rock and a hard place. If they pay out I get a watch thats going to be waterproof but I lose the 16660 case if they dont pay out, i retain the original case but Rolex dont deem it to be waterproof??? Which one devalues the watch more?? If i ever came to sell it surely anyone would be put off if Rolex black mark it with their 'Dustproof' comment even though its pressure tested to 656 feet? Any of your thoughts would be valued please.
|
24 September 2011, 06:15 AM | #52 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Kayvan
Location: Paris
Watch: Explorer II 216570
Posts: 195
|
Definitely try to keep the original case if you are ever planning to sell the watch. A 666 with a service dial and hands is one thing (less desirable for a collector but sellable nonetheless) and a Rolex with a service case is another (much more difficult to sell without a significant discount). Save all the service receipts in either event!
|
26 September 2011, 06:37 PM | #53 | |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Cheshire - UK
Posts: 24
|
Quote:
Tim |
|
27 September 2011, 12:45 AM | #54 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Jose
Location: Here
Watch: SEA-DWELLER
Posts: 2,232
|
Quote:
With all due respect to everyones opinion on this matter, it seems ridiculous to me to have a SD that is not water proof and is pitting away! Although a beautiful classic, this is not an extremely rare piece that shouldn't be touched - in my opinion if the insurance will pay for a new case from Rolex get it, enjoy the watch, and service it only with Rolex from here on. Even with this you will be able to sell the watch should you need to for way more than you purchased for. |
|
27 September 2011, 03:13 AM | #55 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Kayvan
Location: Paris
Watch: Explorer II 216570
Posts: 195
|
Quote:
My advice is to get the new case if you want to keep the watch and use it for diving/swimming and are not planning on selling it. Keep the old case if you want to sell the watch eventually in the not so distant future. |
|
27 September 2011, 03:56 AM | #56 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Jose
Location: Here
Watch: SEA-DWELLER
Posts: 2,232
|
Quote:
Either way it's a great watch! |
|
1 October 2011, 04:03 AM | #57 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Cheshire - UK
Posts: 24
|
Right!!!! The insurance company have eventually agreed to pay out which I am chuffed to bits about. It sounds like they will stamp the case as a 16660 which is great however the serial numbers going to be different to the original so what are your thoughts around that. The bonus is the insurance payout amount is also going to include service costs, face, glass, Clasp and glass on top of the £3035 case!
|
1 October 2011, 04:41 AM | #58 | |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2011
Real Name: Mickey®
Location: Atlanta, GA
Watch: Swiss Made
Posts: 5,801
|
Quote:
|
|
2 October 2011, 02:07 PM | #59 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: NYC
Posts: 35
|
in 1982-1984 Rolex used a different type of alloy mixed in with the steel cases of their watches. The result is that you get that swiss cheese, pin hole pitting in the case on the watches from those years. For some reason mostly the sea dwellers.
As crazy as I sounds, Rolex Service centers lie, as do most authorized manufactures repair centers. I have seen a dozen people get told that their case would not be air tight or guaranteed air tight but, when they put it on the pressure machine it is as tight as a drum and passes. Never seen one fail due to a pitted case ever. Some other reasons and it can fail but, change a gasket or crank another 1/2 turn on the case back and it passes. Not water tight it complete BS. They know full well what they are doing when they take those rare dials, inserts, hands and bracelets and replace them with new. They act like they are doing you a favor but, what they are doing is removing a certain amount of vintage from the marketplace on a regular basis. Helps drive up the cost of vintage and parts but, you get a 3,000 bill and a watch worth 3,000 less so you just lost 6,000 servicing it there. I would never, ever bring a Rolex to RSC for about 10 different reasons. |
2 October 2011, 02:14 PM | #60 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Jose
Location: Here
Watch: SEA-DWELLER
Posts: 2,232
|
Quote:
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.