New RG Daytona...Is Ceramic more valuable than Gold?...

[Welshwatchman]

Originally Posted by kkwn98

At the end of the day, the price is what it is. Rolex don't need to justify it to anyone.

That's not true.

They market and market quite heavily.

It keeps up the brand perception, the perception of which is vital to those justifying such a large purchase.

[Welshwatchman]

Originally Posted by padi56

This a potato peeler with a round handle and the thin cutting blade is curved oval shape.

Perhaps they should have called it Cera-scraping technology and charged the big big buck.

A clean spud for every achievement.

[mikkemus23]

They charge as much as they think they can get away with.
They are telling us that ceramic is sooo exclusive, even more than gold.

[kkwn98]

Originally Posted by Welshwatchman

That's not true.

They market and market quite heavily.

It keeps up the brand perception, the perception of which is vital to those justifying such a large purchase.

But that doesn't really explain the differential and why the equivalent all gold model is less expensive.

Ultimately, I would say the justification is really "because they can".

[gossbeau]

The main guy I know that works for the RSC told me that the bezels are in fact of gold with ceramic coating. Hence, the high price.
You re welcome people lol

[rmlovett1]

Revived from 2011?

[louis48]

I think e RG rolex ref:116515 still sell even if it comes in the new OysterFLex as an option? it will be the best combo IMO meanwhile wat about one in a Rubber B?

[gossbeau]

Originally Posted by louis48

I think e RG rolex ref:116515 still sell even if it comes in the new OysterFLex as an option? it will be the best combo IMO meanwhile wat about one in a Rubber B?

Gorgeous!!

What about this? Mine will look like that shortly IMG_6607.jpg