ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
16 February 2012, 12:19 AM | #31 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2011
Real Name: Feras
Location: Bahrain
Watch: Rolex,Tag
Posts: 1,923
|
|
16 February 2012, 01:42 AM | #32 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,940
|
Completely varies depending on model, complication, price.
|
16 February 2012, 10:42 AM | #33 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Real Name: Scott
Location: Greensboro GA
Watch: GMT116713 - ATF
Posts: 301
|
Does this answer the question or start a new debate?
http://www.sg-roc.com/threads/10656-...f-Watch-Brands
__________________
116713 TT GMT II 116610 Sub C |
16 February 2012, 10:48 AM | #34 |
Liar & Ratbag
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Renato
Location: NYC / Miami Beach
Watch: Rolex Daytona
Posts: 5,344
|
They aren't comparable across the entire catalog. So if I ranked them based on the company as a whole, my list would be
1. IWC 2. JLC 3. Rolex |
16 February 2012, 10:53 AM | #35 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Joey
Location: Dallas, TX
Watch: SS Sub 16610 M
Posts: 3,824
|
In terms of the horologist... maybe:
1. JLC 2. Rolex 3. IWC But in my mind: 1. Rolex 2. Rolex 3. Rolex
__________________
Current Rotation: Rolex Submariner Date (M) - 1/08, Rolex Milgauss GV (V) - 2/10, Rolex SS Black Daytona (V) - 6/10, Rolex GMTIIC (G) - 5/11, TAG Heuer Silverstone (286/1860) - 1/2015 Former-watches: Omega PO/2535.80/2254, TAG Carrera/F1x2/Monaco, Panerai 312K/292L Wish List: Panerai 270/505, Rolex SMURF, Rolex RG Daytona, Rolex DSSD |
16 February 2012, 11:00 AM | #36 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Real Name: John
Location: Palm Beach, FL
Watch: Sub-C + Exp 42
Posts: 1,654
|
Alot of Rolex bias here
__________________
John Submariner C LN Explorer 42 Polar |
16 February 2012, 12:30 PM | #37 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Kentucky
Watch: 118208
Posts: 2,510
|
I don't about ranking, but here is how they stack up to me as a consumer.
Rolex is the top of my list. JLC makes fine dress watches, their sport watches turn my stomach. IWC does not interest me. -Eddie
__________________
|
16 February 2012, 12:33 PM | #38 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: HR
Location: Planet Earth
Watch: -ing Barts.
Posts: 4,244
|
Yes lol. Rolex > patek.
|
16 February 2012, 12:38 PM | #39 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: CA
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 267
|
I would knock IWC out and give that spot to Omega.
|
16 February 2012, 02:50 PM | #40 |
Liar & Ratbag
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Renato
Location: NYC / Miami Beach
Watch: Rolex Daytona
Posts: 5,344
|
|
16 February 2012, 02:59 PM | #41 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Ed
Location: New England
Watch: Sub,Daytona,GMT,YM
Posts: 997
|
Rank based on what?
For what it's worth, I personally have no desire to own a Jaeger or IWC and a strong desire to own multiple Rolex.
__________________
Time and tide wait for no man... |
16 February 2012, 03:00 PM | #42 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: John
Location: Australia
Watch: Depends on mood.
Posts: 9,536
|
Im suprised Patek was not on the list by the OP....
|
16 February 2012, 03:31 PM | #43 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 9,202
|
In terms of durability, precision in mass, and worldwide acceptance, resale value, and my pure joy of ownership, I have to say I'd only purchase a Rolex.
No other watches even come close for my money. That said, one day I will own a A. Lange Datograph Perpetual in rose gold and a SS Patek Aquanaut on rubber strap. |
16 February 2012, 05:24 PM | #44 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: PA
Posts: 175
|
After looking for a long time at both jlc and iwc I decided on the Rolex. In the sub 10k price Rolex has a better selection in the 50+ I believe iwc and jlc win.
|
16 February 2012, 05:39 PM | #45 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: George
Location: Seattle
Watch: One of Them
Posts: 6,924
|
Based on reliability, ease of maintenance, desirability, and resale, Rolex, IWC, and JLC. JLC is a pain to get serviced due to their stringent parts policy. Pretty much requires sending into JLC. Roland Murphy the great American watchmaker is the only one I know who has a parts account. Also he is a great guy.
Based on fit and finish JLC, IWC, and Rolex. That said, Rolex meets "the bar" of excellence on fit and finish, but if you look at the details to my eye Rolex is a close third.
__________________
|
16 February 2012, 05:56 PM | #46 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Bert
Location: philippines
Watch: 116710 ln
Posts: 3,472
|
|
16 February 2012, 07:21 PM | #47 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Illusive Man
Location: NYC
Watch: Omega Worldtimer
Posts: 668
|
I prefer Rolex of the list, however I prefer some other brands not mentioned here over Rolex.
__________________
|
17 February 2012, 01:10 AM | #48 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: steve
Location: dallas area
Watch: 50's TT t-bird
Posts: 3,689
|
x2
Quote:
Very important to me is the fact that you can get a Rolex serviced almost anywhere. Most other brands making fine watches won't have much of a service network. |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.