ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
14 March 2012, 03:44 AM | #31 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: RedSox Nation
Watch: U Talkn Bout Wilis
Posts: 5,499
|
True - but 40mm is just about right, eh?
__________________
I'm a sailor peg. And I've lost my leg. Climbing up the top sails. I've lost my leg! |
14 March 2012, 03:59 AM | #32 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: Anthony
Location: North Jersey
Watch: Daytona 116528
Posts: 3,425
|
|
14 March 2012, 04:01 AM | #33 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: So. California
Posts: 1,232
|
+1.
__________________
1601, 1675/3, 16753, 16750, 16750, 16700, 16610, 18238 |
14 March 2012, 05:03 AM | #34 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: luke standing
Location: england
Watch: Rolex TT SubC Blue
Posts: 3,992
|
To be truthfull, Bond would really need a bigger sized casing to have all the watch gimmicks that M had installed in it ! You can't really store a nuclear bomb in a Rolex 34mm casing,40mm is surely the minimum for Bond !
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.