would u go the new subc date or....

[mmmk604]

For me, a watch with a date is way more useful.
With that said, you have a few watch pieces with dates already. So I don't think it matters too much which one you choose.

I think the date would hold better value though.

[nick c]

ND

[Osbong]

SubC date!

[simplerolex]

SubC No DATE is my favorite watch ever (for the below the reasons):

1) is clearer to read for divers (than DATE - the date/cyclops presents a slight distraction)

2) is clearer to read at night (than DATE)

3) is consistent with the original design (That made the SUBMARINER a historic watch)

4) I find it better looking than DATE as I am not a big fan of cyclops (Although lot of people claim that it represents the Rolex identity)


Finally, I know, it is nice to have a DATE function; however, I will only buy it, if Rolex start making it without cyclops similar to the Sea Dweller.

[brkanand]

With date function for me.

[dlubix]

Always thumbs up for date but in your case prefer no date and you will not need another rolex anymore :)
Maybe :D

[Psmith]

I find the date very useful - often check it more than the time

[z32turbo]

I'd get the LVC Hulk over the ND SubC. Either would go nice with your collection.

[Time Exposure]

Lets ask YOU a question: when you wear the Daytona, does missing the date drive you nuts or do you simply look at your phone etc. to be reminded?

Yes, you go nuts: Sub with date.

No, missing the date is not a tragic event: Sub no-date in my opinion for the same reasons others have mentioned here.

[Trouble15]

Though the no date is a very nice looking Sub, I use the date feature often on all of my watches so I would go with the date function, 116610LN.

[joe100]

I'm not bowled over by the ceramics but the ND Sub isn't what you'd call a bad choice. I always recommend the GMT but since you have one, the ND Sub is the next logical choice.

[rolexperfect]

Considering your collection I'd go for the Hulk. It's hot right now. It would count as a great addition to your current line up of watches

[honeybear]

Originally Posted by psv

As much as I dig my 114060, sitting on my wrist right now, I'd say you have ss sport Rolex covered. I'd go with a vintage or something different from another brand instead, or a different metal.

That's exactly what I was thinking. Maybe a dress watch instead from Jaeger-LeCoultre or Glashutte Original?

[swish77]

Sub-C ND! The date function is over-rated. I set my bezel to the number of the date. What's so hard about that?

[Mike_Templar]

If it were *ME* I would toss that Breitling, replace it with a Speedmaster 3570.50 manual wind man on the moon.
I would then add to that an Explorer 214270 and call it D-O-N-E Done!

Just my .02 and no offense intended!!!!!

[AK797]

I was debating the same but the ARed cyclops did it for me. All that clarity emerging from the haze...

[rolexperfect]

I asked myself the same question before ordering the SubC date... with date is just better to my eyes.

[Bad Lawyer]

go for ND!!

[mgpdragon64]

Submariner (no date) for me!

[gwalker]

Date. IMHO the Sub Date is one of the most popular models along with the dg.

[jedinite]

sub c date

[HongNinja]

114060 all the way!!!

I'm telling you, it's going to become one seriously popular model.... Well, I guess either way they're popular.

I couldn't be happier with my new ND, so I'm biased.

[supertrooper]

Date.

[brokenchains]

I would go Milguass to balance out your collection!!

[Bernie.H.]

Its a nice collection already but if you want to add another, I personally think any of these four would fit in nicely: (no particular order)

1/ Sub c LV.
2/ DSSD.
3/ Planet Ocean.
4/ Speedmaster.

[robertgrom]

Get the date and your problem's over.

[00Seven]

I prefer the date, but would rather not have the cyclops....which means that I'll likely swap crystals on my 116610LN when the warranty is up.

[stevedssd]

The Hulk would add another dimension to a nice collection or you could go for the date but no cyclops option with The Beast!

[artschool]

Originally Posted by simplerolex

SubC No DATE is my favorite watch ever (for the below the reasons):

1) is clearer to read for divers (than DATE - the date/cyclops presents a slight distraction)

2) is clearer to read at night (than DATE)

3) is consistent with the original design (That made the SUBMARINER a historic watch)

4) I find it better looking than DATE as I am not a big fan of cyclops (Although lot of people claim that it represents the Rolex identity)


Finally, I know, it is nice to have a DATE function; however, I will only buy it, if Rolex start making it without cyclops similar to the Sea Dweller.

cant fault that logic!

[Dream99]

No Date for sure, but why bother with a sub get something differant