ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
4 December 2012, 07:05 AM | #31 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Kingstown
Posts: 58,279
|
A picture like this.
|
4 December 2012, 09:03 AM | #32 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: okc
Posts: 26
|
8 diamond face mens rolex
I think i found it on the band..it has '14' stamp. Of course, i assume it 14kt.
|
4 December 2012, 10:10 AM | #33 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 3,241
|
It does not look good.
A better picture will help like this. |
4 December 2012, 10:30 AM | #34 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: David
Location: australia
Posts: 20,215
|
hmmm, not looking like you have a real band their either, but photos still no good, the clasp is missing markings, stamping and scrolling does not look good but i still cant see to make a 100% call, if the band is indeed aftermarket, it was not a good deal at all. Please provide better photos of the clasp, remove the band you will get a better shot, or remove a screw that would also tell us a lot, if you can photograph the screw thread.
__________________
watches many |
4 December 2012, 12:29 PM | #35 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Real Name: A
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 2,180
|
Hmm, did you check with the place you bought it from, that all parts are genuine and authentic Rolex and no aftermarkets parts have been used?? If indeed the band and dial are aftermarket, then $2800 doesn't seem like a good buy. To be more sure, yes, better quality pics are needed.
|
4 December 2012, 02:37 PM | #36 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Canada
Watch: 116610LN
Posts: 1,594
|
The bracelet appears to be a replica.
|
4 December 2012, 05:12 PM | #37 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Kingstown
Posts: 58,279
|
Time to move to the watch out section.
|
12 December 2012, 07:38 AM | #38 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: okc
Posts: 26
|
Case closed...I received this letter of watch appraisal from where I bought it. I guess to all the so call "experts" that stated that my Rolex wasn't authentic, well here is the proof..t is real and by the way, thanks for posts that were positive and supported. Some people think they know everything in Rolex watches!
|
12 December 2012, 07:41 AM | #39 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: okc
Posts: 26
|
Here is the proof...
|
12 December 2012, 08:28 AM | #40 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Real Name: Richard
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Watch: TT DJ
Posts: 4,456
|
It could be genuine.
I have a mid-80s oyster band and this one looks similar. Note the lack of pin access ports on the end pieces. The clasp is an older one, so it will not have the same markings as later versions. Still, I would ask the dealer how they determined that the dial is genuine Rolex.
__________________
Today, I believe my jurisdiction ends here... Lug Hole Lover® |
12 December 2012, 09:29 AM | #41 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: J
Location: USA Midwest
Watch: Midsize Datejust
Posts: 2,611
|
|
12 December 2012, 09:55 AM | #42 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 3,241
|
It was funny.
I just googled Watches Etc Inc. In one hit on the BBB it read - Business Category - Auto Repair & Service Products & Services - This Company offers Watch Repair I guess it turned into a full time jewelry place of late. |
12 December 2012, 10:03 AM | #43 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Manalapan Florida
Watch: Tridor Masterpiece
Posts: 2,819
|
the paper says it's a 1601? .... whats the problem?
|
12 December 2012, 10:10 AM | #44 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Manalapan Florida
Watch: Tridor Masterpiece
Posts: 2,819
|
Quote:
|
|
12 December 2012, 10:13 AM | #45 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: US
Posts: 2,707
|
|
12 December 2012, 10:14 AM | #46 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: PaulG
Location: Georgia
Posts: 41,908
|
You have a piece of paper...if you are OK then OK.
IMHO, the picture of your bracelet clasp says the person signing the paper doesn't know much about Rolex.
__________________
Does anyone really know what time it is? |
12 December 2012, 10:23 AM | #47 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: Sam
Location: Washington
Watch: the jewels
Posts: 190
|
Quote:
__________________
DJ 116234 (random), TT Sub 16803 (9 mil), SS Sub 16610 (F serial), Oyster Perpetual 116034 (V serial), SS Sub 16610LV (M serial) |
|
12 December 2012, 10:31 AM | #48 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Chris
Location: San antonio, TX
Watch: 116610LV
Posts: 2,143
|
That is not proof at all.... That's a letter from the people who sold it to you, there is NO certification they need from Rolex to write what they did. And clearly stating $12k as value tells me what kind of motives they have behind their "appraisal" I'd suggest you educate yourself in the future BEFORE you spend your money...that goes for anything, not just watches bud. |
12 December 2012, 11:01 AM | #49 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: okc
Posts: 26
|
I think the person name 'imono' who posted the info about watches etc didn't know how to google. the first post on google is www.watchesetc.com. check it out. but he probably won't.
|
12 December 2012, 11:20 AM | #50 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: David
Location: australia
Posts: 20,215
|
I would trust the knowledge of the people on the forum before i trusted the local jewellery store, that apprasial is meaningless they have vested interest in the appraisal, the valuation is crazy, provide clear photos of the clasp, as it shows incorrect marking even in a blurred photo. By the way on the home page of the site you provided the ladies watch has an AFTERMARKET diamond dial, so much for everything in that shop being original . Your dial with no diamonds on the 9 and 6 o'clock was never produced, take it to rolex if you don't believe us. good luck mate we were trying to help you.
__________________
watches many |
12 December 2012, 11:32 AM | #51 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: okc
Posts: 26
|
Oh, by the way...even if you google the correct info 'watches etc' on the bbb site. It states an A+ rating for that company. so some people who post quickly jumps to conclusions too quickly. FYI to those people to are call themselves 'experts' for giving their opinions. DON'T! GET YOUR FACTS STRAIGHT FIRST!
|
12 December 2012, 12:21 PM | #52 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Northeast PA
Watch: TT Yachtmaster
Posts: 36
|
Notice that the "current retail replacement value" is $12,350. I believe that is the current retail price for a TT DJ with an oyster bracelet and diamond dial. It appears this is an appraisal for insurance purposes.
__________________
M-Series 16610LV, TT Yacht-Master (Blue Dial) TT DateJust (Black Diamond Dial) TT Tudor Monarch II, Oris BC3+ |
12 December 2012, 12:30 PM | #53 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: J
Location: USA Midwest
Watch: Midsize Datejust
Posts: 2,611
|
We all know what replacement value does and does not pertain to.
The replacement value of this watch, with non-Rolex aftermarket diamond dial, is not $12K plus. |
12 December 2012, 12:40 PM | #54 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Real Name: Paul
Location: Wales, UK
Posts: 14,578
|
That's me convinced.
Microsoft Word and a printer anyone? I'm not saying out and out that the watch is a fake though the dial and clasp are giving me cause for concern before we can check out if the bracelet is good and there's an actual rolex movement inside the watch. |
12 December 2012, 12:50 PM | #55 | |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Rob
Location: Nearby.
Posts: 24,930
|
Quote:
Remember, you came here to this forum for free advice! This advice, which it seems you are not comprehending (or ignoring), is coming from some members here that have years of knowledge on Rolex, and it's idiosyncrysies... If you take the time to 'Goggle' (IE: search this forum), there are many here who have commented on their own quest, to help you! I, as a few others, think your dial is aftermarket. You can ignore it, or take the assessment seriously.... As for the 'appraisal', it's worth as much as it's printed on. Any legitimate insurance company will NOT, accept it. Appraisals should contain clear pictures (which you are not posting), and in most cases, can not be from a secondary seller. They must come from the product dealer, or a third party not affiliated with the sale. Read into this what you will, but stop thinking you are getting the short stick from this board, and start heeding the advice, and take the direction needed to set things straight......for you!! That is. Take this watch to a Rolex service center, and see, unequivocally, if this is a true and solid all genuine Rolex watch..... No further warnings will follow.
__________________
He who wears a Rolex is always on time, even when late!! TRF's "After Dark" Bar & Nightclub Patron-Founding Member.. |
|
12 December 2012, 12:50 PM | #56 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Manalapan Florida
Watch: Tridor Masterpiece
Posts: 2,819
|
Seems like the Original Poster is ungreatful .. Perhaps we should stop trying to offer helpful advice to him.
|
12 December 2012, 01:23 PM | #57 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Canada
Posts: 529
|
This is another authentification post that is going nowhere fast. The OP is looking for positive comments about his Rolex purchase by posting poorly lit pictures, although the paperwork photos of his appraisal is surprisingly clear. As this post gets longer, the OP is getting more offended because he is not receiving the positive replies he seeks. I think MonBK has supplied an example of a properly lit photo for identification which the OP seems unable to provide.
Just because a jewelery store has a website with watches does not make them an expert. Where I live there is a jewelry store that sells previously owned Rolex watches that I wouldn't touch with a 10 foot pole - they are Franken watches with cobbled parts and aftermarket dials and bracelets. To the average consumer with little knowledge, the price is right, it's a "Rolex" and that's the bottom line so the purchaser is happy. There are many examples on the "WatchOut!!!" post that have turned into mud slinging and pissing contests with someone eventually getting banned. IMO, I think a mod should intervene requesting clear pictures of the bracelet hallmarks, the case with a model / serial number, and a photo of the movement for proper evaluation. If the OP is unable to comply in a reasonable time, the thread should be closed. The sleuths in the W.O. post really don't need to be slammed and insulted for offering their time and a free service to an uninformed buyer seeking help. J. Alan |
12 December 2012, 01:28 PM | #58 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: okc
Posts: 26
|
Here's a pic of the bracelet. I guess I will just have visit reliable Rolex dealer. Never know about free advice on the net.
|
12 December 2012, 01:35 PM | #59 | |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: Jul 2007
Real Name: Rob
Location: Nearby.
Posts: 24,930
|
Quote:
As for the Advice on the net. You weren't asked to come here, remember... It was your choice!
__________________
He who wears a Rolex is always on time, even when late!! TRF's "After Dark" Bar & Nightclub Patron-Founding Member.. |
|
12 December 2012, 01:40 PM | #60 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Canada
Posts: 529
|
Quote:
I think it is time to pull the plug. J. Alan |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.