ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

landroverking · 12 December 2012, 10:29 AM

Not now but 30 years ago I did.

Jsan20 · 12 December 2012, 10:36 AM

Single watch = sub hands down
One watch = no fun

Jim300186 · 12 December 2012, 10:47 AM

I bought my explorer II with the intention of it being my only watch. But that didn't last long six months later I have just bought this.

And I have no intention of giving up the explorer

AK797 · 12 December 2012, 11:37 AM

I joined here thinking a Sub would do for me but now I think I need at least 3 more, and thats just Rolex!

Micha · 12 December 2012, 11:57 AM

I am very grateful that I am in the fortunate position to own more watches than I really need (I know a lot of guys on TRF that would fall into the same category). But if I had to limit myself to only one watch....here you go:

12 December 2012, 10:29 AM	#31
landroverking "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2008 Real Name: Jay Location: TEXAS Watch: Daytona Posts: 7,648	Not now but 30 years ago I did.

12 December 2012, 10:36 AM	#32
Jsan20 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2012 Real Name: James Location: Michigan Watch: 116613LB Posts: 861	Single watch = sub hands down One watch = no fun

12 December 2012, 10:47 AM	#33
Jim300186 "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2012 Real Name: Jamie Location: Alloa, Scotland Watch: SS Daytona Posts: 219	I bought my explorer II with the intention of it being my only watch. But that didn't last long six months later I have just bought this. And I have no intention of giving up the explorer

12 December 2012, 11:37 AM	#34
AK797 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Feb 2010 Real Name: Neil Location: UK Watch: ing ships roll in Posts: 59,368	I joined here thinking a Sub would do for me but now I think I need at least 3 more, and thats just Rolex!

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)