ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

leeye · 7 February 2013, 09:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Travelller

And I'm guessing there was an ever-so-slight muahhaha smile on your face when you wrote that, Lee...

hmmm............the smile is there for many reasons.

firstly, others will get a chance to own a 507 bronzo (

happy for others)

secondly, i'm very happy keeping my 382 bronzo (

happy for myself)

thirdly, the 508 would fit nicely into my collection of Submersibles although i'm now thinking whether i should buy the 389 AMagnetic Submersible

Travelller · 7 February 2013, 10:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by leeye

...the 508 would fit nicely into my collection of Submersibles although i'm now thinking whether i should buy the 389 AMagnetic Submersible

I would skip the 389 and go for the 508, but if you can manage both...

leeye · 7 February 2013, 10:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Travelller

I would skip the 389 and go for the 508, but if you can manage both...

well each Submersible is special on their own. the 389 AMagnetic is anti-magnetic which probably explains why everyone is not drawn to it once the 508 is released. hahahaha.

the 508 black is so sexy but the price ............... keeps getting more and more expensive. i do hope it comes with a ceramic box as well. hahahaha

bcacncnc · 8 February 2013, 01:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by unknown

you, strange becaus eI thought the ceramic would be less popular

I like it VERY much but I thought I was a minority ;-)

They are such different models so I guess I should have expected such polarizing views. I don't know how to say it but they are both nice in completely different ways.

Johnnie · 3 March 2013, 02:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by leeye

well each Submersible is special on their own. the 389 AMagnetic is anti-magnetic which probably explains why everyone is not drawn to it once the 508 is released. hahahaha.

the 508 black is so sexy but the price ............... keeps getting more and more expensive. i do hope it comes with a ceramic box as well. hahahaha

What is the price of 508?

I've google but wasn't lucky enough to find the list price.

alexlt730512 · 3 March 2013, 03:48 PM

i'll go for 507 since i didn't get 382 before :)

Coolcamden · 3 March 2013, 03:56 PM

Neither.

I would want the 15, 30, 45 numbers to face ME, rather than facing the center of the watch. Don't like that part of the design.

David S · 3 March 2013, 04:17 PM

508

unknown · 3 March 2013, 06:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Johnnie

What is the price of 508?

I've google but wasn't lucky enough to find the list price.

It's crazy
In euro : 13.000

3 hands and a ceramic case .... 13.000 euro

Look at Zenith, JLC or IWC and see what you can get for that price.

advocatia · 3 March 2013, 08:07 PM

Neither. I do not get the bronzo thing at all and not a fan of the power reserve on the dial as much as many will tell you its not so bad. Not so bad for me = not so good. I also dont love an all ceramic case. I like the 389 very much. Only sub in the panerai lineup that does it for me is the 389.

Watches24seven · 10 March 2013, 12:55 AM

Super unique!

Yalmutawa · 20 August 2013, 08:25 AM

how much is the 507 im receiving mine next month and still they didnt tell me how much it will be

Yalmutawa · 20 September 2013, 11:14 AM

50/50 hmmm

mborkow · 20 September 2013, 12:42 PM

507: I don't trust the durability of ceramics.

bigstick · 20 September 2013, 03:52 PM

I saw the 507 in the flesh last weekend and despite being sceptical about it on release it looks amazing. The press images don't do it justice, I do wish panerai would get a decent photographer in. The power reserve meter just somehow fits and works, weirdly it doesn't look stuck on, it looks like it was always meant to be there I wasn't the only one who came to this conclusion and if you're not sure about hold off until you actually see one. The 508 wasn't there which makes the comparison difficult. The 508 in a black box would be really cool, I have heard the 507 is coming in the same wooden box as the 382.

Gerry62 · 21 September 2013, 05:19 AM

Bronze ....... exclusive PAM

Carlos98326194 · 21 September 2013, 04:09 PM

Was able to see the 508 in person a couple of months ago..
It was in the shop for display only..

Looks great in person.. Aesthetically speaking.. Its stunning IMHO.
But for the price.. I'd say pass..
50/50 for as well..

lapince · 23 September 2013, 11:17 PM

For me 508 without a second's hesitation, I just hate the "Bronzo", whereas I love the ceramic...

watchmaniac · 24 September 2013, 07:15 AM

507. The bronzo for sure. I think it would age well. Not sure about ceramic watches. I can just see myself dropping and shattering the 508.

laphroaig007 · 24 September 2013, 07:25 AM

508 because it is the real newbie this year !
;-)

salihy · 25 September 2013, 09:58 AM

I couldn't decide between these either, so ordered them both. Will be nice to have these two as my first Panerai's :) But if i had to choose one, I'd lean a bit more to 508.

randyyeap · 14 January 2014, 01:30 AM

5Zero8

unknown · 14 January 2014, 01:43 AM

I started this early 2013 , when they showed us the 532 it was a no brainer for me.

Went without doubt for the 532 :-)

laphroaig007 · 14 January 2014, 09:10 AM

532 ? Well, like this one !!!

DOUGHN · 14 January 2014, 11:08 AM

PRonzo 507 for me

htc8p · 14 January 2014, 12:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cru Jones

If I *had* to get one, the 507, because I like the bronze and green dial more, even though the 508 is pretty cool.

In the end, neither, because I don't like the "power reserve" and "ceramica" text on the dials.

i think we could forgive the power reserve simply because they used bronze

DreambreaX · 14 January 2014, 01:05 PM

507

911GA · 14 January 2014, 07:25 PM

507!

samsmart · 14 February 2014, 02:31 PM

508

lapince · 14 February 2014, 08:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by watchmaniac

507. The bronzo for sure. I think it would age well. Not sure about ceramic watches. I can just see myself dropping and shattering the 508.

I don't think the watch would shatter just by dropping it, I think you need a serious shock to break them....

View Poll Results: your choice
BRONZE PAM 507	78	49.37%
CERAMIC PAM 508	80	50.63%
Voters: 158. You may not vote on this poll

10 March 2013, 12:55 AM	#41
Watches24seven 2025 Pledge Member Join Date: Sep 2012 Real Name: Bruce Ginsberg Location: St. Louis MO USA Watch: Panerai Vintage Posts: 7,482	Personally like the PAM 508 Super unique!

21 September 2013, 04:09 PM	#47
Carlos98326194 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2009 Real Name: Carlos Location: UK Watch: ing YOU! Posts: 1,121	Was able to see the 508 in person a couple of months ago.. It was in the shop for display only.. Looks great in person.. Aesthetically speaking.. Its stunning IMHO. But for the price.. I'd say pass.. 50/50 for as well.. __________________ 16610 116400GV 116520W 00112 116710LN 16610LV 00292 116520B

24 September 2013, 07:25 AM	#50
laphroaig007 "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2010 Real Name: Marc Location: France Watch: 116710 & PAM372 Posts: 1,027	508 because it is the real newbie this year ! ;-) __________________ Always look on the bright side of life... Watch addict...

14 January 2014, 01:43 AM	#53
unknown "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Europe Posts: 2,899	I started this early 2013 , when they showed us the 532 it was a no brainer for me. Went without doubt for the 532 :-) __________________ Instagram : @collectible_watches

3 March 2013, 03:48 PM	#36
alexlt730512 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2011 Posts: 1,249	i'll go for 507 since i didn't get 382 before :)

3 March 2013, 03:56 PM	#37
Coolcamden "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2013 Location: SF Bay Area Posts: 298	Neither. I would want the 15, 30, 45 numbers to face ME, rather than facing the center of the watch. Don't like that part of the design.

3 March 2013, 04:17 PM	#38
David S "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2012 Location: Los Angeles, CA Watch: Patek 5712 Posts: 43	508

3 March 2013, 08:07 PM	#40
advocatia Banned Join Date: May 2005 Real Name: Andy Location: Florida USA Watch: PAM 422 GMTIIC Posts: 868	Neither. I do not get the bronzo thing at all and not a fan of the power reserve on the dial as much as many will tell you its not so bad. Not so bad for me = not so good. I also dont love an all ceramic case. I like the 389 very much. Only sub in the panerai lineup that does it for me is the 389.

20 August 2013, 08:25 AM	#42
Yalmutawa "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2013 Real Name: yousef Location: Kuwait Watch: YMII PAM448 BVGRi Posts: 8	how much is the 507 im receiving mine next month and still they didnt tell me how much it will be

20 September 2013, 11:14 AM	#43
Yalmutawa "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2013 Real Name: yousef Location: Kuwait Watch: YMII PAM448 BVGRi Posts: 8	50/50 hmmm

20 September 2013, 12:42 PM	#44
mborkow "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: san francisco Watch: gmt2c pam372 Posts: 842	507: I don't trust the durability of ceramics.

20 September 2013, 03:52 PM	#45
bigstick "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2013 Location: uk Posts: 27	I saw the 507 in the flesh last weekend and despite being sceptical about it on release it looks amazing. The press images don't do it justice, I do wish panerai would get a decent photographer in. The power reserve meter just somehow fits and works, weirdly it doesn't look stuck on, it looks like it was always meant to be there I wasn't the only one who came to this conclusion and if you're not sure about hold off until you actually see one. The 508 wasn't there which makes the comparison difficult. The 508 in a black box would be really cool, I have heard the 507 is coming in the same wooden box as the 382.

21 September 2013, 05:19 AM	#46
Gerry62 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2010 Location: Italy EU Watch: Rolex Panerai Posts: 7,661	Bronze ....... exclusive PAM

23 September 2013, 11:17 PM	#48
lapince "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2013 Location: Mars Watch: 5712 Posts: 11,509	For me 508 without a second's hesitation, I just hate the "Bronzo", whereas I love the ceramic...

24 September 2013, 07:15 AM	#49
watchmaniac "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2011 Real Name: Michael Location: Charleston, SC Watch: Rolex Submariner Posts: 473	507. The bronzo for sure. I think it would age well. Not sure about ceramic watches. I can just see myself dropping and shattering the 508.

25 September 2013, 09:58 AM	#51
salihy "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2012 Location: Turkey Watch: 5550p Posts: 366	I couldn't decide between these either, so ordered them both. Will be nice to have these two as my first Panerai's :) But if i had to choose one, I'd lean a bit more to 508.

14 January 2014, 01:30 AM	#52
randyyeap Banned Join Date: Jun 2009 Real Name: Randy Location: USA Posts: 298	5Zero8

14 January 2014, 09:10 AM	#54
laphroaig007 "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2010 Real Name: Marc Location: France Watch: 116710 & PAM372 Posts: 1,027	532 ? Well, like this one !!! __________________ Always look on the bright side of life... Watch addict...

14 January 2014, 11:08 AM	#55
DOUGHN "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2011 Location: Manila Watch: AP.Rolex.Pam.Tudor Posts: 372	PRonzo 507 for me __________________ '13 Rolex116610LV Hulk / '16 Tudor BlackbayBronze / '57 Rolex6494 / '64 Rolex1018 / '74 Tudor9101/0 Ranger2 Auto / '94 Tudor 79090 Sub / '02 Tudor 72980 TigerChrono / '11 AP ROO Ti / '12 Panerai 372 / 71' Omega Cons / '91 TagHeuer 4000 Auto / '16 Seiko PADI turtle / '16 Seiko Sumo / Seiko 6139 speedtimer / Seiko Nano

14 January 2014, 01:05 PM	#57
DreambreaX Banned Join Date: Dec 2011 Location: Rolex Estate Posts: 1,304	507

14 January 2014, 07:25 PM	#58
911GA "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2014 Posts: 32	507!

14 February 2014, 02:31 PM	#59
samsmart "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2013 Real Name: sam Location: Dallas, TX Watch: Me Tint Posts: 3,777	508

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)