ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
4 April 2013, 08:14 AM | #31 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: Olly
Location: UK
Watch: Sub C 116610
Posts: 256
|
I think Rolex use white gold for the hands because it's more reflective than stainless steel and it reflects the light better making it more eye catching, so its easier to tell the time in low light conditions
|
4 April 2013, 10:30 AM | #32 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Dallas
Watch: 12800ft = 3900m
Posts: 11,173
|
That's not quite the reason. Rolex uses it to prevent corrosion, particularly when they used tritium. Have you seen the vintage models. Also Rolex's hands have a relatively small amount of metal showing so you don't really benefit too much from the material(sport/professional models). Now my PO's hands have a lot off material on the sides which make them pretty visible in any condition, even a small amount of ambient light touches them and they reflect.
|
4 April 2013, 10:33 AM | #33 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Real Name: Brian
Location: NY
Watch: DJ2, BLNR, PO, Nav
Posts: 606
|
It doesn't matter even if the omega is steel and the rolex is wg, they would both reflect light the same as they are each plated with a thin layer of rhodium, which is a VERY reflective metal. The difference would be in the metal benieth the rhodium, making up the structure of the hands.
|
10 April 2013, 11:37 AM | #34 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Dallas
Watch: 12800ft = 3900m
Posts: 11,173
|
Well, Omega hasn't followed up but I think I found the answer in the latest WatchTime magazine.
In it they test the new Aqua Terra GMT. When they start speaking on the details they mention that the indices are stainless steel. If on this model which is a more (I would say) sophisticated watch has ss indices then we can deduce the hands on that model are ss too. So if this model has ss markers and hands then I am about 90% certain at this point that the diving line has ss hands, indices and logo, especially since this particular detail is obscured. Were they gold, it would definitely be a marketing point of mention somewhere. |
10 April 2013, 10:04 PM | #35 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Real Name: Brian
Location: NY
Watch: DJ2, BLNR, PO, Nav
Posts: 606
|
Quote:
|
|
18 April 2013, 11:00 AM | #36 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Dallas
Watch: 12800ft = 3900m
Posts: 11,173
|
WOW!
Did not see this coming. Omega finally responded and I would never have thought this is the answer I would get. The hands and indices are all bronze then plated in rhodium for added protection. Bronze.....really. Would never have guessed. |
18 April 2013, 11:00 AM | #37 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Dallas
Watch: 12800ft = 3900m
Posts: 11,173
|
double post.
|
20 April 2013, 12:34 PM | #38 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Real Name: Brian
Location: NY
Watch: DJ2, BLNR, PO, Nav
Posts: 606
|
Well that is actually quite interesting... Thanks for the update!!!!!
|
20 April 2013, 01:13 PM | #39 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: Rich
Location: Canada
Watch: Milgauss, GMT IIc
Posts: 3,013
|
Quote:
I find my PO hands much shiner than on my Rolex. I wonder if the AR coating has any effect on this? |
|
20 April 2013, 04:21 PM | #40 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Earth
Posts: 54
|
the question is why bronze? is bronze a better material than steel or is this a cost related decision?
|
20 April 2013, 05:00 PM | #41 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Bert
Location: philippines
Watch: 116710 ln
Posts: 3,472
|
i think bronze is easier to shape to those arrow hands.
and lighter (not sure about this) |
21 April 2013, 06:28 AM | #42 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 2,037
|
Wow. I also would have never guessed that. Thanks for the update!
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.