ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

metallic · 4 July 2013, 10:22 PM

I avoided Rolex for a long time because of its ubiquity and recognizability. Owned several other nice watches from IWC, AP, GO, etc. Finally broke down and bought a Sub-C knowing I could easily flip the watch if needed. Love the Sub. Outstanding watch. A keeper. Still not crazy about the recognizability but I am getting over that notion.

nameIess · 4 July 2013, 10:33 PM

Rolex has become too mainstream today. Everyone wearing it and whever you look you'll see at least three dozens whether you're looking on TV, at cafes, restaurants, school, work... heck... even kids are wearing it today.

joe100 · 4 July 2013, 10:52 PM

In this order: Rolex, Omega, Zenith. If the rest went out of business I wouldn't shed a tear

enricotambunan · 4 July 2013, 10:53 PM

Even if Patek is cheaper than Rolex, i wouldnt spent a dime on Pateks - sorry, but i just dont like their design.

As for name, it actually sways me towards Rolex. Good brand name entails good quality, good service, etc. they wouldnt be so well known if they have cr*p quality.

anothernewphone · 4 July 2013, 11:24 PM

Of the people we encounter on a monthly basis, I'd say less than half a percent of them will notice your watch. Don't over-think things. Compare the comments in this thread to the other threads where people say "no one has ever noticed or commented on my Rolex."

"No one ever notices my watch."
"I don't like Rolex as much because everyone notices it."

bridgs · 5 July 2013, 12:51 AM

I noticed Rolex at a very young age and fell in love. It could have had any name (Timex or Rolex)for all I care, but it was the look, feel, and overall quality that I loved about it and still do love. For me, it is also the best bang for the buck. It is something I can pass down to my sons and I feel they will be able to have them serviced in their lifetimes if the need arises.

Rags · 5 July 2013, 02:19 AM

I just love the Patek Calatrava in rose gold but my wallet says NOOOOOOO!!!!

kxux · 5 July 2013, 03:31 AM

Interesting discussion. I admit that I bought Patek because I liked it. I also like that it is not easily recognized.

SUBversive · 5 July 2013, 03:40 AM

I don't think people notice or care. I had a pal who's wife bought them his/her rolex watches. He had a date just. I saw it and said nice dare just and he looked at me and said, no this is rolex ...my point, I think we're giving people too much credit. Most people are too wrapped up in their own existence to even move out of the left passing lane on the highway. We think they are going to spend time noticing your watch? Plus you should buy for yourself not others.

Chainring · 5 July 2013, 04:38 AM

If the budget so allowed, I'd probably end up owning many more non-Rolex than Rolex watches.

zion_rasta · 5 July 2013, 05:28 AM

I guess most people don't even recognize my gmt IIc. I like Rolex because it is solid.

It is the only jewelry I wear. I also drive toyotas to fly under the radar. Luxury cars attract and create more enemies than friends due to envy and perceptions, unfortunately.

So, I wear my Rolex very happy.

AK797 · 5 July 2013, 06:00 AM

To quote the screech of this summer - "I don't care, I love it!"

68camaro · 5 July 2013, 06:00 AM

I actually had to decide between a Patek 5116 and a Daytona for my first real nice watch. After looking for quite a while these two were my finalists. What other people would think was not a factor for me since vast majority of people would probably never notice. Both names, to me, spoke heirloom quality.

I simply chose the Rolex Daytona because I thought it would be much more versatile than the 5116, which is a dress watch on leather strap, so it would get more wear.

I am now looking hard at a 5119 or waiting and stepping up to a complication like the 5146.

aeon888 · 5 July 2013, 06:12 AM

I wanted a Blancpain fifty fathoms or the newer bathyscape but I couldn't afford it. This is a nice watch if you want to be under the radar to most folks but Wis people will always recognize your blancpain from a distance. ;)

Billywiz · 5 July 2013, 06:12 AM

You buy hat you apire to own...Rolex is my aspiration and always has been to he complete exclusion of others.

Billywiz · 5 July 2013, 06:15 AM

To even suggest Rolex even approached becoming ubiquitous is plain silly...I will tell you that Rolex market market share of th Watch market is nowhere near 1%...

Dr. Robert · 5 July 2013, 06:15 AM

A Rolex is a Rolex, the rest are just watches.

Billywiz · 5 July 2013, 06:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by nameIess

Rolex has become too mainstream today. Everyone wearing it and whever you look you'll see at least three dozens whether you're looking on TV, at cafes, restaurants, school, work... heck... even kids are wearing it today.

OH...yeah,..right...good point...

4 July 2013, 10:52 PM	#33
joe100 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Nov 2007 Real Name: Joe Location: New Mexico Watch: Explorer Posts: 12,838	In this order: Rolex, Omega, Zenith. If the rest went out of business I wouldn't shed a tear __________________ It's Espresso, not Expresso. Coffee is not a train in Italy. -TRF Member 6982-

5 July 2013, 02:19 AM	#37
Rags 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Real Name: Chuck Location: SW Florida Watch: 16233,16610,214270 Posts: 11,196	I just love the Patek Calatrava in rose gold but my wallet says NOOOOOOO!!!! __________________ 16233 Y Serial Datejust 16610 Z Serial Submariner 214270 Explorer *114300 Oyster Perpetual* *76200 Tudor Date+Day*

5 July 2013, 05:28 AM	#41
zion_rasta "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2012 Location: Planet Earth Watch: GMT II ceramic Posts: 1,590	I guess most people don't even recognize my gmt IIc. I like Rolex because it is solid. It is the only jewelry I wear. I also drive toyotas to fly under the radar. Luxury cars attract and create more enemies than friends due to envy and perceptions, unfortunately. So, I wear my Rolex very happy. __________________ Sky Dweller WG 326139 GMT II 116710LN Submariner 1680 Sold - Daytona 116523; YM 116622; Datejust 16233

5 July 2013, 06:15 AM	#47
Dr. Robert 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Dec 2009 Real Name: Bob Location: U.S.A. Watch: 1655 Posts: 64,018	A Rolex is a Rolex, the rest are just watches. __________________ Founder & Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons

4 July 2013, 10:22 PM	#31
metallic "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2013 Real Name: Rick Location: Ohio Posts: 256	I avoided Rolex for a long time because of its ubiquity and recognizability. Owned several other nice watches from IWC, AP, GO, etc. Finally broke down and bought a Sub-C knowing I could easily flip the watch if needed. Love the Sub. Outstanding watch. A keeper. Still not crazy about the recognizability but I am getting over that notion.

4 July 2013, 10:33 PM	#32
nameIess Banned Join Date: Apr 2013 Location: Home Posts: 307	Rolex has become too mainstream today. Everyone wearing it and whever you look you'll see at least three dozens whether you're looking on TV, at cafes, restaurants, school, work... heck... even kids are wearing it today.

4 July 2013, 10:53 PM	#34
enricotambunan "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2013 Location: sydney - jakarta Posts: 191	Even if Patek is cheaper than Rolex, i wouldnt spent a dime on Pateks - sorry, but i just dont like their design. As for name, it actually sways me towards Rolex. Good brand name entails good quality, good service, etc. they wouldnt be so well known if they have cr*p quality.

4 July 2013, 11:24 PM	#35
anothernewphone Banned Join Date: Feb 2013 Real Name: Bill Location: Plymouth Meeting Watch: 116520 Posts: 3,209	Of the people we encounter on a monthly basis, I'd say less than half a percent of them will notice your watch. Don't over-think things. Compare the comments in this thread to the other threads where people say "no one has ever noticed or commented on my Rolex." "No one ever notices my watch." "I don't like Rolex as much because everyone notices it."

5 July 2013, 12:51 AM	#36
bridgs "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2012 Real Name: Shane Location: Minnesota Watch: Rolex Submariner Posts: 1,125	I noticed Rolex at a very young age and fell in love. It could have had any name (Timex or Rolex)for all I care, but it was the look, feel, and overall quality that I loved about it and still do love. For me, it is also the best bang for the buck. It is something I can pass down to my sons and I feel they will be able to have them serviced in their lifetimes if the need arises.

5 July 2013, 03:31 AM	#38
kxux 2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member Join Date: Feb 2012 Real Name: Jan Location: PA Watch: GMT II Posts: 1,110	Interesting discussion. I admit that I bought Patek because I liked it. I also like that it is not easily recognized.

5 July 2013, 03:40 AM	#39
SUBversive Banned Join Date: May 2011 Location: ri Watch: Sun Dial Posts: 14,346	I don't think people notice or care. I had a pal who's wife bought them his/her rolex watches. He had a date just. I saw it and said nice dare just and he looked at me and said, no this is rolex ...my point, I think we're giving people too much credit. Most people are too wrapped up in their own existence to even move out of the left passing lane on the highway. We think they are going to spend time noticing your watch? Plus you should buy for yourself not others.

5 July 2013, 04:38 AM	#40
Chainring "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2012 Real Name: Steve Location: Grand Junction CO Watch: A few, not enough. Posts: 1,725	If the budget so allowed, I'd probably end up owning many more non-Rolex than Rolex watches.

5 July 2013, 06:00 AM	#42
AK797 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Feb 2010 Real Name: Neil Location: UK Watch: ing ships roll in Posts: 59,368	To quote the screech of this summer - "I don't care, I love it!"

5 July 2013, 06:00 AM	#43
68camaro Banned Join Date: Nov 2012 Location: USA! Posts: 862	I actually had to decide between a Patek 5116 and a Daytona for my first real nice watch. After looking for quite a while these two were my finalists. What other people would think was not a factor for me since vast majority of people would probably never notice. Both names, to me, spoke heirloom quality. I simply chose the Rolex Daytona because I thought it would be much more versatile than the 5116, which is a dress watch on leather strap, so it would get more wear. I am now looking hard at a 5119 or waiting and stepping up to a complication like the 5146.

5 July 2013, 06:12 AM	#44
aeon888 "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2012 Location: Midwest Posts: 746	I wanted a Blancpain fifty fathoms or the newer bathyscape but I couldn't afford it. This is a nice watch if you want to be under the radar to most folks but Wis people will always recognize your blancpain from a distance. ;)

5 July 2013, 06:12 AM	#45
Billywiz Banned Join Date: May 2013 Real Name: John Location: Florida Watch: YG President Posts: 2,090	You buy hat you apire to own...Rolex is my aspiration and always has been to he complete exclusion of others.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)