ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Roller07 · 11 September 2013, 10:37 AM

I would not.

nick c · 11 September 2013, 10:39 AM

Simply no

polarinda · 11 September 2013, 11:09 AM

You mean you guys know what that '20 year old' watch is?

16700 for a gmt blnr with 1k top up? Why not?

polarinda · 11 September 2013, 11:11 AM

I read again the post, got.it now.

No!

polarinda · 11 September 2013, 11:13 AM

I read again the post, got.it now.

No!

Bluesy+ 16700+1k >> lvc or blnr, price wise, pedigree wise.

Onikage · 11 September 2013, 11:17 AM

No way..wait and 1k ontop? Ah that's crazy.

Erok · 11 September 2013, 11:22 AM

Nope, but the GMT ii black and blue is dope. Haaahahahaha !

mjclark32 · 11 September 2013, 11:22 AM

I wouldn't

watchwatcher · 11 September 2013, 11:51 AM

No, don't think so.

Bobcat09 · 11 September 2013, 12:10 PM

No

Hairdude1 · 11 September 2013, 12:22 PM

Never

YoyoGift8 · 11 September 2013, 02:42 PM

Absolutely no.

CWIN · 11 September 2013, 02:47 PM

No way.

A.Sharp · 11 September 2013, 02:48 PM

SELL BOTH PRIVATELY, then buy a brand new hulk, and keep the change!

11 September 2013, 11:17 AM	#36
Onikage "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2011 Location: England Watch: 16710, 16628 Posts: 7,757	No way..wait and 1k ontop? Ah that's crazy. __________________ GMT II 16710 TRADITIONAL ( D- Serial #) ROLEXFANBOY P-Club Member #4

11 September 2013, 11:22 AM	#38
mjclark32 "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Real Name: MJC Location: PHL USA Watch: IWC, Rolex, AP Posts: 29,232	I wouldn't __________________

11 September 2013, 02:47 PM	#43
CWIN "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2013 Real Name: Chris Location: San Diego Watch: Patek, AP, Rolex Posts: 4,449	No way. __________________ *Instagram* @cwin

11 September 2013, 02:48 PM	#44
A.Sharp "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2012 Location: New York City Posts: 2,062	SELL BOTH PRIVATELY, then buy a brand new hulk, and keep the change! __________________ A.Sharp "I can't listen to that much Wagner, ya know? I start to get the urge to conquer Poland."

11 September 2013, 10:37 AM	#31
Roller07 "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2012 Location: GMT -5 Watch: HulkPepsiCoke Posts: 2,364	I would not.

11 September 2013, 10:39 AM	#32
nick c Banned Join Date: Feb 2012 Location: Canada Posts: 26,846	Simply no

11 September 2013, 11:09 AM	#33
polarinda "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2011 Real Name: Trav Location: singapore Watch: it Posts: 2,316	You mean you guys know what that '20 year old' watch is? 16700 for a gmt blnr with 1k top up? Why not?

11 September 2013, 11:11 AM	#34
polarinda "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2011 Real Name: Trav Location: singapore Watch: it Posts: 2,316	I read again the post, got.it now. No!

11 September 2013, 11:13 AM	#35
polarinda "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2011 Real Name: Trav Location: singapore Watch: it Posts: 2,316	I read again the post, got.it now. No! Bluesy+ 16700+1k >> lvc or blnr, price wise, pedigree wise.

11 September 2013, 11:22 AM	#37
Erok Member Join Date: Sep 2013 Location: Illinois Posts: 51	Nope, but the GMT ii black and blue is dope. Haaahahahaha !

11 September 2013, 11:51 AM	#39
watchwatcher "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Real Name: Larry Location: Kentucky Watch: Yes Posts: 34,996	No, don't think so.

11 September 2013, 12:10 PM	#40
Bobcat09 "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2013 Real Name: Bob Location: Alabama Posts: 192	No

11 September 2013, 12:22 PM	#41
Hairdude1 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2012 Real Name: Alex Location: Chicago Watch: AP,PP, Rolex Posts: 37,156	Never

11 September 2013, 02:42 PM	#42
YoyoGift8 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Jan 2012 Location: MNL/Henderson NV Watch: Rolex Posts: 967	Absolutely no.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)