ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

ken.liang.5203 · 3 April 2014, 10:06 AM

LV vintage,LVC modern.I choose LVC.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

mike · 3 April 2014, 10:08 AM

Well,...there's chocolate ice cream and vanilla ice cream...I like both.

Mr. K · 3 April 2014, 10:16 AM

My vote LVC

Kiddodoc · 3 April 2014, 10:27 AM

I would lean towards the LV as a collection piece but would wear the Lvc as a regular. I have the LV and the LNc as well as the WG but don't have the Lvc. I have contemplated adding it but that sure is a lot of green, especially as I lean towards the color blue more. Tough decision.

threemonkeys · 3 April 2014, 10:48 AM

C for me. The dial and clasp are pretty neato.

kbutler971 · 3 April 2014, 11:47 AM

I've had both (currently the 16610LV). As nice as the LVc is (and it's amazing) I prefer the non-ceramic version. The case shape and interchangablity of the bezel plus the maxi dial/hands make it for me. As been stated, no real right answer and it's nice to have such fantastic options.

jbsmith · 3 April 2014, 11:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tkerrmd

I have the ceramic version and never tire of it, dial is amazing!

X2. Not to mention glidelock clasp is awesome.

sportsmaven20 · 3 April 2014, 12:12 PM

16610LV gets my vote!

fishingbear · 3 April 2014, 12:36 PM

16610lv

CWIN · 3 April 2014, 01:31 PM

I like both but prefer the ceramic.

sea-dweller · 3 April 2014, 01:43 PM

I like the ceramic version, the green dial is just beautiful!

Gaijin · 3 April 2014, 05:51 PM

I like the original and would buy it but the LVC is beautiful.

travisb · 3 April 2014, 07:19 PM

Lvc

busytimmy · 3 April 2014, 07:29 PM

This thread is entirely useless without a poll.

DVR · 3 April 2014, 08:01 PM

I have had both and still like both but in the end I sold the old model.
The LVc is such a stunning watch not much comes close, any model or brand.
It is one of the most beautiful watches out there. The dial is always different depending on light and it's always a pleasure to look at.

jas316 · 3 April 2014, 08:43 PM

LVc for me

Johny · 3 April 2014, 10:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by venom43

16610LV.....Green and black and never look back. Plus it's a classic. It's a perfect daily wearer.

Just wish they made this version....but I can dream....

buy a black dial and matching hands and get them fitted.

mikkemus23 · 3 April 2014, 11:00 PM

They are both great, but I went with LVc (twice

)

Kadhytia · 3 April 2014, 11:02 PM

Ceramic personally, for investment i would get the 16610

DOUBLE 0 SE7EN · 4 April 2014, 12:13 AM

Go and get this beauty..

mjclark32 · 4 April 2014, 12:59 AM

16610lv imo

rickyslam · 4 April 2014, 12:59 AM

Great picture. Really showed the difference in color.

Quote:

Originally Posted by DVR

I have had both and still like both but in the end I sold the old model.
The LVc is such a stunning watch not much comes close, any model or brand.
It is one of the most beautiful watches out there. The dial is always different depending on light and it's always a pleasure to look at.

Robb · 4 April 2014, 01:04 AM

Here are a few comparison pics

xtra3cats · 4 April 2014, 01:08 AM

I like both but the 16610lv appeals more to me.

cdnwatchguy · 4 April 2014, 01:10 AM

The LV is Kirsty Alley from Star Trek ll Wrath of Khan
The ceramic is Kirsty Alley from Jenny Craig commercials.

I would stick with the slimmer Kirsty.

Nycturbovr6 · 4 April 2014, 03:02 AM

I say ceramic

byodo88 · 4 April 2014, 03:03 AM

Ceramic gets my vote

Dr. Robert · 4 April 2014, 03:10 AM

Depends....if you like a heavy watch get the cer. LV....if you prefer a lighter one get the non-cer LV.

Daveyr · 4 April 2014, 03:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mikkemus23

They are both great, but I went with LVc (twice

)

Stunning

bparone · 4 April 2014, 03:26 AM

These types of threads really should have a poll.

Ceramic for me is so much more interesting.

3 April 2014, 01:31 PM	#40
CWIN "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2013 Real Name: Chris Location: San Diego Watch: Patek, AP, Rolex Posts: 4,449	I like both but prefer the ceramic. __________________ *Instagram* @cwin

3 April 2014, 08:01 PM	#45
DVR "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2005 Real Name: Denis Location: Flanders, EU Watch: Diver watches Posts: 2,004	I have had both and still like both but in the end I sold the old model. The LVc is such a stunning watch not much comes close, any model or brand. It is one of the most beautiful watches out there. The dial is always different depending on light and it's always a pleasure to look at. __________________ AP - BP - UN - GO - GS - JLC - RLX

4 April 2014, 12:59 AM	#51
mjclark32 "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Real Name: MJC Location: PHL USA Watch: IWC, Rolex, AP Posts: 29,232	16610lv imo __________________

4 April 2014, 01:04 AM	#53
Robb 2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member Join Date: Jun 2007 Real Name: Robb Location: USA Watch: BLNR Posts: 4,939	Here are a few comparison pics __________________ 126610LN l 166610LV l 126619LB l 116710BLNR l 126710BLRO l 126720VTNR l 126718GRNR l 116500 white l 116500 black l 116508 john mayer l 116519LN l 116503 white l 126655 l 226627 Ti Master l 116518LN

4 April 2014, 01:10 AM	#55
cdnwatchguy "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Alberta, Canada Posts: 921	The LV is Kirsty Alley from Star Trek ll Wrath of Khan The ceramic is Kirsty Alley from Jenny Craig commercials. I would stick with the slimmer Kirsty. __________________ Keith

3 April 2014, 10:06 AM	#31
ken.liang.5203 "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2014 Posts: 5	LV vintage,LVC modern.I choose LVC. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

3 April 2014, 10:08 AM	#32
mike "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2005 Posts: 22,683	Well,...there's chocolate ice cream and vanilla ice cream...I like both.

3 April 2014, 10:16 AM	#33
Mr. K "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2005 Real Name: Mark Location: Seattle-ish Posts: 6,074	My vote LVC

3 April 2014, 10:27 AM	#34
Kiddodoc 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: May 2009 Real Name: Rick Location: Texas Watch: 15 and counting! Posts: 3,531	I would lean towards the LV as a collection piece but would wear the Lvc as a regular. I have the LV and the LNc as well as the WG but don't have the Lvc. I have contemplated adding it but that sure is a lot of green, especially as I lean towards the color blue more. Tough decision.

3 April 2014, 10:48 AM	#35
threemonkeys "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2011 Real Name: Craig Location: Seattle-ish, USA Watch: GMTIIc, AK, LVc Posts: 7,022	C for me. The dial and clasp are pretty neato.

3 April 2014, 11:47 AM	#36
kbutler971 "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2010 Location: So Cal, USA Watch: ing the Detectives Posts: 984	I've had both (currently the 16610LV). As nice as the LVc is (and it's amazing) I prefer the non-ceramic version. The case shape and interchangablity of the bezel plus the maxi dial/hands make it for me. As been stated, no real right answer and it's nice to have such fantastic options.

3 April 2014, 12:12 PM	#38
sportsmaven20 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Sep 2010 Real Name: Randy Location: USA Watch: Rolex Posts: 1,925	16610LV gets my vote!

3 April 2014, 12:36 PM	#39
fishingbear 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: May 2011 Real Name: George Location: Alabama Watch: GMTsSubLVEx2SDDayt Posts: 4,545	16610lv

3 April 2014, 01:43 PM	#41
sea-dweller "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Real Name: Dennis Location: Bay Area - 925 Posts: 40,018	I like the ceramic version, the green dial is just beautiful!

3 April 2014, 05:51 PM	#42
Gaijin 2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Japan Watch: ing your back. Posts: 16,179	I like the original and would buy it but the LVC is beautiful.

3 April 2014, 07:19 PM	#43
travisb 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Aug 2009 Real Name: Travis Location: FL / NYC Watch: Yes.. Posts: 33,419	Lvc

3 April 2014, 07:29 PM	#44
busytimmy "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2012 Location: Sydney, Australia Watch: ing the detectives Posts: 3,745	This thread is entirely useless without a poll.

3 April 2014, 08:43 PM	#46
jas316 "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2012 Location: Toronto, Canada Watch: 116610LV Posts: 69	LVc for me

3 April 2014, 11:00 PM	#48
mikkemus23 "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2011 Real Name: Eirik Location: Norway Watch: Rolex/Omega/PAM Posts: 1,160	They are both great, but I went with LVc (twice )

3 April 2014, 11:02 PM	#49
Kadhytia "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2013 Location: SoCal & Jakarta Watch: ROLEX, AP, and PP Posts: 916	Ceramic personally, for investment i would get the 16610

4 April 2014, 12:13 AM	#50
DOUBLE 0 SE7EN "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2010 Real Name: KAAN Location: ISTANBUL Watch: Explorer-PAM233 Posts: 1,648	Go and get this beauty..

4 April 2014, 01:08 AM	#54
xtra3cats Banned Join Date: Feb 2008 Location: United States Posts: 931	I like both but the 16610lv appeals more to me.

4 April 2014, 03:02 AM	#56
Nycturbovr6 "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2012 Location: New York Posts: 7,630	I say ceramic

4 April 2014, 03:03 AM	#57
byodo88 "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2014 Location: Los Angeles Watch: Rolex and Panerai Posts: 68	Ceramic gets my vote

4 April 2014, 03:10 AM	#58
Dr. Robert 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Dec 2009 Real Name: Bob Location: U.S.A. Watch: 1655 Posts: 64,002	Depends....if you like a heavy watch get the cer. LV....if you prefer a lighter one get the non-cer LV. __________________ Founder & Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons

4 April 2014, 03:26 AM	#60
bparone "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2013 Location: Nashville, TN Watch: DSSD, DJII, Smstr Posts: 498	These types of threads really should have a poll. Ceramic for me is so much more interesting.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)