The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Other (non-Rolex) Watch Topics > Audemars Piguet Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12 May 2014, 06:03 PM   #31
Soly20
2024 Pledge Member
 
Soly20's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: Soly
Location: UK/US
Watch: Rolex, AP, PP
Posts: 3,089
Go for it. It looks beautiful on your wrist!

Congrats in advance!
Soly20 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 May 2014, 07:02 PM   #32
kilyung
"TRF" Member
 
kilyung's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,950
My usual philosophy is if you have doubts about affording a watch then give it more time.
kilyung is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 May 2014, 08:00 PM   #33
benlee
"TRF" Member
 
benlee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Ben
Location: SIN & JKT
Watch: Rolex, AP, PP
Posts: 9,874
Quote:
Originally Posted by AGKNYC View Post
Hello All,


I have been gifted my first 2 watches, and I am finally financially ready to buy my first...but with the wife, mortgage, and baby...I feel bad spending even 1% of my net worth on one.

Someone please help me out with any advice or formula's you've worked out, thanks in advance.

The actual cost of a watch is what you pay when you bought it less what you can sell it for further down the road. AP holds value relatively well compare to other brands ( but not as good as Rolex and PP ) so maybe 30-40% depreciation to be on the safe side. If writing off this value is OK for you, then you can go ahead. That's how I see it anyway. And the basic needs and long term funds should be taken care of first before any luxury purchase.

But if you feel bad about spending especially with family commitment, perhaps you should wait and reconsider it again at a later stage. There are many things in life that should take priority over watches.
benlee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 May 2014, 08:16 PM   #34
AK797
2024 Pledge Member
 
AK797's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,369
A little trick I have to help me feel better about spending alot on a watch is to really start planning on buying a more expensive one than I first thought, then after a while I switch my focus back to the one I was initially interested in and if I still desire that watch then I feel better for saving a fair bit of cash.

This is all with disposable play money only, terms and conditions apply etc...

And a promise to a wife is not a TRF promise.
AK797 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 May 2014, 09:21 PM   #35
VICI
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: Alex
Location: Gotham City
Watch: IG: Mr_Right_NYC
Posts: 5,672
So w 200 months of expenses in the bank, seems like a green light.

Depends on how you generate money. If you think your income will be continuous.

I would not even think about it if I was confident in my abilities to replenish the ca$h
VICI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 May 2014, 12:14 PM   #36
blakeegan
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: San Francisco
Watch: 5905P, 5711
Posts: 119

Last edited by blakeegan; 13 May 2014 at 12:17 PM.. Reason: Link error
blakeegan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 May 2014, 12:37 PM   #37
Rusty888
"TRF" Member
 
Rusty888's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Real Name: Shaun
Location: Australia
Watch: GMT IIc BLNR
Posts: 363
Quote:
Originally Posted by blakeegan View Post
Now this would send me broke!!!!

Do they even make watches that expensive.

Even if say I had a 2000 dollar difference between fixed expenses. That would mean a $314,000 watch.

Although I could show this to my partner and say that I am very conservative with my money ;) Perhaps I should be another watch and not be so frugal
Rusty888 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 May 2014, 01:01 PM   #38
AGKNYC
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2014
Real Name: Andrew
Location: NYC, SF, MIA
Posts: 33
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rusty888 View Post
Now this would send me broke!!!!

Do they even make watches that expensive.

Even if say I had a 2000 dollar difference between fixed expenses. That would mean a $314,000 watch.

Although I could show this to my partner and say that I am very conservative with my money ;) Perhaps I should be another watch and not be so frugal


Amazing!!! Exactly what I was looking for!

Actually, its pretty accurate...what do u guys think?
AGKNYC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 May 2014, 01:22 PM   #39
improviz
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Tejas
Watch: your step
Posts: 2,806
I think I just wasted five minutes of my life.
__________________
116520 white; 16613 black; 116710; 16570 polar; 16600. AP 15400; 15703. Blancpain Fifty Fathoms. Glashutte Sport Evo GMT. Omega Planet Ocean 2907.50.91; Planet Ocean Liquidmetal LE 222.30.42.20.01.001; Seamaster 2255.80.00. Breitling Crosswind, white. Panerai PAM 005. VC Overseas Chrono, black.
improviz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 May 2014, 02:33 PM   #40
le-temps
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Asia
Watch: 004
Posts: 267
not buying a watch for 10 years is difficult for me...why don't buy her a nice watch, then you can negotiate down to 5 years? Next, you can buy your own watch without feeling guilty.
le-temps is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13 May 2014, 04:12 PM   #41
mspeed76
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: United States
Watch: AP, RM
Posts: 615
that formula is interesting but I don't really understand how age factors into it at all

watches (and most other toys) should be purchased with a % of your disposable income / savings

10%? 20%? depends on your priorities :)
mspeed76 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Wrist Aficionado

WatchShell

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2025, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.