ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
17 May 2014, 05:30 AM | #31 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: B
Location: UK
Posts: 976
|
__________________
Current: 1: Rolex DSSD M 2008 2: Rolex Day-Date 40 YG White Dial Random 2018 3:Panerai Luminor Submersible Titanium PAM 25 2013 P Previous:[/B] 1: Rolex 16610 Y 2002 2: Rolex Daytona V 2008 3: Rolex 16610LV Z 2007 4: Rolex Milgauss 116400GV V 2008 5: Panerai Luminor Marina PR PAM 93 2005 6: AP ROO Diver H 2013 7: Rolex DJ II Slate w/ Grn Romans Random 2013 8:Panerai Submersible Ti PAM 25 2013 |
17 May 2014, 05:34 AM | #32 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: NOR-CAL
Watch: Grail Daytona
Posts: 1,306
|
Quote:
Didn't say for how much??
__________________
ROLEX:(116200)SS DATEJUST,(216570)SS EXPLORER II "POLAR",*(116518-0073)YG DAYTONA*,(116718)YG GMT MASTER IIc,(16610)SS SUBMARINER 50th LV,(16623)TT YACHT-MASTER ~BREITLING:SUPER OCEAN 44 ~JLC:NAVY SEALs ~OMEGA:PLANET OCEAN "LIQUIDMETAL LE" & (2201.51),SPEEEDMASTER PRO "METEORITE DIAL",SEAMASTER PRO GMT "GREAT WHITE" ~TUDOR:BLACK BAY(R) |
|
17 May 2014, 06:00 AM | #33 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: South Florida
Posts: 3,435
|
great post!
__________________
- Rolex Explorer - 214270 - Tudor Black Bay - 79230B - Tudor Chronograph - 79270P - Breitling Chronomat - 10th Anniv. - Huguenin Freres Speedmaster Prototype |
17 May 2014, 06:18 AM | #34 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Real Name: Nicholas
Location: UK
Posts: 2,630
|
Who on earth paid £20k for that??
__________________
Nick |
17 May 2014, 06:47 AM | #35 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Gotham
Posts: 9,641
|
Doubt it left the Rolex factory with that case back, so basically you are paying the extra 15k for an engraved case back, that's madness.
|
17 May 2014, 06:51 AM | #36 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: NYC/South Fl
Watch: Rolex, Patek
Posts: 3,687
|
I think it's very cool. No different than a Somazzatori or COMEX. The SAS had Omegas and Breitlings done as well over the years. Most guys keep them and a very few were sold. I truly hope the soldier who sold it just wanted to make some money as opposed to being in dire need.
|
17 May 2014, 01:01 PM | #37 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Flavio
Location: N/A
Posts: 14,654
|
|
18 May 2014, 12:36 PM | #38 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 1,824
|
Quote:
I am not surprised that some of these SAS editions are going to be up for sale. A lot of people out there will gladly pay the inflated price to own one. Same with the Special Reconnaissance Regiment Exp II. I won't speculate on why, as long as they don't make wild claims. While the SAS is justifiably world renowned, the troopers aren't paid much. The chance to make a 300% profit is attractive. I know several MACV SOG guys who have sold their famous SOG issue items just because they are getting up there and can use the bucks. Sad, but true. From what I understand from the SRR edition, Rolex does the engraving. This edition was reported on this forum to be awarded for achievement, not for sale. IDK if that's correct. What baffles me is the "Who Dares Wins" on the side. The SAS truly have been traditionally very secretive and low key, like CAG (Delta.) Unlike SEALs. And if you dispute this, go to Amazon. New memoir every day. BTW, like your screen name! I used to go by 11B4SierraWhiskey7. Then it got changed to that 18 thing.
__________________
"An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last." "So you have enemies. Good. You must have stood up for something, sometime in your life." Winston Churchill |
|
18 May 2014, 12:52 PM | #39 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: England
Watch: 16710, 16628
Posts: 7,757
|
So are these a Rolex sanctified special edition? Or just an Explorer II with added motto and modified caseback that someone wants 20k+ for? We've seen this "only 100 made special edition military" crap before.
__________________
GMT II 16710 TRADITIONAL ( D- Serial #) ROLEXFANBOY P-Club Member #4 |
18 May 2014, 01:22 PM | #40 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Reno
Posts: 1,028
|
THE DAILY MIRROR!
Deserves no further comment. |
19 May 2014, 08:45 AM | #41 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Kenny
Location: northern ireland
Watch: SDs, Subs & GMTs
Posts: 5,136
|
Highly unlikely that if this watch was in fact owned by a member of British Special Forces, that it was ever taken into action. Let's face it, no such units are going to advertise or identify themselves by carrying something with their named on it! A basic model that had been in action somewhere is likely to be more sought after. That said, unless you have been a member of such a unit or even affiliated in some way, why would you wear such a watch? It just would not seem right!
|
19 May 2014, 08:52 AM | #42 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2014
Real Name: John
Location: La Jolla, CA
Watch: Platona
Posts: 12,194
|
Being retired military, I would not want to own a watch from a service to which I did not belong. To me, it is for wanna-be's. People who fantasize about being special.
No offense intended to potential buyers. Just one opinion. |
19 May 2014, 08:57 AM | #43 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: England
Watch: 16710, 16628
Posts: 7,757
|
These watches are an absolute con imo, and no disrespect to servicemen when I say this. They are absolutely NOTHING like the Milsubs or Comex or others that were actually MADE for a purpose and not adapted under the pretense that they'll be worth something. What's more, they appear to be knocked out by the same group, adding a motto, insignia and supposed limited run number. I'm sorry but down the line I can see a lot of upset people who "invested" in these.
__________________
GMT II 16710 TRADITIONAL ( D- Serial #) ROLEXFANBOY P-Club Member #4 |
19 May 2014, 10:15 AM | #44 | |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Japan
Watch: ing your back.
Posts: 16,179
|
Quote:
Could not agree more. Stolen valor. |
|
19 May 2014, 01:48 PM | #45 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: Luck
Location: Toronto
Watch: yourself
Posts: 477
|
|
20 May 2014, 07:46 AM | #46 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Real Name: Mark
Location: Florida
Watch: 1803 and 16610
Posts: 170
|
Quote:
When I read this post it rang a bell. I have an 1803 DD that I believe belonged to Walt Shumate. I got it back in 1990 from a retired SF guy who I worked with back in Washington, DC and who apparently got it from Walt. It was only after reading this thread that I thought back trying to remember the name of the guy I got it from. I know he died some time ago so I looked up Walt on Google hoping to find out. I didn't realize all the stuff he did that made him kind of famous. The SF dive school in Key West is named after Walt. So I decided to look at the only paperwork I got with the watch, an appraisal by a Jeweler in Fayetteville, NC done for Walt. The watch dates from the early 60's but I don't know if Walt was the original owner and I doubt it. But this sure is a case of 'if this watch could talk'! Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk |
|
20 May 2014, 09:20 AM | #47 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 1,824
|
Quote:
You have a real treasure there! Guard it closely. Whatever you do, protect that documentation. And if you ever feel charitable, donate it to the JFK SWC Museum. I know that they'd love to have it! Thanks for posting!
__________________
"An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last." "So you have enemies. Good. You must have stood up for something, sometime in your life." Winston Churchill |
|
20 May 2014, 09:22 AM | #48 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: NYC/South Fl
Watch: Rolex, Patek
Posts: 3,687
|
The entire watch was done by Rolex at the factory
Quote:
I own a COMEX 16600 but I certainly don't think I'm a saturation diver. Nor would I ever pass myself off as one. I'm simply a watch collector and like things that are a little more rare. The Sommazzatori is very similar to this as it was all done by the factory and that alone makes it rare. Out of the 78 made it seems a fair number have traded in the secondary market for large sums. This watch is an interesting momento in the same vein. Obviously there is a market for it as one sold last year for 35k CHF at auction. It's an interesting footnote for. Rolex as these commissioned watches are rare and only done for those deemed worthy by the company. That makes it interesting not just from the unit that commissioned it but also in the history of Rolex manufacture. What price that's worth is up to the market. In this instance hopefully the soldier is happy with the money he made and the buyer respects the piece for its part of horological history and respects the lineage of the unit it commemorates. |
|
20 May 2014, 09:55 AM | #49 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: England
Watch: 16710, 16628
Posts: 7,757
|
There has so far been little evidence that these are infact officially commissioned by Rolex and not just engraved by an outside source. Rolex are ok with people engraving their watches and will service an engraved piece without replacing parts. Unlike with ProjectX/Prohunter mods. So the question remains - Are these made by Rolex? Or is someone adding a modification that Rolex are "OK" with that they can pass off as Officially Rolex commissioned under the pretense that they are valuable Rare SAS or Sea King MODELS. Daily mirror articles and people turning up to TRF with wonky looking letters (apparently ex-servicemen with appalling com skills, grammar and spelling) multiposting the rare "Seaking Rolex" don't convince me anyway.
__________________
GMT II 16710 TRADITIONAL ( D- Serial #) ROLEXFANBOY P-Club Member #4 |
20 May 2014, 10:07 AM | #50 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Real Name: Paul
Location: Wales, UK
Posts: 14,578
|
I'd not be at all surprised if the watches were ordered through WOS Bond St Rolex AD.
They handled the "Seaking" and "Clearance Diver" commissions. Good business for the dealer, selling 400+ watches, great for the sellers and if the buyers are happily handing over the extra £20,000 for the novelty, good for them too. I admit to have paid nearly £500 for a freaking Beanie Baby as a gift to my mum, a collector at the time. The market tanked in a tulip sort of way and it's worth a tenth of that now but I don't regret it at all since it made my mum happy. |
20 May 2014, 11:00 AM | #51 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: England
Watch: 16710, 16628
Posts: 7,757
|
Ah, each to their own. I'm overthinking this. If someone is happy with a never used SAS man's watch engraved for his unit then good for them.
That was very nice of you but it'll upset Peter if you inspire a "Your Rolex and Beanie Baby" thread.
__________________
GMT II 16710 TRADITIONAL ( D- Serial #) ROLEXFANBOY P-Club Member #4 |
20 May 2014, 04:56 PM | #52 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Real Name: Eric
Location: California
Watch: MkXVIII, 3570.50
Posts: 1,966
|
Quote:
+1 |
|
20 May 2014, 11:02 PM | #53 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Tom
Location: Taipei, Taiwan
Watch: SUB-D(V)
Posts: 102
|
The price should be more proper matched on Prince Harry's EXP II 42mm.
|
20 May 2014, 11:18 PM | #54 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: tom
Location: northern ireland
Watch: my fins
Posts: 10,063
|
who cares who wins ,,,, i think for that price id like the spacing between special , and air , to be a bit nicer ,,,,
not feeling its a bargain , now throw in a proper mil sub , and you would be talking. wonder who did the case back , do rolex usually do case sides as well. not seeing a limited edition number either ,,,, nope ,,, not for me. |
20 May 2014, 11:24 PM | #55 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Gotham
Posts: 9,641
|
Quote:
Not even sure the Sommazzatori dial and engraving mods were done at the Rolex Factory. http://www.rolexforums.com/showthrea...t=SOMMOZZATORI Either way it seems Rolex agreed/authorised this watch, Guido Mondani has given it his seal of approval. I doubt we will see this SAS or the seaking pop up in one of his books. Happy to be proved wrong. |
|
22 May 2014, 12:41 AM | #56 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Real Name: Paul
Location: Wales, UK
Posts: 14,578
|
Quote:
In that scenario, the watch, once re-sold should be worth its original MRSP, surely since the kind deed is already done. I've heard that the negative buzz around these commissions have reverberated back to HQ and that they will be a little less forthcoming to rattle these things off in the future. Don't expect a firefighter edition anytime soon. |
|
22 May 2014, 12:58 AM | #57 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: GMT -5
Watch: HulkPepsiCoke
Posts: 2,364
|
The Daily Mirror calling them the rarest and most collectable watches in the world.
What a joke.
__________________
|
22 May 2014, 01:58 AM | #58 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Real Name: Nathan
Location: Denver, CO
Watch: Too many
Posts: 1,008
|
|
22 May 2014, 02:22 AM | #59 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Real Name: Nathan
Location: Denver, CO
Watch: Too many
Posts: 1,008
|
Quote:
1994 Euro spec M5 (only '94 Euro spec registered in USA) 2002 Audi S8 (1 of 417 imported to USA in 2002) |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.