ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Maxtor · 21 June 2014, 10:35 AM

While we are wishing please sign me up for a new Pepsi in SS.

soho · 22 June 2014, 04:58 AM

Thanks all, interesting and varied comments.

GreatCircle · 22 June 2014, 05:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SaddleSC

BTW...I own the WG Sub and would not be interested in a SS version, not only that, but I would be far less interested in owning the WG version if a watch that looked nearly identical could be purchased for 25% of the price.

So what you are actually trying to say here is that showing off with your whitegold $$$ Sub-hammer to the pathetic SS scum is pretty important for you??

Sweramic · 22 June 2014, 05:59 AM

I have a SS blue Submariner and love it. Sourced original parts and had them switch it from black.

The WG version is cool too, but I don't get the idea of having a diver's watch in white gold

bgbg13 · 22 June 2014, 06:03 AM

in a way they did make this back in the day, just didn't have Rolex written on ituploadfromtaptalk1403380784390.jpg
would love it in ss but would definitely take exclusivity from WG, no way it happens....
How about platinum with white dial white bezel or red dial red bezel??

Sent from my DROID RAZR HD using Tapatalk

AK797 · 22 June 2014, 07:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sweramic

The WG version is cool too, but I don't get the idea of having a diver's watch in white gold

If someone likes gold and they also like diving/swimming/the beach then where is the problem with a gold sub? Even if they hated the water but liked the look of the gold sub would it make more sense to buy a GMT or DD in gold because they were more "appropriate" even tho you didn't like the look of them? Now that is something I would never get the idea of.

SaddleSC · 22 June 2014, 08:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GreatCircle

So what you are actually trying to say here is that showing off with your whitegold $$$ Sub-hammer to the pathetic SS scum is pretty important for you??

Absolutely!

Haha...I don't discriminate...I have plenty of SS in the collection as well:)

nauticajoe · 22 June 2014, 08:03 AM

Can't see that happening. Again, the demand for the WG would be wiped out.

soho · 22 June 2014, 08:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SaddleSC

Absolutely!

Haha...I don't discriminate...I have plenty of SS in the collection as well:)

Great collection Saddle!

SaddleSC · 22 June 2014, 08:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by soho

Great collection Saddle!

Thank you, my friend!

Whistlepig1 · 22 June 2014, 08:20 AM

I'd want one, of course!

And I think they'd sell both WG and SS of the Blue…they've done that before, haven't they?

S.
j

soho · 22 June 2014, 09:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bgbg13

in a way they did make this back in the day, just didn't have Rolex written on itAttachment 505507
would love it in ss but would definitely take exclusivity from WG, no way it happens....
How about platinum with white dial white bezel or red dial red bezel??

Sent from my DROID RAZR HD using Tapatalk

Yep, I figured that out too

KBM · 22 June 2014, 09:10 AM

Option D for me too - I'd love a SS blue Sub.

BlackBay1 · 22 June 2014, 09:19 AM

The blue would be nice in stainless steel but the black would still be first choice.

Daytona4130 · 22 June 2014, 09:26 AM

I think it's only special because it's WG. for 25 grand, you get a lot of watch. If it were SS and WG, I would loose all interest.

22 June 2014, 05:59 AM	#34
Sweramic "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: Europe Watch: Movies Posts: 4,531	I have a SS blue Submariner and love it. Sourced original parts and had them switch it from black. The WG version is cool too, but I don't get the idea of having a diver's watch in white gold __________________ There are three kinds of people in the world: those who can count, and those who can't. -Warren Buffet

22 June 2014, 09:19 AM	#44
BlackBay1 "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2013 Real Name: Chris Location: UK Watch: Daytona Posts: 739	The blue would be nice in stainless steel but the black would still be first choice. __________________ Seiko RAF Gen 1 Chrono Black Bay Red Submariner 114060 Daytona 116520

21 June 2014, 10:35 AM	#31
Maxtor 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Real Name: Max Location: Toronto Watch: Exp 1, DJ Tuxedo Posts: 2,468	While we are wishing please sign me up for a new Pepsi in SS.

22 June 2014, 04:58 AM	#32
soho 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: May 2012 Location: Planet Earth Watch: Varies Posts: 2,055	Thanks all, interesting and varied comments.

22 June 2014, 06:03 AM	#35
bgbg13 "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2010 Real Name: Brian Location: fl Posts: 383	in a way they did make this back in the day, just didn't have Rolex written on ituploadfromtaptalk1403380784390.jpg would love it in ss but would definitely take exclusivity from WG, no way it happens.... How about platinum with white dial white bezel or red dial red bezel?? Sent from my DROID RAZR HD using Tapatalk

22 June 2014, 08:03 AM	#38
nauticajoe "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2010 Real Name: Joe Location: PA Posts: 14,774	Can't see that happening. Again, the demand for the WG would be wiped out.

22 June 2014, 08:20 AM	#41
Whistlepig1 Member Join Date: Apr 2014 Real Name: Steve Location: Michiana Watch: GMT IIc BLNR Posts: 100	I'd want one, of course! And I think they'd sell both WG and SS of the Blue…they've done that before, haven't they? S. j

22 June 2014, 09:10 AM	#43
KBM 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Jan 2010 Real Name: K. Location: 780 Posts: 10,451	Option D for me too - I'd love a SS blue Sub.

22 June 2014, 09:26 AM	#45
Daytona4130 "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2014 Real Name: Jack Location: 'Murica Watch: HBO:) Posts: 1,363	I think it's only special because it's WG. for 25 grand, you get a lot of watch. If it were SS and WG, I would loose all interest.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)