ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

wayne_zmh · 2 September 2008, 05:11 AM

Great review, thx Peter!

stuttgart · 15 October 2008, 09:53 AM

Thanks for the review, I fall in love with the GMTIIC once I see it in person. It's really a great watch.

sea-dweller · 16 October 2008, 09:28 AM

Nice review !

Latrodectus · 16 October 2008, 09:32 AM

great review, thank you

can not wait to get mine!

SS Oyster · 2 November 2008, 06:30 PM

Completely agree with this review. Having just switched from Sub LV to the GMT IIc, I must say he captured how I feel exactly. The supercase is so much more substantial and comfortable. Then, the band and clasp - far superior to what I had with the LV. The sub is functional and works, but I love the solid links, the solid clasp, etc.

ajfjunior · 8 November 2008, 04:57 AM

good post and review, i too have the GMT IIC and love it

petespendthrift · 9 November 2008, 05:31 AM

It's been quite a while since I wrote the original review in this thread. Anyway, I just decided to have a look at it and was surprised to see so many replies. Thank you everyone for the positive comments.

By way of an update:

Although I have had periods where I have been fed up with the polished centre links enough to seriously consider selling it, I still love my GMTII-C and have now sold almost all my other watches (the others just do not compare to this one). I have given the watch a few more dings and dents and it has held up very well to some quite careless everyday wear.

So, I can actually live with the one aspect I do not like. Even though they are not really polished anymore, they do look a bit scruffy as the thousands of tiny hairline scratches are invisible on the brushed links but swirl in all different directions on the centre links.

At some point I intend to ask RSC in London or Bexley if they will brush the centre links for me. I realise that they may refuse but cannot see why they should - I am after all a fee paying customer. If they agree, I will let you know and those who are not buying one because of the polished links (I know there are plenty) can then go ahead and buy with confidence.

I think the watch is Rolex's best ever but still cannot understand why they are pursuing the polished look. Virtually no one had a problem with the all brushed links and in contrast plenty hate the polished look so it seems a no brainer to me. Rolex if you read this: get a grip!

In summary the watch is close to perfection and the one real problem actually easily fixed.

nikhileshsingh · 5 December 2008, 06:21 PM

Pics Buddy !! Post the Pics

Spirit-V12 · 10 December 2008, 01:08 PM

...as you said, the half-link extension in the clasp is a feature that I really love. It´s SO practical to me, that everytime I get my GMT-IIc out of the watchbox, it ends being on my wrist for days...

The new styled clasp is a huge improvement on comfort at the Rolex line, over the old thinner clasp. Watch feels smooth on the wrist, and it´s a very 'plus' for wearing.

About the polished Center Links, I like it as they are, but I have to admit that it gets scuffs easier. Although I have seen a member of this forum having his Bracelet brushed (don´t remeber who) and I recall he saying that polishing the area around the coronet in the clasp was quite tricky..
...just to throw out an idea, I guess it would not be cost-efficient, but maybe asking to buy a whole new bracelet could be an option? a brushed one, I mean.
But afterall, yours is already scuffed, so it might be better to polish this one, and get a polished other as replacement - or for other occasions, maybe...

Anyway...Just enjoy your watch!

Wear it well!
Erwin.

Duncan1 · 4 January 2009, 10:45 AM

Have had mine a month or so, very comfortable, a little more "bling" but that's
a personal thing...anyone who might notice will tell you" nice Rolex"...same thing they'd say about any Rolex....enjoy!

miked · 8 February 2009, 06:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scottjal

Lately sometimes I catch myself admiring the dial when the minute hand is covering the red 24h hand and thinking that looks very good.

Strangest thing just happened. I have never thought about the clutter of the gmt hand. Right after I read this post I looked at my gmt-c and the minute hand was covering the gmt hand. Really weird, it did look nice but then it would not be a gmt right?

Anyway, I had a gmt-II and sold it for the C, after 2 months no regrets.

Psmith · 9 February 2009, 09:50 PM

Nice review, thanks Pete

How about some pics of said beastie ...?

Cheers

Nods · 19 February 2009, 12:23 AM

I am the same at first I thought am I doing the right thing, however every day I am more impressed with my GMT. You look at it and each day you see something more elegant and you know that you made the right decision.

postiff · 19 February 2009, 03:21 AM

Great review. I too struggled with the polished links hated them at first. I ended up buying a cheapy Hong Kong polished bracelet and sported it on my 1675 for a few weeks before getting a GMT IIc. the scratches made it look less shinny even more so when I did the unthinkable and took a 000 steel wool to the polished links and made them way less shinny. I have not had the balls to do this to the GMT yet and probably will not. Four days into the lifetime of this watch and it looks better and better ever day. The clasp itself is truly amazing and I have not yet been able to capture its true beauty in a photo.

hflee55 · 9 March 2009, 12:24 PM

good review.

Nods · 9 March 2009, 04:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by miked

Strangest thing just happened. I have never thought about the clutter of the gmt hand. Right after I read this post I looked at my gmt-c and the minute hand was covering the gmt hand. Really weird, it did look nice but then it would not be a gmt right?

Anyway, I had a gmt-II and sold it for the C, after 2 months no regrets.

As I read this I looked down and sure enough, the minute hand was covering the gmt hand. Completely, I had to have a second look. Talk about synchronicity! I agree with all your comments.

hennabav · 10 March 2009, 02:14 AM

Thanks for your honest opinions about the watch. I thought about getting one of these.

tekkie · 16 March 2009, 10:45 PM

I totally agree that this is the best watch that Rolex has produced in a long time. I had owned a Submariner some 23 years ago and sold it to get a GMT II because of the extra functionality for time zones (I travel a lot). I once had my GMT ripped off my wrist jumping from a C130 in the British paras and found it on the DZ grass later. Muddy and not a scratch on it. I have worn it daily since with one Rolex service.

I have loved the black and red 1987 model but I bought this new version last week and am blown away with it. The quality of EVERYTHING is improved. It's not just a small incremental change it's a very well thought out upgrade to a successful formula and the engineers have done an awesome job.

I also think that we will be seeing a lot less counterfeiting now with the new bezel and internal rim lettering and that's good for everyone.

I agree with your comments on the polished center links.......just wear the darn watch and forget it! On the green time zone hand, I think the red was certainly easier to see than the green, although I prefer the green with my glasses on!

This is set to be a high value piece for the future and a great investment. I know both my sons will have a hard time figuring out who gets the black/ red or the ceramic when I kick the bucket!

(Is that why they are suggesting parachuting again?.........

)

jasper · 17 March 2009, 05:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nods

As I read this I looked down and sure enough, the minute hand was covering the gmt hand. Completely, I had to have a second look.

I did the same thing, and it wasn't...

Joe750 · 23 January 2010, 02:59 AM

Great review, thanks! I have recently discovered this watch, too, at the recommendation of my AD as an 'in-between' the Sub and DeepSea. I was interested in the SD, but since they are no longer available, he suggested the GMTIIc. It is really growing on me, but has one problem for me..the cyclops. I don't mind the polished links, but if I get the GMTIIc I will have the RSC remove the cyclops. In my mind, it will be close to perfect for me then. Just my opinion.

petesjag · 24 January 2010, 09:05 AM

I love a bit of 'bling' so my GMT IIc is right at home on my wrist...
thanks for the great review!!!
pete

nauticajoe · 8 March 2010, 10:55 AM

For me, the polished center links never bothered me. Probably because I've been wearing Breitling's for over 10 yrs; the entire bracelet is polished! In due time, the minor scratches gave the watch character. I love the watch - hands down over the Breitling or my IWC.

nauticajoe · 19 March 2010, 11:38 AM

Great review & an awesome watch! Definitely a keeper.

hng · 21 March 2010, 03:38 PM

It's Rolex's Masterpiece so far!!!

Gster · 28 March 2010, 04:23 AM

Have been wearing mine constantly since September last year and love the watch!
Have the odd scratch here and there, but give it a quick polish up now and again and its fine.....pretty damn well perfect in every way in my opinion.
Just thinking what will be my next purchase....haven't truly seen anything that rocks my boat as much as my GMT IIC

munichblue · 4 April 2010, 07:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by petesjag

I love a bit of 'bling' so my GMT IIc is right at home on my wrist...
thanks for the great review!!!
pete

I don't like the 'bling' so I gave it to a German AD, they did an excellent job and brushed the bracelet. I love the new finish!

cheers - mike

htc8p · 12 April 2010, 02:06 PM

the polished part of the clasp is really scratch prone.

the polished parts are really shiny and can attract attention.

the feel of the bracelet is excellent

black ceramic bezel is really classy

the hints of green are ok but red would be more visible.

the blocky case is ok and fits with the larger numbers on the bezel

conclusion: the watch is really a dress watch and not an everyday watch.

The Waddler · 14 April 2010, 12:56 AM

FAO Munichblue - your AD has done a stellar job on brushing the PCL's - does anyone think it will be possible to replace the bracelet with one from the new ceramic sub with the glidelock? Just curious.

And a brilliant initial review - My GMT IIc is causing me an incredible amount of pain.....

It's a wedding present from my fiancee and I'm not married for another 2 1/2 weeks so I can't wear it!! I can only get it out of the box to show friends if they come over but it's staying locked away until I'm married.

I think about it constantly, so much so it's overshadowing the wedding for me

I will post pics and a full review when I finally get it though - I wanted that to be my first post on here but I couldn't help myself.....

andrew79 · 14 April 2010, 10:26 AM

I just had mine for about 2 weeks now... have anyone tested the power reserve on this model ? the manual said it supposed to be 48 - 50 hours... but i checked yesterday and it stopped after around 32 hours....

Mendota · 1 May 2010, 01:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joe750

...It is really growing on me, but has one problem for me..the cyclops. I don't mind the polished links, but if I get the GMTIIc I will have the RSC remove the cyclops. In my mind, it will be close to perfect for me then. Just my opinion.

Be careful about that. Another member tried this and discovered, much to his shagrin, that the AR coating is in 3 places! On the underside of the crystal, in the exact shape of the cyclops, again on the upper side of the crystal, in the exact shape, and then again on the cyclops itself.

Here's the Rolex spec sheet for the cyclops and crystal:

15 October 2008, 09:53 AM	#32
stuttgart "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: San Jose, CA Watch: Rolex, Patek Posts: 99	Thanks for the review, I fall in love with the GMTIIC once I see it in person. It's really a great watch. __________________ DC

16 October 2008, 09:28 AM	#33
sea-dweller "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Real Name: Dennis Location: Bay Area - 925 Posts: 40,018	Nice review ! __________________ TRF Member #6699 (since September 2007)

16 October 2008, 09:32 AM	#34
Latrodectus 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Real Name: Fred Location: KY, USA Watch: GMT-Master II Posts: 10,042	great review, thank you can not wait to get mine! __________________ Member # 16057 4-Hands Club Tosser Club Member TRF Skypers Group

10 December 2008, 01:08 PM	#39
Spirit-V12 "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2008 Real Name: Erwin Location: Brazil Watch: Z 16600 SeaDweller Posts: 32	...as you said, the half-link extension in the clasp is a feature that I really love. It´s SO practical to me, that everytime I get my GMT-IIc out of the watchbox, it ends being on my wrist for days... The new styled clasp is a huge improvement on comfort at the Rolex line, over the old thinner clasp. Watch feels smooth on the wrist, and it´s a very 'plus' for wearing. About the polished Center Links, I like it as they are, but I have to admit that it gets scuffs easier. Although I have seen a member of this forum having his Bracelet brushed (don´t remeber who) and I recall he saying that polishing the area around the coronet in the clasp was quite tricky.. ...just to throw out an idea, I guess it would not be cost-efficient, but maybe asking to buy a whole new bracelet could be an option? a brushed one, I mean. But afterall, yours is already scuffed, so it might be better to polish this one, and get a polished other as replacement - or for other occasions, maybe... Anyway...Just enjoy your watch! Wear it well! Erwin. __________________ 16600 ♛ *Sea-Dweller* [Z-Serial]

9 February 2009, 09:50 PM	#42
Psmith "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Real Name: Clive Location: Exoplanet Watch: spring-driven Posts: 38,856	Nice review, thanks Pete How about some pics of said beastie ...? Cheers __________________

2 September 2008, 05:11 AM	#31
wayne_zmh "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: australia Posts: 16	Great review, thx Peter!

2 November 2008, 06:30 PM	#35
SS Oyster 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: USA Posts: 9,202	Completely agree with this review. Having just switched from Sub LV to the GMT IIc, I must say he captured how I feel exactly. The supercase is so much more substantial and comfortable. Then, the band and clasp - far superior to what I had with the LV. The sub is functional and works, but I love the solid links, the solid clasp, etc.

8 November 2008, 04:57 AM	#36
ajfjunior "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2008 Real Name: Anthony Location: NYC Watch: GMT Master II C Posts: 37	good post and review, i too have the GMT IIC and love it

9 November 2008, 05:31 AM	#37
petespendthrift Member Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: N/A Posts: 185	It's been quite a while since I wrote the original review in this thread. Anyway, I just decided to have a look at it and was surprised to see so many replies. Thank you everyone for the positive comments. By way of an update: Although I have had periods where I have been fed up with the polished centre links enough to seriously consider selling it, I still love my GMTII-C and have now sold almost all my other watches (the others just do not compare to this one). I have given the watch a few more dings and dents and it has held up very well to some quite careless everyday wear. So, I can actually live with the one aspect I do not like. Even though they are not really polished anymore, they do look a bit scruffy as the thousands of tiny hairline scratches are invisible on the brushed links but swirl in all different directions on the centre links. At some point I intend to ask RSC in London or Bexley if they will brush the centre links for me. I realise that they may refuse but cannot see why they should - I am after all a fee paying customer. If they agree, I will let you know and those who are not buying one because of the polished links (I know there are plenty) can then go ahead and buy with confidence. I think the watch is Rolex's best ever but still cannot understand why they are pursuing the polished look. Virtually no one had a problem with the all brushed links and in contrast plenty hate the polished look so it seems a no brainer to me. Rolex if you read this: get a grip! In summary the watch is close to perfection and the one real problem actually easily fixed.

5 December 2008, 06:21 PM	#38
nikhileshsingh Member Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: New Delhi, INDIA Watch: Sub, Explorer II Posts: 26	Pics Buddy !! Post the Pics

4 January 2009, 10:45 AM	#40
Duncan1 "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: Lkwd NY SRQ FL Watch: GMT Ceramic Posts: 28	Have had mine a month or so, very comfortable, a little more "bling" but that's a personal thing...anyone who might notice will tell you" nice Rolex"...same thing they'd say about any Rolex....enjoy!

19 February 2009, 12:23 AM	#43
Nods Member Join Date: Feb 2009 Real Name: Lionel Wylie Location: Australia Watch: Rolex GMT SS Posts: 277	I am the same at first I thought am I doing the right thing, however every day I am more impressed with my GMT. You look at it and each day you see something more elegant and you know that you made the right decision.

19 February 2009, 03:21 AM	#44
postiff Member Join Date: Feb 2009 Real Name: Danny Location: Ca Watch: 116710LN Posts: 936	Great review. I too struggled with the polished links hated them at first. I ended up buying a cheapy Hong Kong polished bracelet and sported it on my 1675 for a few weeks before getting a GMT IIc. the scratches made it look less shinny even more so when I did the unthinkable and took a 000 steel wool to the polished links and made them way less shinny. I have not had the balls to do this to the GMT yet and probably will not. Four days into the lifetime of this watch and it looks better and better ever day. The clasp itself is truly amazing and I have not yet been able to capture its true beauty in a photo.

9 March 2009, 12:24 PM	#45
hflee55 "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2008 Real Name: Andy Location: Kuala Lumpur, MY Watch: Me Watching You!! Posts: 3,260	good review.

10 March 2009, 02:14 AM	#47
hennabav Banned Join Date: Mar 2009 Real Name: Jon Location: New England Watch: --Rolex-- Posts: 2,391	Thanks for your honest opinions about the watch. I thought about getting one of these.

16 March 2009, 10:45 PM	#48
tekkie "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2009 Real Name: Dan Location: New Jersey Watch: Rolex GMT's Posts: 5	GMT IIc I totally agree that this is the best watch that Rolex has produced in a long time. I had owned a Submariner some 23 years ago and sold it to get a GMT II because of the extra functionality for time zones (I travel a lot). I once had my GMT ripped off my wrist jumping from a C130 in the British paras and found it on the DZ grass later. Muddy and not a scratch on it. I have worn it daily since with one Rolex service. I have loved the black and red 1987 model but I bought this new version last week and am blown away with it. The quality of EVERYTHING is improved. It's not just a small incremental change it's a very well thought out upgrade to a successful formula and the engineers have done an awesome job. I also think that we will be seeing a lot less counterfeiting now with the new bezel and internal rim lettering and that's good for everyone. I agree with your comments on the polished center links.......just wear the darn watch and forget it! On the green time zone hand, I think the red was certainly easier to see than the green, although I prefer the green with my glasses on! This is set to be a high value piece for the future and a great investment. I know both my sons will have a hard time figuring out who gets the black/ red or the ceramic when I kick the bucket! (Is that why they are suggesting parachuting again?......... )

23 January 2010, 02:59 AM	#50
Joe750 Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Texas Posts: 53	Great review, thanks! I have recently discovered this watch, too, at the recommendation of my AD as an 'in-between' the Sub and DeepSea. I was interested in the SD, but since they are no longer available, he suggested the GMTIIc. It is really growing on me, but has one problem for me..the cyclops. I don't mind the polished links, but if I get the GMTIIc I will have the RSC remove the cyclops. In my mind, it will be close to perfect for me then. Just my opinion.

24 January 2010, 09:05 AM	#51
petesjag "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2009 Location: netherlands Posts: 2,177	I love a bit of 'bling' so my GMT IIc is right at home on my wrist... thanks for the great review!!! pete

8 March 2010, 10:55 AM	#52
nauticajoe "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2010 Real Name: Joe Location: PA Posts: 14,774	For me, the polished center links never bothered me. Probably because I've been wearing Breitling's for over 10 yrs; the entire bracelet is polished! In due time, the minor scratches gave the watch character. I love the watch - hands down over the Breitling or my IWC.

19 March 2010, 11:38 AM	#53
nauticajoe "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2010 Real Name: Joe Location: PA Posts: 14,774	Great review & an awesome watch! Definitely a keeper.

21 March 2010, 03:38 PM	#54
hng "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2009 Real Name: HaNgat Location: Jakarta Watch: Sports Rolex Posts: 648	It's Rolex's Masterpiece so far!!! __________________ Cartier Tank / Suunto Stinger / 16014 / 16610LV / PAM 233 / 116520 / 14060M / 16710 / Omega Constellation

28 March 2010, 04:23 AM	#55
Gster "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2009 Real Name: Grant Location: UK Watch: Rolex GMT IIC Posts: 42	Have been wearing mine constantly since September last year and love the watch! Have the odd scratch here and there, but give it a quick polish up now and again and its fine.....pretty damn well perfect in every way in my opinion. Just thinking what will be my next purchase....haven't truly seen anything that rocks my boat as much as my GMT IIC

12 April 2010, 02:06 PM	#57
htc8p "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2009 Real Name: Bert Location: philippines Watch: 116710 ln Posts: 3,472	more reviews and feedback for gmtIIc the polished part of the clasp is really scratch prone. the polished parts are really shiny and can attract attention. the feel of the bracelet is excellent black ceramic bezel is really classy the hints of green are ok but red would be more visible. the blocky case is ok and fits with the larger numbers on the bezel conclusion: the watch is really a dress watch and not an everyday watch.

14 April 2010, 12:56 AM	#58
The Waddler Member Join Date: Apr 2010 Real Name: Alex Location: Back in London Watch: GMT IIc Posts: 380	FAO Munichblue - your AD has done a stellar job on brushing the PCL's - does anyone think it will be possible to replace the bracelet with one from the new ceramic sub with the glidelock? Just curious. And a brilliant initial review - My GMT IIc is causing me an incredible amount of pain..... It's a wedding present from my fiancee and I'm not married for another 2 1/2 weeks so I can't wear it!! I can only get it out of the box to show friends if they come over but it's staying locked away until I'm married. I think about it constantly, so much so it's overshadowing the wedding for me I will post pics and a full review when I finally get it though - I wanted that to be my first post on here but I couldn't help myself..... Last edited by The Waddler; 14 April 2010 at 12:57 AM.. Reason: .

14 April 2010, 10:26 AM	#59
andrew79 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2010 Real Name: Andrew Location: Indonesia Watch: Rolex Posts: 2,277	I just had mine for about 2 weeks now... have anyone tested the power reserve on this model ? the manual said it supposed to be 48 - 50 hours... but i checked yesterday and it stopped after around 32 hours....

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)