ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Karbo · 4 December 2014, 08:04 AM

Both
Or flip coin
Or can you live without date ?

pigman08 · 4 December 2014, 09:21 AM

Sub... I don't care for the fully indexed bezel on the new SD... If I were to buy an SD, it'd be a 16660 or a 16600

joejoe1225 · 4 December 2014, 09:28 AM

Sdc

Jack T · 4 December 2014, 09:30 AM

You can not go wrong with either of the Subs. As someone said, if you're that unsure, buy the most economical, if you call a $6 to $7,000 watch economical !

AK797 · 4 December 2014, 11:56 AM

Depends on if you are going to hang out on this forum, if so get the cheaper subc as you will need the money for your next Rolex.

rollerball · 5 December 2014, 07:34 PM

I would get the SUB C date. I think the small date window on the dial looks a bit out of place. I personally think that the SD 4000 should be designed as a Non date in lieu of the SUB C ND.

travisb · 5 December 2014, 09:30 PM

They wear differently. I prefer the way that the Sub wears. 114060.

mailman · 5 December 2014, 09:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by travisb

They wear differently. I prefer the way that the Sub wears. 114060.

Not as tall and flatter?

travisb · 5 December 2014, 11:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mailman

Not as tall and flatter?

Yes sir!

mailman · 6 December 2014, 12:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by travisb

Yes sir!

Thank you Travis

Nycturbovr6 · 6 December 2014, 02:28 AM

I would say go for the sub

4 December 2014, 08:04 AM	#31
Karbo "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2011 Location: Paris, France Watch: Dayto/5164 Posts: 1,631	Both Or flip coin Or can you live without date ? __________________ IG : @aka_karbo

4 December 2014, 09:28 AM	#33
joejoe1225 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2013 Real Name: Joe Location: USA Watch: ROLEX Posts: 1,928	Sdc __________________

4 December 2014, 09:30 AM	#34
Jack T "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2013 Real Name: Jack Location: The Triangle Watch: Several Posts: 6,719	You can not go wrong with either of the Subs. As someone said, if you're that unsure, buy the most economical, if you call a $6 to $7,000 watch economical ! __________________ Sub 116613 LN; GMT 116710 LN; Sinn 104R; Exp 214270; GS SBGM221; Omega AT

4 December 2014, 09:21 AM	#32
pigman08 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2009 Real Name: Mike Location: Tn Watch: 16610,16710,214270 Posts: 452	Sub... I don't care for the fully indexed bezel on the new SD... If I were to buy an SD, it'd be a 16660 or a 16600

4 December 2014, 11:56 AM	#35
AK797 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Feb 2010 Real Name: Neil Location: UK Watch: ing ships roll in Posts: 59,368	Depends on if you are going to hang out on this forum, if so get the cheaper subc as you will need the money for your next Rolex.

5 December 2014, 07:34 PM	#36
rollerball Member Join Date: Jan 2012 Location: United States Posts: 245	I would get the SUB C date. I think the small date window on the dial looks a bit out of place. I personally think that the SD 4000 should be designed as a Non date in lieu of the SUB C ND.

5 December 2014, 09:30 PM	#37
travisb 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Aug 2009 Real Name: Travis Location: FL / NYC Watch: Yes.. Posts: 33,430	They wear differently. I prefer the way that the Sub wears. 114060.

6 December 2014, 02:28 AM	#41
Nycturbovr6 "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2012 Location: New York Posts: 7,630	I would say go for the sub

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)