ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

cervantes · 9 February 2015, 04:25 PM

Yea, 3 Nauts does seem a bit much. Is the 5164 worth the money? I'm concerned that the 5167 might be too thin.

cervantes · 9 February 2015, 10:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thurgood

Quite the opposite IMHO

But it was on the market for seven odd years in full production, I don't think it's a rare bird.

cervantes · 9 February 2015, 11:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by locutus49

I would deviate from the norm and vote 5170G. Elegant chronograph but a bit sporty and definitely different than your others.

A piece I've always been interested in, but haven't had a chance to try. But to be honest, at that price I might just go for a datograph.

iazrollie · 9 February 2015, 11:27 PM

5167. One of the coolest PPs there is.

cervantes · 10 February 2015, 03:48 PM

Ok, look like I ruled out another nautilus and am going with the aquanaut. What's everyones take on the 5167 vs. 5164? Has there been a consensus or poll on the topic? Thanks all for your insights.

h999r · 10 February 2015, 03:56 PM

5980 best looking Patek sports watch imho.

cervantes · 10 February 2015, 04:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by h999r

5980 best looking Patek sports watch imho.

Yes, you might be right, but I'm thinking more about how it fits my collection.

Puffy · 10 February 2015, 07:57 PM

I'd go 5164 and 5712

Two underestimated pieces in the current lineup

The 5167 became common as muck ages ago

But just get what you think is best and don't listen to us!

cervantes · 10 February 2015, 11:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Puffy

I'd go 5164 and 5712

Two underestimated pieces in the current lineup

The 5167 became common as muck ages ago

But just get what you think is best and don't listen to us!

Well, I already have the 5711 and it took me ages to find one. I'm not sure the fact that the 5167 is common bothers me as it's all relative and any Patek is not really common out in the wild.

More interesting is the prospects of the 5980 appreciating in value.

View Poll Results: Third Patek Sports Watch
Aquanaut 5167	35	36.46%
5980 Blue	42	43.75%
5990	19	19.79%
Voters: 96. You may not vote on this poll

9 February 2015, 11:27 PM	#34
iazrollie "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2013 Real Name: Ian Location: NY Watch: All of them Posts: 3,245	5167. One of the coolest PPs there is. __________________ Rolex, PPs, Breitling

10 February 2015, 07:57 PM	#38
Puffy "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: Here and there Posts: 12,485	I'd go 5164 and 5712 Two underestimated pieces in the current lineup The 5167 became common as muck ages ago But just get what you think is best and don't listen to us! __________________ Fine Quality is Long Remembered After the Pain of Spending Money is Forgotten

9 February 2015, 04:25 PM	#31
cervantes "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2014 Real Name: Jay Location: East and West Posts: 1,894	Yea, 3 Nauts does seem a bit much. Is the 5164 worth the money? I'm concerned that the 5167 might be too thin.

10 February 2015, 03:48 PM	#35
cervantes "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2014 Real Name: Jay Location: East and West Posts: 1,894	Ok, look like I ruled out another nautilus and am going with the aquanaut. What's everyones take on the 5167 vs. 5164? Has there been a consensus or poll on the topic? Thanks all for your insights.

10 February 2015, 03:56 PM	#36
h999r Banned Join Date: May 2011 Real Name: HR Location: Planet Earth Watch: -ing Barts. Posts: 4,244	5980 best looking Patek sports watch imho.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)