ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

-Subsevens · 28 June 2008, 04:37 PM

DARN - IT... You all have me trying on PAM's at the AD's

TswaneNguni · 28 June 2008, 04:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -Subsevens

DARN - IT... You all have me trying on PAM's at the AD's

Need any encouragement ? We are more than wiling to help !!

"Trying PAMs on at the AD... " Sometimes thats not that easy,because you may arrive at the AD and find he has limited stock.Then even on relatively high production models eg. the 104(4000/annum),you may find two or more already on a list waiting for it ....

ezmoney46 · 28 June 2008, 05:14 PM

I was at the Wynn in vegas in April, Their store there has plenty of pam's you just bring in the cash /plastic and they will help with just about any pam you want! Also, The Rolex store their has all the models especially all the bling as well.

-Subsevens · 28 June 2008, 05:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TswaneNguni

Need any encouragement ? We are more than wiling to help !!

"Trying PAMs on at the AD... " Sometimes thats not that easy,because you may arrive at the AD and find he has limited stock.Then even on relatively high production models eg. the 104(4000/annum),you may find two or more already on a list waiting for it ....

Thanks for the offer... They are truly incredible watches with a very rich history! By the way, tried several on, although I don't know the model numbers at all. It was an AD in Orange County California.

My preference are those dressed in black ;) The PAM 00317!!!!!!!

TswaneNguni · 28 June 2008, 05:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ezmoney46

I was at the Wynn in vegas in April, Their store there has plenty of pam's you just bring in the cash /plastic and they will help with just about any pam you want! Also, The Rolex store their has all the models especially all the bling as well.

Problem in Vegas is a discount of any from is unlikely.

TswaneNguni · 28 June 2008, 06:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -Subsevens

Thanks for the offer... They are truly incredible watches with a very rich history! By the way, tried several on, although I don't know the model numbers at all. It was an AD in Orange County California.

My preference are those dressed in black ;) The PAM 00317!!!!!!!

The 292 is a alternative in black in a Radiomir casing.I like the ceramics too,although the golds are my personal favourites.What does look sensational is a ceramic on a nice brown strap.Killer combo !!

paypalbid · 28 June 2008, 11:23 PM

For some strange reason all this talk about wanting a really large size watch reminds me of guys who wants big raised trucks.

RollyFan98012 · 7 January 2014, 10:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Downing

If you trade in your Sub for a Sea-Dweller, the weight difference between your Pam and your Rolex would be less dramatic.

Just a thought--and worth every penny you paid for it!

I have to agree. I just picked up my first PAM 47mm and find it to wear quit comparable to my DSSD.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

bry · 7 January 2014, 02:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Launch Mini

Here are few to look at.

Top centre = 233

Top Right = 98 (My favourite)

Centre row , left to right 190 - 212 - 232 - 49

Bottom = 249

Sweet collection!

Mystro · 7 January 2014, 11:32 PM

Yup, My TT Sub feels like a mid size watch compared to my Pam and PO. If I didn't have so much history with my Rolex, I would sell it.

subtona · 8 January 2014, 12:03 AM

08 Thread BUMP

SDDS17 · 8 January 2014, 12:19 PM

The DeepSea is a pretty good size for a Rolex compared to the Panerai's. I can go back and forth pretty easily bewtween them...

Whorology · 10 January 2014, 01:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mfer

Re-Donk-u-lous.

Ever time I see that damn picture, I cry a little.

Wow! That's a beautiful scene. Do you have a favorite?

DOUGHN · 12 January 2014, 10:26 PM

the new maxi case of the sub wears big than the old sub.
40mm Hulk
42mm AP ROO
47mm Pam 372

s14roller · 13 January 2014, 01:15 PM

After a PAM, my Rolexes seemed small...but strangly enough after some time, the Rolexes started feeling good again.

I think you develop tastes for both sizes over time

TAKUYA · 13 January 2014, 02:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DOUGHN

the new maxi case of the sub wears big than the old sub.
40mm Hulk
42mm AP ROO
47mm Pam 372

Very nice collection and beautiful shot

DOUGHN · 13 January 2014, 02:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by takuya

Very nice collection and beautiful shot

Thanks takuya

Milgaussguys · 15 January 2014, 11:32 AM

Even SUBC LV still too small compared to PAM

lapince · 15 January 2014, 02:04 PM

I still wear my sub and am even thinking of getting an SD, not DSSD, but do agree that the Rolex looks tiny when you put it on after wearing a Pam for a few hours or days...

DreambreaX · 15 January 2014, 04:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DOUGHN

the new maxi case of the sub wears big than the old sub.
40mm Hulk
42mm AP ROO
47mm Pam 372

good choice

DOUGHN · 15 January 2014, 04:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DreambreaX

good choice

Thanks for the nod :)

7 January 2014, 11:32 PM	#40
Mystro 2025 TitaniumYM Pledge Member Join Date: Dec 2009 Real Name: The Mystro ;) Location: Central Pa. Posts: 16,203	Yup, My TT Sub feels like a mid size watch compared to my Pam and PO. If I didn't have so much history with my Rolex, I would sell it. __________________

12 January 2014, 10:26 PM	#44
DOUGHN "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2011 Location: Manila Watch: AP.Rolex.Pam.Tudor Posts: 372	the new maxi case of the sub wears big than the old sub. 40mm Hulk 42mm AP ROO 47mm Pam 372 __________________ '13 Rolex116610LV Hulk / '16 Tudor BlackbayBronze / '57 Rolex6494 / '64 Rolex1018 / '74 Tudor9101/0 Ranger2 Auto / '94 Tudor 79090 Sub / '02 Tudor 72980 TigerChrono / '11 AP ROO Ti / '12 Panerai 372 / 71' Omega Cons / '91 TagHeuer 4000 Auto / '16 Seiko PADI turtle / '16 Seiko Sumo / Seiko 6139 speedtimer / Seiko Nano

15 January 2014, 11:32 AM	#48
Milgaussguys "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2009 Real Name: Huy Location: San Jose Watch: Rolex Milgauss Posts: 136	PAM vs Rolex. Even SUBC LV still too small compared to PAM Attached Images

28 June 2008, 04:37 PM	#31
-Subsevens "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2008 Real Name: Eric Location: So. California Watch: Submariner Posts: 382	DARN - IT... You all have me trying on PAM's at the AD's

28 June 2008, 05:14 PM	#33
ezmoney46 Member Join Date: Nov 2006 Real Name: steve Location: florida Watch: several Posts: 711	I was at the Wynn in vegas in April, Their store there has plenty of pam's you just bring in the cash /plastic and they will help with just about any pam you want! Also, The Rolex store their has all the models especially all the bling as well.

28 June 2008, 11:23 PM	#37
paypalbid Member Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: So Cal Posts: 107	For some strange reason all this talk about wanting a really large size watch reminds me of guys who wants big raised trucks.

8 January 2014, 12:03 AM	#41
subtona 2025 TitaniumYM Pledge Member Join Date: Jan 2011 Real Name: gus Location: East Coast Watch: APK & sometimes Y Posts: 26,902	08 Thread BUMP

8 January 2014, 12:19 PM	#42
SDDS17 "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Location: Arizona Watch: EXP2-42, DJ2, SMPO Posts: 347	The DeepSea is a pretty good size for a Rolex compared to the Panerai's. I can go back and forth pretty easily bewtween them...

13 January 2014, 01:15 PM	#45
s14roller "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2011 Location: US Posts: 3,261	After a PAM, my Rolexes seemed small...but strangly enough after some time, the Rolexes started feeling good again. I think you develop tastes for both sizes over time

15 January 2014, 02:04 PM	#49
lapince "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2013 Location: Mars Watch: 5712 Posts: 11,509	I still wear my sub and am even thinking of getting an SD, not DSSD, but do agree that the Rolex looks tiny when you put it on after wearing a Pam for a few hours or days...

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)