The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Other (non-Rolex) Watch Topics > Ω Omega Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 26 September 2015, 10:07 PM   #31
flw
"TRF" Member
 
flw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Real Name: Frank
Location: Michigan
Watch: Sub 116610LN
Posts: 419
I have both an Omega SMP 300M and a SubC Date. Although the SMP doesn't sit as high as the PO, it is still a 41mm size - but my Rolex looks a fair bit bigger, despite being a 40mm, due to the wide lugs and crown guards.

Take a look at one of the Rolex sport models ... You may be pleasantly surprised by how they look in terms of size.
flw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 September 2015, 10:58 PM   #32
GTS Dean
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: NB, TX
Watch: 3570.50
Posts: 1,016
I really like the deployable half link on the newer Oyster bracelet. PCLs are a matter of personal taste.
__________________
TT OysterQuartz, SS/Black "U" Daytona, TT GMT II-C, DD OysterQuartz, Breitling Aerospace, Omega Speedmaster Pro
GTS Dean is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 September 2015, 04:28 AM   #33
GTS Dean
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: NB, TX
Watch: 3570.50
Posts: 1,016
42mm vs 40mm

__________________
TT OysterQuartz, SS/Black "U" Daytona, TT GMT II-C, DD OysterQuartz, Breitling Aerospace, Omega Speedmaster Pro
GTS Dean is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27 September 2015, 05:41 AM   #34
APguy
"TRF" Member
 
APguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Real Name: Olly
Location: UK
Watch: Omega PO 9300C
Posts: 147
I think I've come to the conclusion that I'll trade in for a Sub C or black GMT II. I just need to go the the AD and have a look. If anyone is interested in a trade please let me know.

One other thing, what is the second hand value of a sub c or GMT ?
APguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 October 2015, 09:14 PM   #35
APguy
"TRF" Member
 
APguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Real Name: Olly
Location: UK
Watch: Omega PO 9300C
Posts: 147
Just back from the AD to have a look at the GMT Master and they offered me £2k part exchange for a second hand Rolex GMT 2010 that had been serviced. The watch was up for £4750 and they wouldn't move at all.

2k for a 5.2k watch that isn't 6 months old yet is honestly astounding ! I will sell it privately because I'm set on owning the GMT master !
APguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 October 2015, 02:26 AM   #36
Nactex
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Real Name: William
Location: East Texas
Watch: Sub ND 124060
Posts: 38
I would do some research and get current prices. I did a trade with an SMPc plus cash for an SM300 MCA. We were both pleased with the transaction. This type of transaction might be something to consider.
Nactex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 October 2015, 04:46 AM   #37
APguy
"TRF" Member
 
APguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Real Name: Olly
Location: UK
Watch: Omega PO 9300C
Posts: 147
You mean from a private seller ?
APguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 October 2015, 10:14 AM   #38
guelerct
"TRF" Member
 
guelerct's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: CT
Watch: Omega Grey Side
Posts: 395
I tried on the Good Planet and the PO and both felt like bricks so I get what you're saying
Great looking watch but hard to live with long term
guelerct is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3 October 2015, 07:06 PM   #39
APguy
"TRF" Member
 
APguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Real Name: Olly
Location: UK
Watch: Omega PO 9300C
Posts: 147
Quote:
Originally Posted by guelerct View Post
I tried on the Good Planet and the PO and both felt like bricks so I get what you're saying
Great looking watch but hard to live with long term

I agree, I mean the watch I have now is bigger than the DSSD ! I get wrist ache when sat at the computer :(
APguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 October 2015, 12:13 PM   #40
Wcdhtwn
"TRF" Member
 
Wcdhtwn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Houston
Watch: SkyD, SD43, GMT2
Posts: 5,054
I think there is a lightly used GMTIIc NR at Davidsw.com for $6250 or so. He's in the US so that may create hassles but it's a great price. Also consider the SeaDweller 4K, it sits taller than the Sub so it gives more heft than the Sub but it is still 40mm. You have to go ExplorerII or Deep Sea to get over 40mm in a Rolex sport watch. Finally I agree, sell your Omega (if you need to), don't trade it.
Wcdhtwn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 October 2015, 11:48 PM   #41
Orange123
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Uk
Watch: Two tone GMT & PO
Posts: 69
Don't do it, it's a great watch. Try a rubber strap it's a lot lighter with that on so may find it more comfortable.

I have the metal strap, rubber and a nato, nato was only about £12 from Amazon so that might be worth a try.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg image.jpg (71.6 KB, 217 views)
Orange123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6 October 2015, 11:50 PM   #42
Orange123
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Uk
Watch: Two tone GMT & PO
Posts: 69
Here the rubber.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg image.jpg (73.9 KB, 213 views)
Orange123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 October 2015, 12:29 AM   #43
BlackBay1
"TRF" Member
 
BlackBay1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Real Name: Chris
Location: UK
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 739
You seem somewhat uncertain in what you want which is probably why you are looking to offload the Omega which presumably you really liked when you spent all that money 6 months ago. I think you just need to step back and take your time before buying again to avoid getting yourself in a similar situation.

Maybe you should just hang onto the Omega and start to build a collection, I personally think it's a great watch you have there and that having spent your hard earned money on it that you should enjoy it.
__________________

Seiko RAF Gen 1 Chrono
Black Bay Red
Submariner 114060
Daytona 116520
BlackBay1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 October 2015, 12:53 AM   #44
RyanOC
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2014
Real Name: Ryan
Location: Cape Town
Posts: 19
Just my 2 cents worth here: I had the 9300 in steel and after a week I had to get rid of it due mainly to the overwhelming weight of the watch.

I have a GMTiiC in my collection that I love but it's a totally different watch and feel (by the way very comfortable on the wrist).

However, I was recently (4 weeks ago) offered a Liquid Metal 9300 on blue rubber at an unbelievable deal and bought the watch. Let me tell you, WOW - what a watch! I have a nice little collection of watches mainly Rolex but this Liquid Metal version, I just can't take it off.

If you like the 9300 but the weight of the watch is the issue perhaps try the titanium version. It totally changed my impressions of the model. Good luck!

Ryan
RyanOC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7 October 2015, 04:07 AM   #45
APguy
"TRF" Member
 
APguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Real Name: Olly
Location: UK
Watch: Omega PO 9300C
Posts: 147
Thank you for your advice, I think the reason I purchased the omega is because I tried it on at the AD and loved it there and then. I purchased it then too which meant I didn't think on it for long. It was an Impulse purchase who has we all know can be risky.

I might go and have another look at the BLNR before I make any crazy decisions. I agree it is a stunning watch to look at and I really like it but on the wrist it is heavy ! I've thought about the rubber strap but think it might be a little sweaty over time 😕

Cheers,
APguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 November 2015, 11:11 PM   #46
yannis
"TRF" Member
 
yannis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Real Name: Yannis
Location: Europe
Watch: maniac
Posts: 9,070
Do not sell it until you try a leather or rubber strap buddy. It feels much better with one of them on.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg IMG_7513.jpg (83.5 KB, 151 views)
__________________
Rolex Submariner 116610LV | Tudor 79220N



yannis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 November 2015, 12:43 AM   #47
mibi
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: atl
Posts: 22
I have a BLNR, never had a moment of remorse. every time i put it on, I feel good.
Also have a less expensive omega speedmaster racing. The 2 watches are completely different. the omega is nice, well built, and a great watch but the BLNR is more unique, more charismatic, more solid, and feels better on the wrist. Interestingly though, I was at Amelia concours last year, wearing my speedster, and some rich guy came up to look at my "daytona". from afar, this guy thought my watch was a white faced daytona and he was super excited, but blew me off when he found out it was an omega! You will never feel bad with a BLNR.
mibi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 November 2015, 01:08 AM   #48
J!m
"TRF" Member
 
J!m's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Real Name: Jim
Location: Connecticut
Watch: this! Hold my beer
Posts: 2,839
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rowlf View Post
I just couldn't stand how high it sat on the wrist. For me it was an instantaneous feeling.

Too bad because the Planet Ocean 2500's sat well and are as solid a watch as you can get.

Plus I still don't like the lack of crown guards. Makes the crown stick out like a lone building in a stark landscape.

Cheers,

Ben
Hi Ben.

I agree- the 2500 is pretty much perfect for an Omega tool/dive watch.

I also agree the newer ceramic/ glass back models seem to cater to the collector crowd who want to watch the rotor whir around. It does not add to the value of the watch and creates another place for a leak to occur.

Crown guards are there- the crown side of the case is wider and the guards are blended in rather than protruding from the case. The crown sits tall but contacts the case when screwed down. It's pretty well protected actually.
J!m is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 November 2015, 03:19 AM   #49
vman
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Capt Swerve
Location: North Carolina
Watch: less TV
Posts: 2,228
To the OP:

It sounds like you've made up your mind. Going with what you don't want, the Omega that you have now, is going to suck. The only remedy is to do what you've already stated: Sell it privately and fund a new watch. You may also want to consider a trade on the forum.
vman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 November 2015, 03:29 AM   #50
Jack T
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Real Name: Jack
Location: The Triangle
Watch: Several
Posts: 6,719
Great thread. I too have a PO 2500, aesthetically it's as nice as any dive watch out there. The dial, the numerals, bezel, the AR crystal. Yes, it's a tall watch and on a bracelet has some heft, but I like mine. I know it's a lot to spend money on a watch you're trying to unload, but a rubber strap may help with the weight. It gives it a more rugged look, less versatile, but could change your impression of a really nice piece.
__________________
Sub 116613 LN; GMT 116710 LN; Sinn 104R;
Exp 214270; GS SBGM221; Omega AT
Jack T is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 November 2015, 10:10 AM   #51
superdog
2024 Pledge Member
 
superdog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Real Name: Seth
Location: nj
Watch: Omega
Posts: 24,827
Quote:
Originally Posted by yannis7777 View Post
Do not sell it until you try a leather or rubber strap buddy. It feels much better with one of them on.
Looks great!!

OP. Impulse if fun. Consider a cost for a good time.

But if the love is gone, move on.
__________________
If happiness is a state of mind, why look anywhere else for it?

IG: gsmotorclub
IG: thesawcollection

(Both mostly just car stuff)
superdog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 November 2015, 02:11 PM   #52
Rockland
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: United States
Posts: 205
I bought a POC 9300 when it came out. Wore it for 2 years. Very heavy and uncomfortable watch. Last year I bought a BLNR. Perfect watch for me. Hasn't come off my wrist in a year. The POC collects dust.
Rockland is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 November 2015, 01:37 AM   #53
TheButcher
"TRF" Member
 
TheButcher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: vancouver
Watch: 14060 & 16570
Posts: 183
I Agree to try it out on the rubber. I have owned two POs and currently have the new 42mm model and love it ,
TheButcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23 November 2015, 12:22 AM   #54
Matrixcode
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Home
Posts: 32
I tried the po's on at a boutique and liked the 42 way better due to the size and weight. I never sized the bracelet but the thought of no micro adjustments really turned me off. I come from breitlings and really wanted the rolex' to be a bit bigger. imo the 40's where a bit bigger than they are, especially the subc case. the deep sea has the same weight / size issues as the po. all of the "glidelock" bracelets are something i would never want to be without on any watch again. i love those. problem is like with you, trying them on does not always do them justice, sometimes you have to wear them sized for a bit. which is how i end up flipping a lot but also justify buying used instead so that flip is not so painful money wise. i also found a site online that let's you rent them for a week which is pretty good but that can cost as much as buying used and flipping.
Matrixcode is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26 November 2015, 04:22 AM   #55
Juggernaut
"TRF" Member
 
Juggernaut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 901
Have you considered flipping it for the non-Chrono version of the PO?
You might even end up with some spare change. I LOVE OMEGA!!! But, I prefer the standard Seamasters without the subdials. If I wanted a Chronograph, I would definitely go for a Speedmaster Pro.
Juggernaut is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.