ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

East Bay Rider · 28 February 2016, 02:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sdelliott58

Matches my Daytona and my Sinn 303.

This car.

daveathall · 28 February 2016, 04:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sdelliott58

Matches my Daytona and my Sinn 303.

Quote:

Originally Posted by East Bay Rider

This car.

This watch.

The Shadow · 29 February 2016, 05:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by texex91

Watch/car equivalents never work.

I have my thoughts, but will pass.

These threads never end well.

It's Ok. This was just for fun

Quote:

Originally Posted by T. Ferguson

I would say Rolex is more of a Porsche. Relatively accessible luxury that's sporty in nature. Both are reliable machines that are meant to be driven.

I always thought of it as Mercedes for the same reasons you wrote. Some consider it "affordable luxury" or "classic luxury", if that makes sense.

Quote:

Originally Posted by GB-man

Hamilton

Good one. Seems spot on.

Quote:

Originally Posted by rr-nyc

Not sure the point or that anyone will agree. Futility comes to mind

Cars and watches don't have a specific counterpart.

We don't have/need to agree. The viewpoints here are interesting and is just for fun.

Rolex to some is a Mercedes, Porsche or even Ferrari. If we all thought alike the world would be a dull place.

"If everyone is thinking alike, then somebody isn't thinking." - George S. Patton

landroverking · 29 February 2016, 07:11 AM

I think your list is good. OP.

The Shadow · 29 February 2016, 07:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by landroverking

I think your list is good. OP.

Thanks.

Dyim · 29 February 2016, 12:21 PM

I think a more interesting question is if you are driving a watch equivalent or wearing a car equivalent.

Ride in a Rolls and wear a Casio?

Wear a PP grand complication and drive a Honda?

Extremes are more fascinating in my mind.

The Shadow · 2 March 2016, 08:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dyim

Ride in a Rolls and wear a Casio?
.

That'd be something to see. No biggie, people'll just call it "eccentric"

Lordofrolex · 2 March 2016, 08:41 AM

A. Lange is not a Bugatti. I think it would be to hard to match up watch brands and cars. But I do agree on some of your match ups.

returntorolex · 2 March 2016, 10:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lordofrolex

A. Lange is not a Bugatti. I think it would be to hard to match up watch brands and cars. But I do agree on some of your match ups.

Aston Martin?

brandrea · 2 March 2016, 10:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by texex91

Watch/car equivalents never work.

I have my thoughts, but will pass.

These threads never end well.

I've seen a few of these go sideways too

LVSubmariner · 2 March 2016, 10:18 AM

This suits me

LVSubmariner · 2 March 2016, 10:20 AM

.

2 March 2016, 08:41 AM	#38
Lordofrolex "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2015 Real Name: Brandon Location: Los Angeles, CA Watch: Yes Please! Posts: 6,691	A. Lange is not a Bugatti. I think it would be to hard to match up watch brands and cars. But I do agree on some of your match ups. __________________ Rolex GMT Master II 116710LN Panerai PAM 359 Audemars Piguet RO 15300OR Follow me on Instagram: @b_jakobovich

29 February 2016, 07:11 AM	#34
landroverking "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2008 Real Name: Jay Location: TEXAS Watch: Daytona Posts: 7,648	I think your list is good. OP.

29 February 2016, 12:21 PM	#36
Dyim "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2014 Location: Canada Posts: 2,237	I think a more interesting question is if you are driving a watch equivalent or wearing a car equivalent. Ride in a Rolls and wear a Casio? Wear a PP grand complication and drive a Honda? Extremes are more fascinating in my mind.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)