SD vs Sub - Which is better on the wrist?

[tphan]

Correct me if I am wrong...the Milgauss is a hair thicker than the SD. It look at home on my 6.75" wrist. It look & feel better than the subdate. So I would assume the SD would look just right on me...well frankly any Rolex would look good on me

Can't go wrong with either SD or Subdate...both are great watch.

[Roselló]

Don't think about it, go with the Sea Dweller. Cheers.

[sfrolex]

Originally Posted by directioneng

Great stuff Jonesy.

A few wrist pix.

My 14060M no date is my daily wearer on a strap (this week on a NATO).

That dateless Sub looks great.

[Tango21]

In my opinion, if I'm spending the money on a Sea Dweller (something that I will be doing before they're gone), then I will certainly be able to afford to have my dress shirts tailored to fit naturally over the SD. At the very least, I'll get out a needle and thread and do it myself!

[DeepSeaWatches]

Although I can't imagine that you would be disappointed with either watch, the sub would probably be the most logical choice as it is more comfortable to wear (IMHO of course) and would work better with dress shirt cuffs.

Having said that, if you at all think that you may be more than a 1 watch guy down the road -- I would snag the SD first. You'll still have more time to bring a sub into the fold.

If you do decide to go the sub route, I would pick up the LV and then add a black bezel insert. The maxi-dial is to die for.

A few parting shots...