Poll: Deepsea: Like it or not?

[AJF]

I see someone is already trying to flip a DSSD on TRF's For Sale Section. Might be the first of many!

Anyone tried "the beast" on under a button cuff work shirt? I guess there might be a few button cuffs that will need to be taken out a tad.

AJF

[BigHat]

Hard to believe that many folks meet the constraints of the poll. None around for me to see as yet.

Didn't vote, but was itching to as I don't need to hold it to feel confident of my views on the watch.

[newrolexman]

I wouldnt trade it for the GMT ll C

[astcell]

I tried one on today. Pretty nice. I love how adjustable the band is!

[B. Doggy]

Anybody ever worn or seen the Tag Heuer Aquagraph? It's similar in many ways; mainly size.

[ffighter556]

Well its the most metal you can get for the price three sea-dwellers in one. I guess you get the most for your money in this one.

[veefour]

Originally Posted by mgm

Wow. That many voters have worn one?

I was thinking the same thing
Didn't vote, but from pics, I have to say I don't like it at all.
It looks to me like some kind of funny watch, good for nothing, expensive, and hard to justifie.

[Fred2]

Originally Posted by jauntime

It's hard to judge by pictures, but being a Panerai fan, I already like it!

I can't wait to see it in person!

With the Panerai, the impression that they give to me is of a huge dial. The watch is all dial (face)

The impression I get of the DSSD is a normal size dial stuffed into a large case.

[moby33]

Would love to vote, but apparently I'm incorrect by reading the thread & following direction. As of this post, 119 individuals already own or have tried on this watch???? I'm pulling out the mighty BS flag on this one!

I'll vote as soon as I try it on. Want to vote yes now, but can't give a 100% definitive answer until I've seen it in the flesh. Cheers.

[Gil F.]

Originally Posted by vjb.knife

I did not answer the poll because I have mixed feeling about it. This afternoon I went to the local AD and looked over their first Rolex Deepsea Seadweller. I went there thinking that I would not even consider getting one because there are just too many things about it that I do not like, but I kept an open mind.

I have to admit that I liked it a lot more than I thought I would. A few of the things that I really liked (I knew I would) are the domed crystal, the maxi dial with the blue lume, the big crown and the bracelet. And let me tell you that bracelet is the best thing on it; It is fantastic! The bracelet is very sturdy and very nicely machined to say the least with the 'glide lock' being the highlight. I am big into bracelets and this is easily the best that I have seen with one small letdown; it should be thicker and wider. It tapers from 21 mm at the watch case to 18mm at the clasp and is the same thickness as (or very close to) the standard Submariner bracelet. I was wearing my Sub date for comparison.

It was touch and go for a while there Boys and I was ready to plop down the greenbacks, but when I compared the dial diameter of the DSSD to my regular Submariner and looked at how thick that thing was I could not bring myself to do it. The dial of the DSSD is actually a good bit less than a regular Submariner date model. The 'Ring Lock' really did not stand out and bother me as much as I thought it would but it leaves the dial size very small compared to the watch case and that is what made me sell off a few others that I have owned. I really find that to bother the heck out of me so it was the deal killer.

I do think that when the next version of the Submariner comes out in Stainless Steel with that bracelet like the DSSD I will have to get one of those but this one just did not grab me nine grand worth. It is also too thick looking, even though I have and have had others that were as thick this watch just didn't look quite right, especially sitting next to a regular Submariner which I find to be a very nice size.

Enjoyed this post, especially considering your qualifications!

[Parachrom]

Ive been wearing a SD for over 30 years now. Thickness is not an issue . The current SD is about a half inch thck, and I came from a Tudor Submariner originally. When i cahnged over I thought the Sd was too thuick but it grew on me, and 30 years later its still Number 1. As for the new SDDS, it may be a bit thicker, wider, I knew that if I gave it a day or two to wear it, I would probably take the plunge and buy one. It was either go into debt , or walk away for the time being. I walked. 9856 dollars not including taxes is a huge chunk of change. This will require careful planning to pull it off.

[pilfilr]

Bump...

[gmtobsessed]

I like the whole look of it, but I just cant wear it because too big.

[Time Traveller]

The size is not a question for me since I have a 45.5mm PO. So I think it is one that I would wear.

[JJ Irani]

Originally Posted by Time Traveller

The size is not a question for me since I have a 45.5mm PO. So I think it is one that I would wear.

I had the same PO once, but found it very heavy and uncomfortable over a period of time. The DSSD weighs about the same as the 45.5 mm PO - i.e. 222 grams with all original links intacat.

JJ

[JohnEaton]

Originally Posted by JJ Irani

I had the same PO once, but found it very heavy and uncomfortable over a period of time. The DSSD weighs about the same as the 45.5 mm PO - i.e. 222 grams with all original links intacat.

JJ

Okay JJ, if your wrist is weak, you don't need a DSSD.

The DSSD is for guys that need a good balance weight so they don't walk in circles

[Green Arrow]

As usual, I find myself agreeing with Vince's analysis, except that on my wrist I actually like the taper of the bracelet. I have a 7.25 inch wrist and the clasp takes up almost the entire underside of my wrist which centers perfectly. Having a little less bracelet on the sides reduces the sense of massiveness of the case and lugs, which I didn't like in pictures, but I really do like it on the wrist.

I would love to see the rehaut go away, and the dial get bigger yet again, but the lume is so good for a Rolex, and the watch is SOOOOOOO comfortable on the wrist, that I think when people actually do get to wear one, preferably without the diver extension as there is already 18 mm of wearer adjustable play in sizing, they will find the watch is just perfect in fit.

Dump the rehaut, and this is the perfect watch. Even with the rehaut, after owning Panerais, Breitlings, GP Seahawks, Bell & Ross, and so on, I still voted with my dollars yesterday.

So while I basically agree with everything Vince had to say except on the bracelet taper, my vote comes out differently. I'm wearing mine as I type this, and I think it is just excellent.

[Green Arrow]

Originally Posted by steel4me

I think the DSSD RAPPER Snoop Dogg) version of dive watches .... had the chain been wider and thicker, or at least wider, I would have liked it ... the case looks too forced and boxy .. no style, just a big lump ....

You really haven't tried one on, have you?

[JohnEaton]

Originally Posted by Green Arrow

You really haven't tried one on, have you?

X 2

[WatchTimes]

Now you have me tempted to take out the divers link...
I have 4 links on each side (plus the divers link) and it
really does fit well but for some reason you have me tempted...

These screws are just sooo hard to get loose at first!

Whats the advantage of taking out the divers link??

[maverick]

I voted yes. Unless you see this watch in person and try it on you really have no idea how it really looks. The writing on the inside is NOT that noticeable like in photographs.

The dial is OK for me because it is like looking down into the watch.

The domed crystal w/o a cyclops is really nice and I found the workmanship top notch. I have looked at the dial with a loop and it is perfect IMHO. =) maverick

[Green Arrow]

Originally Posted by JYogi

Now you have me tempted to take out the divers link...
I have 4 links on each side (plus the divers link) and it
really does fit well but for some reason you have me tempted...

These screws are just sooo hard to get loose at first!

Whats the advantage of taking out the divers link??

Clasp sits more flush with the bottom of your wrist and makes the watch very comfortable. The extension is there for good reason, as the watch would have to go outside a dive suit, but unless you are a saturation diver, the 18 mm play in the clasp without the extension is plenty for anything else you might need.

[Z-Sub]

Too thick, like a double deck bus.
Larger size is fine with me.

[oztimelord]

Already practicing by wearing my WG 116509 which is the same weight .

Yes it is big and it makes a statement.

I'm actually amazed by how much criticism Rolex have received for making the first real TOOL WATCH in years. Maybe we are all so concerned about showing off our watches amongst our friends that we forget the real purpose of a tool watch.

Time to go for a dive and live the dream!!!

[scottschoe]

Originally Posted by mgm

Wow. That many voters have worn one?

I was just typing this...good thing I browsed back a page. I'm still waiting to try one on in norcal.

[mldaytona]

Originally Posted by pilfilr

The new Deepsea is a size shock to most Rolex owners. If you have purchased one...or tried one on...would you keep it?

Mine is excellent and I think is is a great departure from the Rolex line. But, the watch is not for everyone. Lets keep this poll going for the next few months as the world gets its first delivery.

Mark, the Deepsea is truly a fantastic watch. In actuality, people are bitchin' about the watch because of its very high price (US$ 9000), considering it's only a stainless steel tool watch. If the price were set at around US$ 6000, everybody would immediately buy one and embrace the watch's size and bulk.