ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
7 March 2017, 07:15 AM | #31 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Cleveland, OH
Watch: 16710 Pepsi GMT II
Posts: 80
|
I struggled with the same question. I have a GMT II Pepsi and had a Tudor Black Bay Black. Have always loved the look of the 116613LB but thought it was too flashy and I've never worn gold in my life. Also, can I wear with casual attire (jeans t-shirt) or only dress attire? These were all things I was concerned with. Well after pining for it I couldn't take it anymore and I bought a new one about 1.5 weeks ago. It took me about 1 hour to get used to the look on my wrist, it is just so striking and beautiful to stare at. After that, I felt comfortable and haven't taken it off since. I wear it with everything and I absolutely love it! Phenomal in every way.
|
7 March 2017, 07:21 AM | #32 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: NJ
Watch: Day-Date
Posts: 4,056
|
The TTs are Rolexes most versatile watch. It can be worn in any situation. If you have any concerns, the watch is not for you.
|
7 March 2017, 07:21 AM | #33 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Heaven
Watch: Rolex 116613
Posts: 19
|
Its certainly a must have watch in anyone who likes watches collection
|
7 March 2017, 07:28 AM | #34 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,143
|
The bluesy has been around since when: 1983 or whatever? Hundreds of thousands of guys have prob worn one over the years and did any of them have a problem? No.
Ask yourself: is gold or TT Invitca or Michael kors too flashy?? Prob not. People don't care about what others are wearing!! I sure don't. I have my own problems to deal w everyday and not caring if the guy next to my is wearing a bluesy. Life is short, bud. Go for it. |
7 March 2017, 07:54 AM | #35 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Dennis
Location: Bay Area - 925
Posts: 40,018
|
I don't think they are flashy at all. A bit more eye catching than an SS model, though.
__________________
TRF Member #6699 (since September 2007) |
7 March 2017, 08:06 AM | #36 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Harford County MD
Posts: 393
|
To flashy for what?
|
7 March 2017, 08:07 AM | #37 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: London/Tokyo
Watch: FPJ CO BL
Posts: 1,709
|
Thank you everyone for sharing their thoughts but also photos!! Amazing. The blue seems the overwhelming favourite.
Just to clarify, its not really what others think of me that I'm worried about. I tend to buy what I like. But I was somewhat worried about the "wrong" kind of attention. Ie does the TT draw more eyes in a bad way (i.e. does it stand out so that i become a target) etc. I live in London, so generally is a developed safe city but was just wondering if people felt this. Ofcourse I appreciate that it WILL be flashier than say a standard sub, but of course the reason why I am attracted to it, is that this watch just looks ACE. No doubts about the look, is amazing. The blue is truly stunning.
__________________
F.P.Journe Chronometre Optimum Black Label, Patek 5811G-001, Patek 5968A-001, Patek 5167A-001 IG: tokyo_watch_guy |
7 March 2017, 08:08 AM | #38 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: London/Tokyo
Watch: FPJ CO BL
Posts: 1,709
|
Quote:
And yes that looks absolutely stunning!
__________________
F.P.Journe Chronometre Optimum Black Label, Patek 5811G-001, Patek 5968A-001, Patek 5167A-001 IG: tokyo_watch_guy |
|
7 March 2017, 08:15 AM | #39 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Cleveland, OH
Watch: 16710 Pepsi GMT II
Posts: 80
|
|
7 March 2017, 08:42 AM | #40 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Flavio
Location: N/A
Posts: 14,654
|
116613LB too flashy?
For me,yes. Sure it is. But that doesn't mean anything. If you like it get it.
|
7 March 2017, 08:52 AM | #41 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2016
Real Name: Denny
Location: Texas
Watch: 126613LB
Posts: 1,192
|
Quote:
|
|
7 March 2017, 08:55 AM | #42 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2015
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 5,270
|
Of course, it's a matter of personal taste but IMO, it's not too flashy. I wore a TT sub for 10 years and now wear a TT GMT. Wouldn't say it gets more looks than my hulk or black sub but maybe I'm just not paying attention.
I'm drawn to full YG subs and GMTs but think those may be a bit much for me. TT, just right. |
7 March 2017, 08:56 AM | #43 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Larry
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Yes
Posts: 35,002
|
Nah, not at all. It is an eye catching piece, though.
|
7 March 2017, 09:00 AM | #44 |
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: USA
Posts: 90
|
The Bluesy is an awesome watch, you all out and get it
|
7 March 2017, 09:05 AM | #45 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: Tom
Location: Mandeville La
Watch: 126333
Posts: 10,660
|
Love my bluesy.. I never get any comments anywhere.. so too blingy is only a perspective that may or may not apply
|
7 March 2017, 09:08 AM | #46 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: USA
Posts: 670
|
Something about the 116613LB that calls out to you. An attraction so strong ...no questions are needed. You want it, you get it!
|
7 March 2017, 09:10 AM | #47 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,368
|
Quote:
|
|
7 March 2017, 02:16 PM | #48 |
2024 ROLEX DATEJUST41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Real Name: Danny
Location: Bay Area CA
Watch: Yellow Gold
Posts: 20,302
|
No I think its great
|
7 March 2017, 02:28 PM | #49 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Real Name: MUGATU
Location: Philippines
Watch: RolexOmegaPanerai
Posts: 124
|
I got mine a few days back and yeah....it is flashy compared to my Yachtmaster rhodium and subc hulk...
|
7 March 2017, 02:40 PM | #50 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Not 2 far from u
Posts: 3,457
|
I loved mine, wore it as a daily almost anywhere and didn't worry about the bling factor.
|
7 March 2017, 04:24 PM | #51 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,940
|
I agree that the TT model is more noticeable that the all gold model.
|
7 March 2017, 09:58 PM | #52 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: Tom
Location: Mandeville La
Watch: 126333
Posts: 10,660
|
|
7 March 2017, 10:06 PM | #53 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,368
|
|
7 March 2017, 10:10 PM | #54 | ||
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 35,254
|
Quote:
Quote:
Hi guys, I would have thought all-gold would be more "noticeable" than TT, just due to the fact that there's some SS visible. Why do you think otherwise? |
||
7 March 2017, 11:08 PM | #55 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Florida
Posts: 3,081
|
I had a TT Bluesy for 18 years. Wore it less and less over the years. It became too flashy for me. Flipped it for a BLNR about a year and a half ago. Never looked back.
|
7 March 2017, 11:13 PM | #56 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Real Name: Jon
Location: UK
Watch: Smurf/Hulk/1680
Posts: 2,920
|
I think you will be fine in London with regards to unwanted attention. It would be no different in my opinion if it was a SS Sub or a TT Sub, the bad guys know what they are looking for as Neil has already said.
Get the Bluesy - it is a beautiful watch!! Buy it, enjoy it, and don't worry about it! |
7 March 2017, 11:24 PM | #57 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2017
Real Name: Geoff
Location: USA
Watch: ing you!
Posts: 502
|
Quote:
|
|
7 March 2017, 11:47 PM | #58 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Real Name: Michael
Location: RTP, NC, USA
Watch: ♕& Ω
Posts: 5,215
|
Quote:
I'm OK with that, although sometimes I think, eh, I should just wear the (black) sub today, go under the radar.
__________________
Enjoy life - it has an expiration date. Disclaimer: Please note that the avatar is not an accurate representation of how I look. The camera adds 10 pounds... |
|
7 March 2017, 11:49 PM | #59 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Real Name: Scott
Location: UK
Watch: ^^^ for now
Posts: 5,792
|
Quote:
Personally I do believe that the LB stands out much more than the LN. I'd argue its one of the most "stand out" Rolexes out there My wife (in her mid 30's) looked at the LB and her words were "used car salesman" No disrespect intended to either those in the motor trade or who own an LB but the blusey can have a certain image/association - in parts of the UK at least. The bluesy appears to get more love on here than the LN, however I suspect that is as much down to this forum having an international membership base where tastes differ from those in the UK Its a beautiful watch for sure and I can appreciate why it gets so much love, but its not for me. I discounted the LB right at the start and my choice was then TT sub C LN or TT GMT C. My choice was largely down to function (24 hr hand or not) and asthetics (bezel) Went with the 116613LN in the end and am delighted I did. But YOU should go with what YOUR heart tells you
__________________
Past: 6239 (yes, I know...), 16610, 16600, 116515, 116613LN, 126600, 126711 CHNR Present: 16600, 116509, Cartier Santos Green. |
|
8 March 2017, 12:29 AM | #60 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2016
Real Name: Sam Emerson
Location: Las vegas
Watch: Rolex Sub Hulk
Posts: 441
|
Solid gold sub all the way, best looking Rolex ever produced IMHO.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.