Yes or no? (116655)

[rebel_1]

Originally Posted by neurotichamster8

good argument but i think all gold is a little too bling for me; i think the black rubber cuts the gold a tad back

This is one of the reasons I like wearing mine so much, besides it being incredibly comfortable.

The only improvement would be an Easylink on the clasp. That would make this watch perfect.

[LuminousMaximus]

Originally Posted by Canook

i like them (i have a SS/ Platinum dial version as my daily) but cannot justify the price considering the lack of bracelet and the amount of rubber in that price lol!

This is what keeps it exclusive... You only really know, when you know...

[ap1]

Yay

[dougmcn]

One of my favourites watches from Rolex so..yes!

[TheRolexKingofLV]

I like it!

I say do it!

[gwalker]

Yes. I love this watch!!!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[Gerry62]

Yes, awesome

[Blue_Lume]

Originally Posted by hugs

Nice watch but if this is your style I would suggest holding off the trigger until the oysterflex Daytonas are available to try on. Then compare them.

Oh boy, hot topic here.

1st, the oysterflex on the yachtmaster doesn't fit the case snug. That's a fact.
2nd, the prices of these 2 watches should not be as close as they are given the differences in complications and the price differences of the stainless and two tone models. That's an opinion.

BUT - there are a ton of us that have the 116515 Daytona. I have had mine 2 years now. I looked around, no other Daytonas on ceramic until the Platinum came out. I knew the 116518 and 116519 would get there eventually.

Everyone's came on leather unless you bought it 2nd hand. I moved mine to rubber b to give it more flexibility in wear.

Positive side: at least rolex got it right and the strap fits the case snug.

Negative side: my clasp doesn't work with easy link oysterflex, so supposedly it's $3,000 to get a new one. I'm not sure what the cost is for a swap out. Either way, I think it's much more financially sound to just buy a $200 rubber b in black vs. $3k to retrofit the oysterflex.

What does that mean? You can try it on today. You just won't get the ones with oysterflex.

[enjoythemusic]

YES! Keep debating getting one myself, and just may if i give in at some point.

[Boostedfreak]

Yes...I don't know why so many people think everyone needs to have a Daytona. I personally do not care for them. That's why Rolex gives us choices.

[vladamir15]

Yes!

[Ouro9999]

Big yes

Enviado de meu SM-N910C usando Tapatalk

[superdog]

Only one of two watches I regret moving.

What a beauty. And looks great.

[GMT Aviator]

Love the watch, not loving the rubber B. But I'm probably in the minority with that one.

I just don't get the whole Rubber Band thing at all.

[173rdabn]

OOOOOH, that combo is slicker than snot on a doorknob!!! Beautiful

[LuminousMaximus]

you need SLR Dude to post a few of his pictures...

[downtorock]

Yay


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[roaddog359]

Originally Posted by SpyShops718

I think it is over priced. I like to have the band in gold not rubber. It reminds me of a rubber burger king watch and it will not hold value. Get a watch that has gold band and you can put the rubber ones on it as a daily and keep the gold one for dressing up.

I agree with this^^^^! If you can swing it, full gold and then rubber if you want. I am not a rubber guy!

[Quailhunter]

Overly black. Underlly gold.

[enjoythemusic]

Must agree about pricing, should be 16k msrp (12k street).

Daytona rose gold new on leather go for 21k, or a bit less so that's my guide. Feel that Rokex got their pricing a bit too high and why the YM in rg seem to be in abundance and at almost every store.

[CRDMMW]

Yes do it.








Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk