ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Etschell · 2 May 2017, 05:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lee fowler

Lug to lug is 50mm

wow. means i could wear it. same lug to lug as the subc.

sensui · 2 May 2017, 05:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Etschell

wow. means i could wear it. same lug to lug as the subc.

Yes I am intrigued as well, that actually measures a tad shorter than my largest watch that I think wears nicely. Interesting!

Chalet · 2 May 2017, 05:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lee fowler

Lug to lug is 50mm

That's good news. The old SD4000 had shorter lugs than the sub / GMT case. Glad they continued the tradition as this might yet fit me!

Thanks for posting. Great shots Lee.

skirsch · 2 May 2017, 05:14 AM

The Lug to Lug measurement would be great as that will give information related to how it will fit different sized wrists. Thanks

Etschell · 2 May 2017, 05:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sensui

Yes I am intrigued as well, that actually measures a tad shorter than my largest watch that I think wears nicely. Interesting!

yep, the pelagos is the same 42 MM but 50 mm lug to lug. so i can see how its possible with the lug structure.

Etschell · 2 May 2017, 05:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by skirsch

the lug to lug measurement would be great as that will give information related to how it will fit different sized wrists. Thanks

50 mm.

Etschell · 2 May 2017, 05:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sensui

Yes I am intrigued as well, that actually measures a tad shorter than my largest watch that I think wears nicely. Interesting!

how big is your wrist?

PanosI · 2 May 2017, 05:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Etschell

wow. means i could wear it. same lug to lug as the subc.

Lug to lug in the SubC is 47.2mm.

Ben.McDonald7 · 2 May 2017, 05:23 AM

Thanks for all of those measurements! The thickness seems quite reasonable at just over 15mm not including the cyclops.

sensui · 2 May 2017, 05:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Etschell

how big is your wrist?

6.5-6.7"....somewhere there. My largest watch would be the Grey Side of the Moon Speedmaster from Omega and I can barely pull that watch off.....if this watch contours directly.....I might barely pull it off.....but it's a bit of a stretch really. I know for a fact the normal 40mm Rolex past and present fit me far better.

Etschell · 2 May 2017, 05:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PanosI

Lug to lug in the SubC is 47.2mm.

you are correct. i never measured mine and just did. i think i read somewhere it was 50 MM. obviously wrong.

JP Chestnut · 2 May 2017, 05:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Etschell

you are correct. i never measured mine and just did. i think i read somewhere it was 50 MM. obviously wrong.

50MM is a pretty tall L2L watch. That would cut down on Sub sales.

PanosI · 2 May 2017, 05:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Etschell

you are correct. i never measured mine and just did. i think i read somewhere it was 50 MM. obviously wrong.

Found this pic on the internet for reference. Not my pic.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Etschell · 2 May 2017, 05:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JP Chestnut

50MM is a pretty tall L2L watch. That would cut down on Sub sales.

yes i agree. however, the tapering of the lugs effects wear ability.

Etschell · 2 May 2017, 05:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PanosI

Found this pic on the internet for reference. Not my pic.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

im measuring 48 exactly on a ruler.

Maxy · 2 May 2017, 05:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PanosI

Found this pic on the internet for reference. Not my pic.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Great pic and this will help Lee to cross check his measurements against.

faz · 2 May 2017, 05:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PanosI

Lug to lug in the SubC is 47.2mm.

Seems close to the 5 digit sub too. Not my most scientific measurement, but using a regular desk ruler, I just measured my 5 digit bluesy lug to lug to be 47 mm.

Calipers are great for decimal point level accuracy, but I think a good old desk ruler is good enough alternative for general human wrist proportion comparisons.

ap1 · 2 May 2017, 06:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by G'ed

Dial diameter
Bezel diameter
Lug to lug
Lug width
Clasp width
Case thickness (excluding cyclop)
Case thickness (just the main case exclude crystal or case back)
Crown diameter

Amongst others

breitlings · 2 May 2017, 06:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lee fowler

4 to 10 approx. 43.5mm

Thank you Sir!

Boaters · 2 May 2017, 06:29 AM

Thanks Lee really appreciate it

MCOSUB · 2 May 2017, 06:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Etschell

you are correct. i never measured mine and just did. i think i read somewhere it was 50 MM. obviously wrong.

Yes, there were photos taken on one of the other threads and you can see the lug to lug on the SD50 is clearly bigger than the Subc

WAK4 · 2 May 2017, 06:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lee fowler

. I bloody love it Cyclops and all!!!!

Awesome!

MCOSUB · 2 May 2017, 06:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PanosI

Found this pic on the internet for reference. Not my pic.

Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

Lee said the Dial on the SD50 is 27mm..............didnt think the dial would be smaller than a Subc.

SeaDweller50 · 2 May 2017, 06:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MCOSUB

Lee said the Dial on the SD50 is 27mm..............didnt think the dial would be smaller than a Subc.

Dials are identical. Only the font has been changed. SubC-GMTC-SD4K-DSSD = All same.

MCOSUB · 2 May 2017, 06:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Airborne

Dials are identical. Only the font has been changed. SubC-GMTC-SD4K-DSSD = All same.

the dial diameter in the photo in this thread for the Subc is 29.5. Lee measured the dial on the SD50 at 27?

SeaDweller50 · 2 May 2017, 07:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MCOSUB

the dial diameter in the photo in this thread for the Subc is 29.5. Lee measured the dial on the SD50 at 27?

So you actually believe this measurement then?

MCOSUB · 2 May 2017, 07:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Airborne

So you actually believe this measurement then?

I shouldn't believe the guy that owns the watch and has the calipers in his hand?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

lee fowler · 2 May 2017, 07:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MCOSUB

I shouldn't believe the guy that owns the watch and has the calipers in his hand?

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

The dial at the bottom of the rehaut measures approx. 27mm. I have just checked it again.

watchwatcher · 2 May 2017, 07:23 AM

Thanks, Lee and congrats again.

Speed · 2 May 2017, 09:39 AM

Thanks Lee. Enjoy your watch. The late posters need to scroll up.

2 May 2017, 05:14 AM	#34
skirsch Banned Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: Massachusetts Posts: 236	Lug To Lug The Lug to Lug measurement would be great as that will give information related to how it will fit different sized wrists. Thanks

2 May 2017, 05:23 AM	#39
Ben.McDonald7 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2017 Location: Arizona Watch: Rolex 116500LN Posts: 823	Thanks for all of those measurements! The thickness seems quite reasonable at just over 15mm not including the cyclops. __________________ Philippians 3:13-14 Ω Omega Speedmaster Pro Ω Omega Seamaster Aqua Terra Good Planet LE Rolex Daytona 116500LN Rolex Submariner Date 126610LV Rolex Explorer II 16570

2 May 2017, 06:29 AM	#50
Boaters 2025 Pledge Member Join Date: May 2015 Real Name: Mike Location: Pacific Northwest Watch: 126710BLR 116610LV Posts: 10,664	Thanks Lee really appreciate it

2 May 2017, 07:23 AM	#59
watchwatcher "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Real Name: Larry Location: Kentucky Watch: Yes Posts: 35,197	Thanks, Lee and congrats again.

2 May 2017, 09:39 AM	#60
Speed "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: USA Posts: 19,741	Thanks Lee. Enjoy your watch. The late posters need to scroll up.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)