![]() |
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
![]() |
#31 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Real Name: John
Location: Canada, eh
Watch: can I?
Posts: 6,240
|
I used to check the accuracy, but don't care now.
I change watches every day, so usually have to reset them at some point during the week. Only two I keep running 24/7, and might adjust the time onc/month
__________________
Something witty to go here. Member # 293 ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#32 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Todd
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 37
|
Quote:
If everyone on here added up their lost seconds and combined with those who gained seconds, I'll bet you'd find that we're all keeping perfect, or at least almost perfect time, with our mechanical Rolexes. Just a thought. Also, the time it takes me to look at my watch to check its accuracy far exceeds any loss or gain in seconds that I'm going to worry about. By the time I figure out the loss or gain, I've already lost several more seconds. As far as checking my phone for the correct time goes, I have a Blackberry on which I have to manually update the time using the server. It is often off by about a minute when I change time zones and turn it on after a flight. For something that is supposed to be part computer and digital, etc., it keeps lousy time. Just my 2 or 3 cents, give or take a few cents depending on how long it took you to read this. ![]()
__________________
This space intentionally left blank. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#33 | |
2025 TitaniumYM Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 37,740
|
Quote:
![]() ![]()
__________________
E |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#34 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Real Name: Scott
Location: UK
Watch: 1665/16610lv/16600
Posts: 101
|
LOL - they should buy a fupping quartz watch then - if it';s well outside COSC adn in warrantyl thouhg - I'd send it back for regulating!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#35 |
2025 TitaniumYM Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: New Mexico
Watch: 14060M
Posts: 34,480
|
I want my watches to perform within published specifications.
To determine that requires some observation over a period of time. I don't expect my $5000 Rolex Explorer to keep time as well as my $30 Casio Waveceptor, but as long as both are performng as promised, I'm happy. Right now, my Explorer is gaining an average of about 7.5 seconds per day, roughly 2.5 seconds faster than COSC standards. I'm not overly concerned about that, but in about two weeks, if it has not slowed down a bit, I'll get it adjusted. Rolex Explorer ![]() Casio Waveceptor ![]() Yes, I love them both equally. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#36 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: montreal
Posts: 459
|
I don't check it either. The only time I had a watch regulated was when it was losing 4-5mins a day! by the end of the week I would be late for everything... LOL.
A few seconds here or there don't matter... to me anyways. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.