ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
30 March 2009, 01:00 PM | #31 |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2008
Real Name: Greg Dolley
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: Rose Gold Daytona
Posts: 1,283
|
The BH service center is now closed.
|
30 March 2009, 01:38 PM | #32 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Huntington Beach
Watch: Rolex/Omega/Seiko
Posts: 2,560
|
Quote:
I know some guys (and have read about dozen others) that worked for large shops, huge racing teams & corporate businesses with VERY deep pockets. They learned a lot and became true experts on many different aspects of automobiles (be it engines, tuning chassis/suspension, brakes, ect). Eventually, they broke away from the "Big Bizz" and decided to start their own niche shops...and you know what, people lined up around the block to pay them to work on their rides and take advantage of the years of knowledge they acquired when the "Big Boys" were giving them a pay check. With that in mind, I see no reason why the same can't be true for watchmakers & therefore I'm sure there are probably some very talented guys working independently. |
|
30 March 2009, 02:12 PM | #33 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Virginia, USA
Posts: 593
|
Quote:
|
|
30 March 2009, 09:26 PM | #34 | |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2008
Real Name: Greg Dolley
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: Rose Gold Daytona
Posts: 1,283
|
Quote:
Another example - I had one of my gold rings re-sized recently and when I got it back, I could see firescale on the inside of the shank and the jeweler's re-polish job was horrible (looked worse than before I brought it in). So I had him remove the firescale and redo the buffing. The firescale was removed, but the polish job was still pretty bad. Not wanting to complain a third time, I simply went home and rebuffed the ring myself on my own equipment. Customers shouldn't have to do this! Why should I have to correct the mistakes of the jeweler?! Ugh! I guess there are so few people that take pride in their work these days... Also so few people that will treat your stuff like their own. -Greg |
|
30 March 2009, 09:33 PM | #35 | |
TRF Moderator & SubLV41 2024 Patron
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: .
Watch: 126610LN
Posts: 35,510
|
Quote:
Would you care to elaborate on how they marked them up and what they did, if anything to make it right? I'm just curious, as it should be another week to ten days until I get mine back.
__________________
JJ |
|
31 March 2009, 02:36 AM | #36 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Real Name: Mark
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: 5513
Posts: 2,192
|
Greg, in my case, I can recall going to RSC NY as long ago as 1970. For decades, the service was top notch. It's only relatively recently that issues have cropped up. So, we are commenting on a decline in good service and not a good service that never existed.
Quote:
|
|
31 March 2009, 02:54 AM | #37 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Real Name: Mark
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: 5513
Posts: 2,192
|
Paulie, to be fair and to be exact, the marks were on the casebacks. The kind of marks that might derive from setting a case in a vice or using a caseback wrench. I left in disgust and did not give them the chance to "make it good." They were new watches and it bugged me. Perhaps I am too demanding.
Others have reported having wonderful experiences at RSC BH. A few said that they walked in off the street and had their +/- 2 watches regulated and everything went great. But every time I talked to that woman behind the counter about the accuracy of my watches, she told me that they were running within COSC and then looked at me like I was an imbecile. Go figure. It's hit and miss. This can be frustrating because we have been spoiled by instances of superlative service at RSC in the past. I don't know what I will do in the future, but if Rolex merges with another company, or undergoes a takeover, I'm going to buy a few pre-takeover pieces before any more changes take place. |
31 March 2009, 07:37 PM | #38 | |
TRF Moderator & SubLV41 2024 Patron
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: .
Watch: 126610LN
Posts: 35,510
|
I don't think you're being too demanding at all. It isn't like these watches are inexpensive, so I don't think they should have been returned to you in that condition.
Quote:
__________________
JJ |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.