ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
19 November 2017, 08:08 AM | #31 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,368
|
Bluesy for sure, must admit I am losing interest in the general Omega aesthetic.
|
19 November 2017, 11:28 AM | #32 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Shanghai
Watch: 16610
Posts: 206
|
Quote:
There seem a strong interest in the Bluesy bringing "something" the Moonwatch doesn't bring enough (something blue maybe). Owners seem to love their Bluesy beyond other watches over time. Surprisingly it's quite hard to find, and even more surprisingly I really rarely see it on the wrists compared to other TT like the GMTII. Maybe Rolex maintain low production to maintain that appeal... Pricewise the Speedmaster Moonphase is quite overpriced compared to other Speedmasters. Quite a price gap actually. Here in Asia the black or blue SS generally sells just 20% below the Bluesy. And the TT Moonphase is actually more expensive that the Bluesy, for much less precious metal in there. Somehow Omega wants to place it in a higher level league, maybe to grab some Rolex market shares in that range. But they are easier to find (means higher volume) - which could be due to unsuccessful sales due to missing the price target of their usual crowd... |
|
19 November 2017, 11:48 AM | #33 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: earth
Watch: Bluesy
Posts: 865
|
I agree with you I think the moon phase is over priced. That is what has stopped me from picking one up. For the money they want I would rather get a rolex.
|
19 November 2017, 12:03 PM | #34 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Here
Watch: SpeedyPro Explorer
Posts: 235
|
I really like that Speedmaster Moonphase, but at 44 mm it’s too big for me.
In my opinion the Moonphase is more expensive because it has more complications than the Bluesy. It has chronograph, date and moonphase. I really love this last complication. I’m an amateur astronomer and knowing how old the moon is, is useful when planning to spend time under the starry sky. So between these two, it’s Moonphase for me. |
19 November 2017, 01:03 PM | #35 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2015
Real Name: Mike
Location: Pacific Northwest
Watch: 116610LV 16710 SD
Posts: 10,653
|
Speedy is awesome ... but the Bluesy would get my vote.
|
19 November 2017, 02:23 PM | #36 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Here.
Watch: iPhone
Posts: 470
|
Which has better resale. There’s your answer. (Sub)
|
19 November 2017, 02:24 PM | #37 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2016
Real Name: Patrick
Location: CA
Watch: 118206
Posts: 150
|
I was in the Omega Boutique a few hours ago to try on a few Speedmasters because I'm looking for a daily beater.
From 2004 up to a few months ago before I purchased my 118206 , I've worn a WG DD almost everyday and, on other days, I wore a vintage Hamilton Pacer. I tried on two watches: the 1957 and the regular manual Speedmaster. I've been interested in the Speedmaster for at least 20 years. I was absolutely disappointed. The '57 looked and felt like a cheap, lightweight. The regular Speedmaster seemed a little better, but I did not see $5k. I'd get the Blusey everyday of the week and I REALLY wanted a Speedmaster. |
19 November 2017, 03:01 PM | #38 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: USA
Posts: 6,246
|
I’m not a two-tone fan, but if you are then go bluesy and pickup a “regular” (hesalite) Speedy Pro later for <$4k from a TS. It’s my most recent acquisition and I absolutely love it .
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro |
19 November 2017, 03:06 PM | #39 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: US/China
Posts: 40
|
|
19 November 2017, 06:54 PM | #40 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Shanghai
Watch: 16610
Posts: 206
|
Quote:
|
|
19 November 2017, 09:58 PM | #41 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Real Name: Guy Gadbois
Location: Norcal
Watch: Rolex,Omega,Seiko
Posts: 1,759
|
Over time, get both That's my plan anyhow. Bluesy down, speedy to go!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Day-Date President, Datejust (flipped), Bluesy 16613, Omega 14kt Seamaster, Seiko Cocktail Time, Seiko Alpinist, REC 901-2 (Porsche 911), REC TTT Escape (Steve McQueen Triumph). A few Bulovas, cars, and fountain pens |
19 November 2017, 10:53 PM | #42 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2017
Real Name: Robert
Location: Northern NJ
Watch: 16710 BLRO
Posts: 3,064
|
It’s not hard to find a 44mm Speedmaster for thousands below retail. Compared to the Speedmaster Pro (42mm) the co-axial models are priced high (at retail).
__________________
Rolex GMT Master II BLRO 16710 Omega Speedmaster Co-Axial Chrono |
19 November 2017, 10:59 PM | #43 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: North Carolina
Watch: Rolex/Others
Posts: 47,598
|
I think that they are both great watches but the Omega is significantly over priced if you are buying from the Boutique or AD without a significant discount, 30-40%. The 116613LB is a classic watch and while you will pay for it, the values are consistent. I would look for a slightly preowned TT Submariner that is complete with box, papers and active warranty and save thousands and be in a solid position for a future trade or sell. Contact a few TS and see what they can get you the Omega for. You will be surprised how much off they can do. But ask them what they would give you on a trade back when the watch is used. It will hurt your feelings with the value lost, even when you bought right. I bought a Speed Master 44.25 on the bracelet and have been very pleased. But I was able to purchase from a TS for the low 4k price. Almost 5k off retail on a preowned piece. I would get the TT Submariner, find a Speed Master that works, pre-owned, and you will have a great two watches.
|
19 November 2017, 11:50 PM | #44 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Mexico
Watch: 1975 Explorer II
Posts: 123
|
I think 95% people here will be biased towards the Bluesy
|
20 November 2017, 12:51 AM | #45 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Shanghai
Watch: 16610
Posts: 206
|
Quote:
|
|
20 November 2017, 12:54 AM | #46 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Shanghai
Watch: 16610
Posts: 206
|
|
20 November 2017, 01:02 AM | #47 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Real Name: Josh
Location: Lost in time
Watch: Me Nae Nae
Posts: 9,823
|
Have you considered the Speedy Pro Moonphase? It’s super thin and 42mm. It wears like a traditional Speedy Pro (because it basically is with a modified movement).
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
"Sometimes the songs that we hear are just songs of our own." -Jerome J. Garcia, Robert C. Hunter |
20 November 2017, 01:19 AM | #48 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2016
Real Name: Patrick
Location: CA
Watch: 118206
Posts: 150
|
Quote:
Regarding your DJ41 and Sky Dweller analogy, I get it, but that's not my issue with the Omegas. My comments were less about fit on my wrist or fitness for a particular purpose and more about how each feels and looks at their relatively high price points. Neither the DJ nor the SD feels or looks like a toy. I will, however, give it another look...just because I really, really love how it looks. |
|
20 November 2017, 01:23 AM | #49 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Missouri USA
Watch: Daytona C white
Posts: 2,248
|
If I were going Speedmaster I would go good ole Speedy Pro! The Bluesy is just cool and beautiful and would get my vote in this stand off.
|
20 November 2017, 01:27 AM | #50 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Mars
Posts: 1,683
|
I'd go with 116613lb. That's not saying I don't like the Omega Speedmasyer moon phase. I've tried it on and I loved it but the sub will always be a winner to me
__________________
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.