![]() |
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
![]() |
#31 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: N/A
Posts: 600
|
Quote:
Nothing wrong with the 15450 ofcource but you need real slim wrists for it. <6,25 and it will look great. But if bigger you should be looking at a 15300/15202/15400/500 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#32 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Atlanta
Watch: No Rolex
Posts: 722
|
It’s individual preference, but the 15450 looked fine on my 6.75” wrist. I prefer and chose the 15202, but the 15450 looks great on most wrists.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#33 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: N/A
Posts: 600
|
Quote:
The 15450 however was way to small for me and felt like i was wearing my wifes watch. I bought the 15450 thinking it would wear like a Daytona and had to get the 15400 afterworths. I can pull the 15400 size but only with short sleeves. Still have the 15450 in my safe to flip some day. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#34 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: Singapore
Watch: 16710 BLRO
Posts: 836
|
Hi guys,
Just wondering if the bracelet has any micro adjustment on it.
__________________
Rolex Only Please ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#35 | ||
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Atlanta
Watch: No Rolex
Posts: 722
|
Quote:
Quote:
Ok, you’re right and I’m wrong. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#36 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: N/A
Posts: 600
|
A picture says more than a thousand words. The 15450 is fine for slim wrists but its small and wears (to) small on an average size wrist. Individual preference for smaller or bigger watches has not much to do with it. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#37 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2016
Location: NE
Posts: 2,907
|
![]() Sub 6.5in wrist. I think it is perfect for me. Bottom line, it all depends on shape and size of wrist. Not all 6.5-7in wrist are the same. Try it out for yourself before you read internet “experts” opinions Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Instagram @awristcheck |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#38 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: bklyn
Posts: 1,471
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#39 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Atlanta
Watch: No Rolex
Posts: 722
|
Quote:
Looks great in all of these wristshots! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#40 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: US
Posts: 384
|
Quote:
Is this a too small picture? Proportions look flawless in this picture. Like perfect. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#41 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Canada
Posts: 375
|
Posted this in the other thread as well, but for those who might be curious, here is the fit of the 15300 vs the 15450 on a 6.25” wrist (notice the lug overhang). The 15450 is a perfect fit for smaller wrists IMO
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#42 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Family first
Posts: 653
|
15450 - comparisons
15450 on a 6.5” wrist:
![]() ![]() ![]() Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#43 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Atlanta
Watch: No Rolex
Posts: 722
|
While I agree that the 41” Royal Oaks look too large on very small wrists (in my opinion) , I think the concern over lug overhang and lug gap can be a bit overblown. Due to the lug flare and lack of micro adjustments, Royal Oaks are not often the best fitting watch in a WIS’s collection.
But they still look marvelous. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#44 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Real Name: steve
Location: sydney
Watch: SMURF
Posts: 653
|
i often feel my 15400 is too big (white dial too) on my 6.5 inch wrist. the 15450 looks incredible in these photos. i can see that for some it might just be too small though and i think that will vary from wrist to wrist and won't necessarily correlate to wrist size but perhaps wrist shape.
so for example i'd expect 6.5 inch wrist but v flat to maybe not be happy with 15450. but i'm not super flat so i think it might work for me. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#45 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2018
Real Name: Joyce
Location: SF and NYC
Watch: GMT, AP, DD,
Posts: 642
|
Quote:
Hahaha. Fashion fades style is eternal!!
__________________
IG @crownthewatch |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#46 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Philippines
Posts: 1,823
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#47 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Philippines
Posts: 1,823
|
The 450 is a size enigma by itself. It wears big for a 37 but it does not look big side by side to a DD36, as seen in the OP’s picture.
Here’s mine. With all the included links fitted, it is an exact fit on my 6.5” wrist. I may even need to buy one more link. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#48 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Philippines
Posts: 1,823
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#49 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Planet Earth.
Posts: 582
|
![]() Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#50 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: N/A
Posts: 600
|
Quote:
Im not in to big watches. I love my daytona, exp39,blro etc. All mid-size watches and i never question the size. Even a DJ 36 looks ok on my 7+. The 15450 is a realy strange watch do sizewise. I think its because the royal oak is designed to be/look bigger and bolder while the 37mm gives it a more refined look. Guess its all about proportions. I have the 15400 now. It wears big all right but manageable: ![]() Verstuurd vanaf mijn BBB100-2 met Tapatalk |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#51 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: West Coast
Posts: 2,367
|
Some pics for reference. Perfect size for me with a 6.3 inch wrist
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#52 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: USA
Posts: 128
|
Here's the 450 on another 7 1/8 inch wrist.
I tried to take the photos from a distance to get a more accurate perspective. ![]() ![]() ![]() Ghost for comparison. Loved it. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#53 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 6
|
Looking at some of those white dials I may have to reconsider looking for a white dial AP instead of the hard to get blue dial. I thought it may look to dressy but seems to be okay in a casual setting.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#54 | |
2025 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Real Name: marc
Location: nyc
Posts: 1,367
|
Quote:
![]() ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#55 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: USA
Posts: 128
|
Quote:
Spicy |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#56 |
2025 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Real Name: marc
Location: nyc
Posts: 1,367
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#57 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Atlanta
Watch: No Rolex
Posts: 722
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#58 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Dallas/Palm Beach
Posts: 149
|
![]() This one was my choice from the 37mm line. The extra depth on the dial from being skeletonized makes it wear/appear just a tad bit larger. Very happy with it. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#59 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2019
Location: London
Posts: 265
|
The 15450 is a female's watch, one can actually tell from the pictures posted on this thread.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#60 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Canada
Posts: 375
|
^ by that principle, the Paul Newman Daytona must also be a ladies watch as well
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.