ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
30 December 2008, 01:29 PM | #31 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: STAN
Location: KY-USA
Watch: Rolex Prez
Posts: 12,583
|
...Freddie...
...WELL SAID.
...X-2! Stan. |
30 December 2008, 01:50 PM | #32 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Real Name: Louie
Location: CDC/FCGC
Watch: 116619LB
Posts: 1,321
|
Quote:
Talk about a turn of events never seen before, wiping out $$$$$$$'s. Cash is good now, gold bullion is a must for 2009. |
|
30 December 2008, 02:04 PM | #33 |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Toronto, Canada
Watch: Deepsea
Posts: 521
|
I've had this discussion with many people. The ones who always lose are the cigarette-smokers.
I have a buddy of mine who's pretty much a half-pack a day smoker. I've asked him to estimate what he spends in a year on smokes. I believe the figure he gave me was something like $3500 a year. I've told him had he saved that money he could have had a nice watch, a car, or a trip. I find that both genders tend to frown on my expensive watch. 1. Women because they figure I should be spending it on what else......a woman. 2. Men, because they believe I should be spending it on a woman. |
30 December 2008, 02:13 PM | #34 |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Anastasios
Location: Athens Greece
Watch: Rolex GMT 1675
Posts: 8,497
|
...Wanna buy a watch...???....Or what...?....
|
30 December 2008, 02:26 PM | #35 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: John Eaton
Location: Nome Alaska USA
Watch: Red1680 metres 1st
Posts: 1,869
|
Quote:
In my opinion: Agreed... Cash is king Now Gold will be king next 1 to 4 years But wait longer than that to flip your Rolex And yes, Anastasios, I do want to buy a watch
__________________
Perfection lies not in the organic whole but in the isolated fragment |
|
30 December 2008, 02:53 PM | #36 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Melbourne, AU
Watch: Pepsi
Posts: 4,370
|
Guys you reckon gold still got legs?
|
30 December 2008, 03:19 PM | #37 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: John Eaton
Location: Nome Alaska USA
Watch: Red1680 metres 1st
Posts: 1,869
|
YOU AIN'T SEEN NOTHING YET
It is impossible to drop eight plus trillion of fiat and not have inflation... I stated on this forum months ago I don't want to see what it feels like to live in a world where the DOW and Gold are 3000; I hope I'm at worse case scenario there. But I am thinking gold will hit at least $1500/oz before we see economy and jobs stabilize. JMHO
__________________
Perfection lies not in the organic whole but in the isolated fragment |
30 December 2008, 04:14 PM | #38 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Martin
Location: Home and Away
Watch: you? "YES PLEASE"!
Posts: 3,716
|
sometimes holidays are just stress!
__________________
it's not just about telling the time... happy rolexing... I'm just a man with a passion
|
30 December 2008, 10:41 PM | #39 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Real Name: Dick
Location: USA
Watch: SubND,DD,SSDaytona
Posts: 2,257
|
Quote:
__________________
“The only reason for time ....................... is so that everything doesn't happen at once." Albert Einstein |
|
30 December 2008, 11:04 PM | #40 |
Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: N/a
Location: N/a
Watch: N/a
Posts: 55
|
|
31 December 2008, 02:18 AM | #41 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 831
|
This is the reason why we don't have the M5 park in the garage. Three years from now my ss daytona might drop another thousand or so but not with the BMW.
Buy gold and/or land is the answer. |
31 December 2008, 02:55 AM | #42 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2007
Real Name: Matt
Location: Arlington, VA
Watch: Lange One MP
Posts: 4,043
|
I'm guilt free about all of my purchases, so I don't spend hours comparing depreciation of automobiles to watches (last I checked you can't drive to work on a Rolex though) or trying to measures in the intangible pleasures of travel to a material possession.
I suggest we make the OP sticky though. It would be perfect "ammo" and "medicine" for those starting the never ending neurotic threads (like this one) justifying the purchase to themselves or asking about what they should say / think when their friends, co-workers OR SPOUSES, make snide remarks about their fancy new watches. |
31 December 2008, 03:21 AM | #43 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Erik
Location: Clayton, NC
Watch: Datejust
Posts: 322
|
I walked out of the Toyota dealership having paid $25,300 for my Toyota Prius (all taxes/registration included). I probably could have gotten a $13,000 base model Corolla (maybe out the door for $10k less), but the fact is it would not have made driving the cheaper car any more enjoyable even if I had a Daytona on my wrist if I took the difference.
Granted, my watch spends about nearly 24 hours a day on my wrist, it is honestly secondary to all of those things that you mentioned. We spend a considerable amount of our lifetime on our furniture, in our car, and remembering our trips. What kind of life have you lived if all you can reflect on is a bunch of watches that you bought rather than experiencing life itself? I would not hesitate to take a $6,000 vacation with my wife over buying a new Rolex. I would not hesitate to refurnish my house with $6,000 over buying a new Rolex. I would not purchase a vehicle that was $6,000 less nice, over buying a new Rolex. In any of those situations, if I bought a new Rolex, I'd have a pissed off wife who could have had a nice vacation, a lot of nice new furniture, or a much nicer car. Who cares about depreciation? Does everything you do in life have to focus on cost? Don't you remember those Mastercard commercials? 6 round trip tickets to Barbados - $6,000, Room/Board/Activities - $4,000, spending time with your loved ones - PRICELESS? |
31 December 2008, 03:28 AM | #44 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Jason
Location: Providence, RI
Posts: 175
|
I like Silver more than Gold in 2009.
|
31 December 2008, 03:47 AM | #45 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: San Francisco
Watch: Submariner
Posts: 2,480
|
It doesn't have to be an either or thing. It would be foolish to spend all of your money on multiple watches and not travel and enjoy all of the other opportunities such as buying a house, etc. By the same token, when you do have the money, there is nothing better than getting your first really nice watch. I was into my thirties and it was worth the wait for both. For me, it is really about balance. Having several nice thing and not overloading on any one.
__________________
____________________________________________ Rolex Blue TT Submariner Rolex SS Submariner Breitling Emergency Mission **They are just watches, wear 'em.** ____________________________________________ |
31 December 2008, 04:10 AM | #46 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Mike
Location: NW England
Posts: 791
|
Quote:
I don't want to spend any more than I already have on watches. Regards Mike. |
|
31 December 2008, 04:20 AM | #47 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: The Motor City
Watch: too many
Posts: 1,114
|
If I had $30,000 to spend on transportation - I would get a $20,000 awesome motorcycle and a used $10,000 car.
I know it's stupid, but everyone has their priorities on what is most important when it comes to money. So if someone wants to blow $100,000 on a Paul Newman Daytona, $75,000 on a car; I say good for them! |
31 December 2008, 04:49 AM | #48 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Brian
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 268
|
Quote:
My story, somewhere around 1978 or 79 I almost bought a TT DJ, it was maybe 900.00? Instead I bought a Seiko for 200. What a bad decision. |
|
31 December 2008, 07:01 AM | #49 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2008
Real Name: Walt
Location: Minneapolis
Watch: Savings Vaporize
Posts: 268
|
I agree as well. This year I bought two pre owned Rolex watches from an AD, one for myself and one for my wife. Compared to my investment portfolio, that has lost 30% this year, the watches have held their own. No regrets!
|
31 December 2008, 08:44 AM | #50 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: B
Location: UK
Posts: 976
|
As others have said, its all about balance. Nice watches are meant to be an enrichment to life, rather than a replacement for living life.
Wearing a nice watch whilst on holiday, at an event, etc just makes the time spent more memorable and the watch more meaningful to you
__________________
Current: 1: Rolex DSSD M 2008 2: Rolex Day-Date 40 YG White Dial Random 2018 3:Panerai Luminor Submersible Titanium PAM 25 2013 P Previous:[/B] 1: Rolex 16610 Y 2002 2: Rolex Daytona V 2008 3: Rolex 16610LV Z 2007 4: Rolex Milgauss 116400GV V 2008 5: Panerai Luminor Marina PR PAM 93 2005 6: AP ROO Diver H 2013 7: Rolex DJ II Slate w/ Grn Romans Random 2013 8:Panerai Submersible Ti PAM 25 2013 |
31 December 2008, 11:33 AM | #51 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: US
Posts: 1,999
|
Quote:
PS - Greg I dress like a bum too, alot of people probably think my watch is fake. |
|
31 December 2008, 12:23 PM | #52 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Beverly Hills, CA
Watch: Yachtmaster
Posts: 3,949
|
I agree in part with the OP and in part with others commenting. It all depends on your perspective, and what you can afford. It is helpful to always look at the opportunity cost of something, whether it's a child's birthday party, going out to dinner, financing a college education, traveling, or buying a car. I live within my means, but also enjoy what I can afford.
I don't drive an ultra-luxury car (no Porsche Cayenne or BMW 7 series for me) but I have had a MBZ (C-class) and currently have an Acura MDX. They have both been very pleasant to drive, and are safe for my kids. Frankly I have enjoyed having leather seats and other creature comforts. When I was in college, I owned a stripped-down Toyota Tercel with hand-crank windows, no A/C, and cheesy cloth-covered seats. That's all I could afford then, and there was no shame in owning it. I graduated from college and law school without debt, in great measure because I didn't outspend my means. That being said, I prefer my luxury cars, just as I prefer my Rolex. While I don't have high-end designer clothing (e.g. from Neiman Marcus or Barney's), I do get most of my casual clothes from Nordstrom, not from J.C. Penney. All of my business suits are designed by me and custom made for me by a Hong Kong tailor. I realize that probably all of my clothes have zero resale value. But, in my line of work I'm just not going to wear a polyester outfit that I got from Target for $80. So, yeah, I easily could have bought a Daytona with the money that I've spent on clothes on the last 10 years. I fly coach and don't stay at the Four Seasons or Ritz Carlton when I travel, but I don't stay at the Motel 6, either. Spending money on travel, when you can afford it, is money well spent for the experiences and memories. I cherish my Rolex because we could afford to buy it. If we had gone into serious debt to buy it, then it wouldn't be worth it. |
31 December 2008, 12:37 PM | #53 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Real Name: Dick
Location: USA
Watch: SubND,DD,SSDaytona
Posts: 2,257
|
Quote:
This could've been written by my wife and I. Could not agree more.
__________________
“The only reason for time ....................... is so that everything doesn't happen at once." Albert Einstein |
|
31 December 2008, 01:10 PM | #54 |
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: PA
Posts: 3,478
|
Odd discussion.
I imagine most here to be relatively affluent. This is not an either or forum. Second base is not better than third or first. You gotta touch'em all. Happy New Year. Mrdi |
31 December 2008, 01:40 PM | #55 | |
Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Australia
Posts: 242
|
Quote:
I think along the lines of having 1 good house in a nice area (until i can afford more), 1 reliable car, 1 quality watch, 1 overseas holiday a year etc. Having multiple watches and constantly upgrading/changing cars, especially if not in a financial position to do so, seems excessive and not a good use of funds. I estimate my brother has spent over $100k on cars in the past few years and now only has the one average car to show for it and a large mortgage to boot. |
|
31 December 2008, 02:24 PM | #56 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Bill
Location: East Bay RI
Watch: GMT-II 16710LN
Posts: 12,067
|
My story is contrary to many of yours.
My wife and I have not really vacationed away since our honeymoon in '92. We rented for a few years and saved as much as we could, then had a baby, then bought a house etc. We do go away for a couple of weekends away every year or two. We were saving for a nice vacation but then my wife got a new job and couldn't get away for the trip so she took the vacation money and bought me my watch for our 15th anniversary gift. Maybe I don't have great trip memories etc. but I'll tell you what, when I look at my watch I see a loving sacrifice made by my wife and this watch is a symbol of that. I guess she thought that I was worth more than that trip as well. I agree with the OP that there are many things we spend $$ on and at the end of the year there is nothing to show for it. My older cars have been paid off for years and are considered low mileage. The smart thing to do is to keep them now and just use them. My house is small, efficient, well maintained and suitable for small family of 3. Not very impressive to many I'm sure but the fact pointed out by the OP is that the watch is still valuable as our consumerables become worthless. A wise man once said "Live within your means, not your dreams."
__________________
I bought a cheap watch from the crazy man Floating down canal It doesn't use numbers or moving hands It always just says "now" Now you may be thinking that I was had But this watch is never wrong And if I have trouble the warranty said Breathe In, Breathe Out, Move On J. Buffett Instagram: eastbayrider46 |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.