2.5x magnification

[kwingy]

I have had 3 BLNR's and all the mags varied. My 2nd one which was a 2014 one was perfect but the 1st (2013) and 3rd (2014) both had low magnifications. I would say yours is lower but still acceptable. It can really bug you though.

[KBM]

That doesn't look too bad.

Regarding being ok with a low mag piece, I wouldn't. I was never the biggest cyclops fan in the first place, so having a piece with a cyclops which didn't even serve its intended purpose would drive me nuts.

[Raku]

This is the new MWS infectious disease going around that makes it really hard for people to read the date. (Magnification Worry Syndrome if you are curious)

[Nikrnic]

Originally Posted by watchmaker

You were right. The sub's glass is thicker than the gmt (2mm vs 1.8mm).

I was corrected on that by a forum member too btw

Thanks, I thought so, makes sense

Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk