![]() |
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
View Poll Results: Which Offshore? | |||
Titanium 44mm ROO |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
64 | 54.24% |
Titanium 42mm ROO aka "Ghost" |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
44 | 37.29% |
Neither! |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
10 | 8.47% |
Voters: 118. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#31 |
2025 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: nicholas
Location: ottawa canada
Watch: Rolex,AP,Panerai
Posts: 10,559
|
I like the 44 for sure. If you can pull it off, that's the one with more wrist presence.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#32 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Taiwan
Posts: 39
|
I went for 42mm when both watches were available in the shop, because
1. 44mm is simply too large for my 6.8 inches wrist 2. Rarity. I guess 42mm will be more difficult to obtain because of its grey ceramic. I can get 15% discount for 44mm but maybe not for the Ghost. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#33 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Singapore
Posts: 6
|
Congrats, doesnt the vampire appeal to you?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#34 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Ash
Location: UK
Watch: AP Royal Oak
Posts: 4,544
|
Quote:
In the real world who even cares about an in house movement? I can understand a lot of enthusiasts here valuing it but the average buyer probably doesn’t even care. I’ve never once wished that my platinum 44 had a different movement, it’s accurate to + 2 seconds a day and that’s good enough for me. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#35 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Ben
Location: SIN & JKT
Watch: Rolex, AP, PP
Posts: 9,874
|
Quote:
I kind of agree. My AP ROC which is completely not in-house ( it has a F.Piguet movement ) has the best accuracy among my AP watches.
__________________
Follow me on Instagram : benlee789 ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#36 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Poker Table
Watch: Rolex, AP
Posts: 491
|
I voted 42 Ghost for 3 reasons
1) Size (small wrists) 2) Titanium bracelet available 3) No red (I actually love the red on just the watch itself but in a one or two watch collection I feel like the red would clash with too many outfits sticking out from under certain shirt and sweater colors where the Ghost wouldn't clash with anything. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#37 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: SNA
Posts: 3,646
|
44
I like the pushers more on the 44 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#38 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Austin TX
Posts: 2,121
|
Yea for me it’s not even a discussion of in house or not. That movement just looks tiny in a 42mm case, and even more so in the 44mm. It’s like you’re wearing 80% case and 20% movement. They can do better and likely will soon, because from the front it’s gorgeous. I’m dying to pick up a 44 ROO.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#39 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Ben
Location: SIN & JKT
Watch: Rolex, AP, PP
Posts: 9,874
|
Decided to get neither. Grey just not for me. Besides SIHH is near.
__________________
Follow me on Instagram : benlee789 ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#40 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Toronto
Posts: 640
|
44sure
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#41 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: New York
Posts: 22
|
44.... the other looks too plain. So much detail in the 44 makes it a winner. Especially with the fire colored time hands
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#42 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Canada
Posts: 748
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#43 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: HK
Posts: 2,290
|
+1
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#44 | |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: Sam
Location: UK
Watch: AP ☠️
Posts: 6,151
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#45 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Canada
Posts: 748
|
Yeah taking the easy way out - why develop an integrated chrono while off the shelf one is readily available.
I'm surprised AP is categorized as one of the holly trinity while they have no in-house chrono. ALS should replace them. All AP makes is pretty cases and fine finishing. I know plenty of AP fans here but charging a premium for pretty face doesn't cut it anymore. Heart is where it's at. I'm switching to Patek (5170P/5320G) and ALS (Dato up/down) which are masterpieces. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#46 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Canada
Posts: 748
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#47 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Texas
Watch: Rolex/JLC/AP
Posts: 216
|
Quote:
To each his/her own. Wouldn’t trade my APs, which are much more my style and extremely accurate, reliable timekeepers, when or whether chronograph functions are being used. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#48 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Mr. H
Location: Dallas
Watch: them for me!
Posts: 7,180
|
I own the 26400IO in 44 mm and I'd take it over the Grey Ghost Monochrome any day. The watch is more balanced in terms of its color scheme and the red accents break the somewhat monotone look that an all grey Offshore has. However, as far as your wrist size I think the 42 mm might be a much better fit for you. Just my two cents.
__________________
WATCHES ARE THE NEW CURRENCY!/ MEMBER 27491/OFFICIALLY DESIGNATED OLD TIMER /AP OWNERS CLUB MEMBER Instagram @watchcollectinglifestyle |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#49 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: SoCal
Posts: 2,405
|
Ghost and 44 is too big
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#50 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Real Name: Jim
Location: Orange County, CA
Watch: Rolex, AP & Patek
Posts: 3,752
|
Quote:
![]() They needed a more cost effective chrono when they created the ROO so they used the base JLC 889 and DD module back when they owned 40% of JLC. I dont mind the modular chrono in the ROO at all. Its been there since the creation of the watch and the 3120 is an excellent base movement that's really good looking. I would like to see a base in house chrono in the ROC with a display back. We'll see if the chrono is ever launched in the "new line" and if it makes it to the ROC. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#51 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Real Name: Davide
Location: Italy
Watch: RO/ROO/PAM/DAYTONA
Posts: 402
|
42 is more wearable...
__________________
5167-5711 6217-8001 16520A-16520E-16500-116610LV-166710LN-16760-16030-16570T- ROO(Ti)-RO-ROC PAN0055-PAM351-PAM733-PAM721 Type XX-XXI |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#52 |
2025 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: Plenty
Posts: 259
|
I can’t wear the 44 so 42 for me. I’m on wait list.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#53 |
2025 Pledge Member
Join Date: May 2011
Real Name: Larry
Location: San Diego, CA
Watch: ROLEX
Posts: 25,867
|
Voted: Titanium 42mm ROO aka "Ghost"
44mm to big for me... come to think about it 42mm is to big for me too! ![]()
__________________
![]() ✦ 28238 President DD 18K/YG ✦ 16610LN SS Sub ✦ 16613 18K/SS Serti ✦ 16550 Exp II Non-Rail Cream Dial ✦ DaytonaC 116500 ✦ 126710 BLRO GMT-Master II ✦ M226627 42mm Titanium Yacht-Master ✦ NEXT-->? ⛳ Hole In One! 10/3/19 DMCC 5th hole, par 3, 168 yards w/ 4-Iron. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.