ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

mistermann · 7 November 2018, 02:08 AM

You can make it fit under your wrist cuff just fine.

Or just let that bad boy out to breathe.

arizonapaul · 7 November 2018, 02:28 AM

SD4K for sure. I own them both and the SD4K is almost sacred now that it has been replaced with the new SD43.
I actually hardly ever wear it anymore because its now an investment piece for me and I want to keep it perfect.
I also own the SD43, so i do have choices, but the 116600 is perfect in every way, go for it!!!

Devildog · 7 November 2018, 02:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HogwldFLTR

I love the LVC but love the 116600 more. Wear my SD a lot!!!

Maye be so with the 126600 but not the 116600. Mine has no issues what so ever. Are you from somewhere with legal weed?

The 116600 and 126600 are the same thickness Lee. Neither should pose a problem

Token74 · 7 November 2018, 02:56 AM

Sea Dweller for me. Never seen another in the wild which is one of my main criteria when buying a watch. Whereas three people I work with have LV subs (which i accept of course is a sign that they are more popular than the SD).

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

superstarmar · 7 November 2018, 03:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by arizonapaul

SD4K for sure. I own them both and the SD4K is almost sacred now that it has been replaced with the new SD43.
I actually hardly ever wear it anymore because its now an investment piece for me and I want to keep it perfect.
I also own the SD43, so i do have choices, but the 116600 is perfect in every way, go for it!!!

While I don't have a SD43 , I do have the 116600...
Any day , time or minute over the Hulk...
Get The SD4K...

rw2008 · 7 November 2018, 04:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ljung

If this is your only Rolex, take the SD.
If you are looking for rotation, go for the LV.

This

HogwldFLTR · 7 November 2018, 01:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Devildog

The 116600 and 126600 are the same thickness Lee. Neither should pose a problem

The diameter difference makes a big difference. It's not all about thickness; the footprint counts too. I wear my 116600 with dress shirts all the time and never have had any problem.

Indepth · 7 November 2018, 01:08 PM

Having just pulled the trigger on a SD4K, I am biased, but I still think I'd take the SD4K over a Hulk.

I'm currently on the wait list for a Hulk at my AD but when the opportunity arose to pick up the 116600 I jumped because they're no longer made, so the chance of getting one at a good price anymore isn't likely. Whereas the Hulk is still produced so, in theory, easier to obtain.

Of course, now that I've said that the Hulk will get discontinued soon...

psv · 7 November 2018, 01:25 PM

The Sea-Dweller with the smaller lugs, matte dial, and no cyclops is one of the best looking modern Rolex watches.

Devildog · 8 November 2018, 01:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HogwldFLTR

The diameter difference makes a big difference. It's not all about thickness; the footprint counts too. I wear my 116600 with dress shirts all the time and never have had any problem.

Apologies Lee, I've never experienced any issues with the larger diameter. I hadn't released you have experienced problems with dress shirts and the SD43

doramas · 8 November 2018, 04:18 AM

Very complicated. I think the 116600

View Poll Results: Sea Dweller 4000K or Hulk
SD4K	66	53.23%
Submariner Hulk	58	46.77%
Voters: 124. You may not vote on this poll

7 November 2018, 02:28 AM	#32
arizonapaul "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2016 Real Name: Paul Location: Fountain Hills,Az Watch: All 3 Sea-Dwellers Posts: 975	SD4K for sure. I own them both and the SD4K is almost sacred now that it has been replaced with the new SD43. I actually hardly ever wear it anymore because its now an investment piece for me and I want to keep it perfect. I also own the SD43, so i do have choices, but the 116600 is perfect in every way, go for it!!! __________________ Rolex Sea-Dweller SD43 Rolex D-blue- Rolex Hulk Rolex TT Sub- Rolex SD4000 Omega Ploprof 1200 m Panerai 510 Panerai 785 set-NIB Rolex Airking

7 November 2018, 02:56 AM	#34
Token74 "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2012 Real Name: Vince Location: England Watch: Too many! Posts: 5,744	Sea Dweller for me. Never seen another in the wild which is one of my main criteria when buying a watch. Whereas three people I work with have LV subs (which i accept of course is a sign that they are more popular than the SD). Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk __________________ Time is limited, make every second count. Patek Philippe Nautilus 5990 - AP Royal Oak 15300 - AP Royal Oak 15450 Blue - AP Royal Oak 15450 Silver - AP Royal Oak Offshore 26480 - Royal Oak Offshore 15710 - Rolex Sea Dweller 116600 - Rolex Daytona 116519 - Rolex GMT 126710 BLRO - Omega Speedmaster Reduced - JLC Reverso GMT Moonphase - TAG Microtimer - Dent Pocket Watch - JLC Atmos Phases de lune

7 November 2018, 02:08 AM	#31
mistermann "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2015 Real Name: Drew Location: Iowa Watch: 116600 Posts: 496	You can make it fit under your wrist cuff just fine. Or just let that bad boy out to breathe.

7 November 2018, 01:08 PM	#38
Indepth "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2018 Location: CLE Posts: 76	Having just pulled the trigger on a SD4K, I am biased, but I still think I'd take the SD4K over a Hulk. I'm currently on the wait list for a Hulk at my AD but when the opportunity arose to pick up the 116600 I jumped because they're no longer made, so the chance of getting one at a good price anymore isn't likely. Whereas the Hulk is still produced so, in theory, easier to obtain. Of course, now that I've said that the Hulk will get discontinued soon...

7 November 2018, 01:25 PM	#39
psv 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Oct 2009 Location: USA & France Posts: 11,078	The Sea-Dweller with the smaller lugs, matte dial, and no cyclops is one of the best looking modern Rolex watches.

8 November 2018, 04:18 AM	#41
doramas Banned Join Date: Apr 2015 Location: Gran Canaria Posts: 3,469	Very complicated. I think the 116600

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)