ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
6 February 2009, 11:30 AM | #31 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Real Name: Trevor
Location: Arizona
Posts: 5,740
|
YES I think that I might really like that, I will wait and see.
__________________
My grails: |
6 February 2009, 11:46 AM | #32 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 2,596
|
I don't own any of the two, but I think the Explorer II white dial looks better.... just my
I'll probably get one by the end of the year if everything goes as plan.
__________________
______________________________ You can't turn back the clock. But you can wind it up again. |
6 February 2009, 11:54 AM | #33 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Florida, Canada
Watch: Rol/Seik/Tud/Omega
Posts: 30,244
|
|
6 February 2009, 11:56 AM | #34 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: North America
Watch: their hands, baby.
Posts: 1,116
|
Quote:
Chris |
|
6 February 2009, 12:42 PM | #35 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Russel
Location: N/A
Watch: N/A
Posts: 755
|
I haven't done any research, so I will add what my thoughts are based on what I've read on watch forums. The Explorer II is not as popular as the GMTIIs because it does not look like a Submariner.
You can hear people saying that the Triple-lock should be on the GMTs and the Expys, but then again, it's a functional device that's for divers in particular. The Expy II is the most underrated sports model. I like it coz it looks versatile and is clean and rugged. I have only ever spotted four explorer II's in the wild. I've seen many Subs and GMTs, so I guess people may not be aware/interested in the Exp II for this reason. Note: I am looking at buying a Submariner later, so I do love the look. |
6 February 2009, 02:28 PM | #36 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Colombia
Posts: 427
|
you know what I love about the white faced ExplorerII, when I in my car and direct sunlight hits the dial, the white shade in this watch is amazing!!!!
__________________
Pepsi GMT Master II (Z series)Sub 14060M COSC (M series) Platinum yatchmaster (random) JLC Master Compressor Chrono Sub-C (random) Sub C bluessy (random) IWC big pilot |
7 February 2009, 01:29 AM | #37 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Real Name: Simon
Location: England (Manc)
Watch: Explorer 11, BF
Posts: 268
|
Exp11 - Closest to the original spirit of Rolex. Durable, quietly understated and immensly practical in all situations....none of those gimmicky GMT fripperies for me
|
7 February 2009, 01:36 AM | #38 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: somewhere
Posts: 2,891
|
i've owned both and i like them both. i wish i never sold my explorer II polar
__________________
16 GS Titles 16 AMS titles (1 short of Agassi) 23 Consecutive GS semifinals 17/18 of the last GS finals, 237 consecutive weeks #1 5 consecutive wimbledon + 1 = 6 cups 5 consecutive US open 4 Australian open 1 Sweet french open a crown for every achievement The Greatest Of All Time loves Rolex |
7 February 2009, 01:40 AM | #39 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Real Name: Bubba
Location: Bitsyville!
Watch: Blue YM today!
Posts: 10,053
|
How about a look at a black dial Explorer.
|
7 February 2009, 01:47 AM | #40 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: USA
Watch: 216570 white
Posts: 521
|
I often wondered why anyone would buy a GMT II when the EXP II was less money. ;) As I recall, they had the same movement until recenty.
Actually, as others have said, and as it is in my case: the white dial, and the sleeker lower profile, fixed bexel. It is a more versatile watch, comfortably covering the entire range of activies from driving a desk, to lounging about the house or engaging in other weekend R&R activies, to sports activies near water, sand, dirt and rocks, plus travel outside of one's home time zone. I think it is the most well-balanced of the Rolexes from an aesthetic, comfort, function and size standpoint. It also is a stealthy watch, and not obviously a Rolex. Understated. I like the GMT II, but it seemed much bulkier, and the moving bezel was not a selling point (I have never had to keep track of three time zones). Plus, no white dial. |
7 February 2009, 01:53 AM | #41 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Todd (Richard)
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Watch: Deep Sea Sea Dwell
Posts: 535
|
im probably the only one on the site, but the explorer has always been my least favorite Rolex... i understand the uses etc, but the bezel does nothing for me personally..
__________________
2013 DSSD! (ME) M Series OP No Date,White Arabic,Smooth Bezel(WIFE) Yachtmaster 1 SS/PLAT (wife) |
7 February 2009, 02:09 AM | #42 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Clive
Location: Exoplanet
Watch: spring-driven
Posts: 38,856
|
I'm going to stick my stick out (a little) and predict that when the current Exp II is updated, it will become more desirable/collectable. In the same way as the previous Exp II.
In the meanwhile, some gratuitous black dial pics.......... Cheers
__________________
|
7 February 2009, 03:29 AM | #43 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: DC Area, USA
Watch: IIc,1680 Red,16660
Posts: 4,492
|
Quote:
The last trip I went on (last month) - I wore my MkII 3910 Vantage. |
|
7 February 2009, 08:47 AM | #44 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,494
|
And I see that you are standing at the north end of the Nevada Test Site with that fine Explorer........
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member |
7 February 2009, 10:19 AM | #45 | |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: California, US
Posts: 104
|
Quote:
nice photo |
|
7 February 2009, 12:17 PM | #46 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: DC Area, USA
Watch: IIc,1680 Red,16660
Posts: 4,492
|
|
7 February 2009, 12:55 PM | #47 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: north vancouver
Watch: 1680 / speedy pro
Posts: 474
|
My 16750 GMT is the best of both worlds - two time zones with the rotating bezel, quick set date, ruggedly handsome good looks, chip resistant plexi crystal.
I would like an explorer, but it's a bit hard to justify when you've got one of these.
__________________
1997 Speedmaster Pro: Hesalite, steel back, three dials and manual wind. The classic. 1969 Submariner 1680: Very refreshed - The diver. 1950's Milus: 18k gold, manual wind, no date - the dinner watch. Seiko 6309 The perfect watch for a trip to Mexico. |
7 February 2009, 02:28 PM | #48 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: David
Location: USA
Watch: your step!
Posts: 7,882
|
Quote:
__________________
Rolex. The Rolex of watches. 16570 Expy2 Noir, 116710 GMT Master II, 2552.80 SMP |
|
7 February 2009, 02:53 PM | #49 |
TechXpert
Join Date: Mar 2008
Real Name: Dal
Location: Seattle
Watch: 168000
Posts: 1,614
|
the only Explorer I like is the creamy beige one.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.