The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 28 August 2019, 04:17 AM   #31
jfmiii
"TRF" Member
 
jfmiii's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Chicago
Watch: 16750/16800/126710
Posts: 1,426
id trade the 520+cash for the 500. but i like daytonas though i dislike the 520.

that being said, id definitely trade a 520 for a blro if you arent felling the 520. just because some random strangers on the internet prefer the 520 doesnt mean you have to.
jfmiii is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 August 2019, 04:24 AM   #32
101031-28
"TRF" Member
 
101031-28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: USA
Watch: 1665
Posts: 4,764
Made that mistake a few times in the past, not doing it again.. Not for a 500, a BLRO or a blue SkyD
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 116520a.jpg (107.1 KB, 127 views)
__________________
He could not just wear a watch. It had to be a Rolex.

Ian Fleming
101031-28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 August 2019, 04:27 AM   #33
othertbone
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2018
Location: Florida, USA
Watch: Rolex/AP/Vin Omega
Posts: 1,972
Quote:
Originally Posted by 101031-28 View Post
Made that mistake a few times in the past, not doing again.. This baby is not going anywhere, not for a 500, a BLRO or a blue SkyD
Looks great! You must have tiny wrists wow. Enjoy it!
othertbone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 August 2019, 05:06 AM   #34
Luther89
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: Italy
Posts: 255
I would possibly do this for the Pepsi but no way in hell the VC. Still have no idea as to why VC is holy trinity
Luther89 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 August 2019, 04:55 PM   #35
bayerische
"TRF" Member
 
bayerische's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Andreas
Location: Margaritaville
Watch: Smurf
Posts: 19,879
If you like the VC then go for it.

__________________
Yeah, well, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man.
bayerische is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 August 2019, 05:31 PM   #36
Seibei
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: New Zealand
Watch: 114060
Posts: 2,630
None of the above. I understand you wanting to change from the Daytona but I am not a fan of your replacements. How about, dare I say it, the Hulk!?!?, or just a Submariner and pocket the difference?
Seibei is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 August 2019, 05:58 PM   #37
Cesarmsi
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: East USA
Watch: Milgauss, GMT, YM,
Posts: 401
A simple NO is the answer!
Cesarmsi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 August 2019, 06:43 PM   #38
Rashid.bk
"TRF" Member
 
Rashid.bk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Dallas
Watch: 12800ft = 3900m
Posts: 11,173
I wouldn't trade. I think the Daytona is quite special in todays times. However, if you just don't like the watch then trade it.
Life's too short to settle.
Rashid.bk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 August 2019, 09:42 PM   #39
ruffa
"TRF" Member
 
ruffa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 726
DO NOT SELL YOUR DAYTONA. I never use the chrono on mine. The BLRO feels like a 9k watch to me. The Daytona makes me happy even though I paid 17.5 for it. I really think you’d regret it if you sold the Daytona for the Pepsi.
ruffa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 August 2019, 05:03 AM   #40
LittleAngelAgnes
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: Palanga
Posts: 14
Please keep Daytona.
LittleAngelAgnes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 August 2019, 06:06 AM   #41
Nikrnic
"TRF" Member
 
Nikrnic's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2017
Real Name: Louis Nick Ric
Location: Michigan, USA
Watch: Blnr, Expll, Subs,
Posts: 10,171
I've always bought for aesthetics over function, if I dont use my Gmt function, so what.. also not a Daytona fan, definitely not a hater it just never did it for me. GMT, Love all Rolex has to offer and own 3 myself. I'd love to see a VC in person, they look beautiful and we know their quality and history are second to none.
Good luck and happy choosing if you decide to make a move..

Sent from my SM-G970U using Tapatalk
Nikrnic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 August 2019, 07:35 PM   #42
watchmaker
TechXpert
 
watchmaker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Scott
Location: London
Posts: 2,242
To the OP: If you aren’t enjoying the Daytona to the extent you though you would (which is very common given how much hype there is about it) I think it makes sense to do a trade for a watch you feel you genuinely want.

Quote:
Originally Posted by athens7 View Post
A chronograph is a quality complication. Are you considering replacing it with a GMT because you travel? If so, ok. If not, you may be replacing one novelty complication with another. If you value complications, a chronograph is generally valued below only a minute repeater and above a perpetual calendar. At the end of the day, most of us only use a three hand watch with a date complication, so anything beyond that is a bit of a conceit (I am guilty of a chronograph conceit). Wear what makes you happy; after all, we can tell time on our phones...
I’m not sure what you have been reading but the chronograph as a complication is not ‘below only a minute repeater’ and is also not ‘above a perpetual calendar’.
watchmaker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30 August 2019, 10:16 PM   #43
zjd168
"TRF" Member
 
zjd168's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: US
Posts: 2,698
blro yes, vc no
zjd168 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 August 2019, 02:53 AM   #44
pigman08
"TRF" Member
 
pigman08's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Real Name: Mike
Location: Tn
Watch: 16610,16710,214270
Posts: 452
Quote:
Originally Posted by watchmaker View Post
To the OP: If you aren’t enjoying the Daytona to the extent you though you would (which is very common given how much hype there is about it) I think it makes sense to do a trade for a watch you feel you genuinely want.

EXACTLY THIS... However, I’d have an extremely hard time paying over MSRP for any current production watch... If you paid MSRP for the Daytona, that should make the premium on your alternative choices a bit easier to swallow... Good luck with your decision!!!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
♛- 16610 (1999)
♛- 16710 (2018)
♛- 214270 (2018)
♛- Yet to be determined, but a white 16520 is on the short list. (I believe that I'll be able to read it better than my old 116520)
pigman08 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 August 2019, 03:37 AM   #45
plainsdrifter
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Real Name: Greg W
Location: UK & USA
Watch: Explorer II
Posts: 87
Don't use the chrono, eh. Don't worry about it. I've had an Explorer ii for over 40 years and have referred to the 24 hr hand half a dozen times.
plainsdrifter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31 August 2019, 05:05 AM   #46
AK797
2024 Pledge Member
 
AK797's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,368
Quote:
Originally Posted by watchmaker View Post
To the OP: If you aren’t enjoying the Daytona to the extent you though you would (which is very common given how much hype there is about it) I think it makes sense to do a trade for a watch you feel you genuinely want.



I’m not sure what you have been reading but the chronograph as a complication is not ‘below only a minute repeater’ and is also not ‘above a perpetual calendar’.
True, but having that world view would be incredible for your collection... always just one trade away from a minute repeater.
AK797 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.