ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
18 January 2020, 12:22 PM | #31 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Real Name: James Cline
Location: san antonio
Watch: 5711 white , 5990,
Posts: 1,218
|
I had a 5167r that I dearly loved. In an moment of weakness I sold it to get another piece. I have been missing it ever since. Never a problem w scratches , it is subtle elegance. I would throw stones at my Rolexes compared to the 67r. To each his own but I vote emphatically for the 67 R .
|
18 January 2020, 12:31 PM | #32 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Real Name: James Cline
Location: san antonio
Watch: 5711 white , 5990,
Posts: 1,218
|
I had a 5167r that I dearly loved. In an moment of weakness I sold it to get another piece. I have been missing it ever since. Never a problem w scratches , it is subtle elegance. I would throw stones at my Rolexes compared to the 67r. To each his own but I vote emphatically for the 67 R . Sorry Jin can’t agree w you on this one ha!
|
18 January 2020, 01:03 PM | #33 |
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 16
|
I've never worn the SS version, but I'm lucky enough to own the 5167R. The dial is striking in sunlight and often catches your eye. Rose gold and chocolate brown pair well together. Wrist presence is remarkable for such a simple, clean dial with an elegant case size. It's the most comfortable watch I own.
I find there's also an attractive incongruity in pairing precious metal with something as casual and functional as a rubber strap. |
18 January 2020, 11:11 PM | #34 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Japan
Posts: 30
|
I own both. The RG is a more beautiful watch imo. I honestly think the two watches can coexist in your collection :) Just get it! You will not be disappointed
|
19 January 2020, 01:59 AM | #35 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,368
|
I would or go for the 5164.
|
19 January 2020, 02:26 AM | #36 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Jorge
Location: Ohio, USA
Watch: Rolex,Patek and AP
Posts: 4,707
|
just saw one of the pics of the 5167R with scratches on the bezel on the first page of this thread and gave me the chills. Never owned the 5167, i would like to believe that its thinness helps with the scratches. I know that I suffer with the 5164R but it is a thicker watch
good luck
__________________
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- "Nothing happens until something moves " Albert Einstein |
19 January 2020, 02:26 AM | #37 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: herts
Posts: 94
|
Let’s not forget the 5164 is a lot more money. The steel version is10k more than the 5167r! That’s a big jump.
And it’s quite a bit thicker. 5167r wears as both sporty and smart too. |
19 January 2020, 02:36 AM | #38 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2019
Real Name: Bill
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,735
|
5167a goes mostly unnoticed except by a WIS. 5167r draws more attention, as does any flash of gold. An all gold Rolex would draw even more attention. It’s a very individual decision to determine which is right for you.
|
19 January 2020, 04:58 AM | #39 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex & Patek
Posts: 1,436
|
I've been considering adding a gold piece this year and the 67r is one that has been discussed. I already own a 67a. My intent was to get a complication, but when the opportunity strikes for an Aquanaut it's really hard to turn down.
|
19 January 2020, 09:21 AM | #40 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,368
|
Their retail prices are fairly similar at £27/8K, grey prices are different but so are many models out of kilter.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.