ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
31 December 2020, 03:29 AM | #31 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: US
Posts: 657
|
|
31 December 2020, 03:30 AM | #32 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 77,815
|
|
31 December 2020, 10:30 AM | #33 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 152
|
Quote:
|
|
31 December 2020, 10:42 AM | #34 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Salem, OR
Posts: 5,390
|
Hello from my '58 5508
|
31 December 2020, 11:41 AM | #35 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: US
Posts: 657
|
Quote:
Congrats on owning one of these special references. That dial looks great, with a later hash insert. Not knowing the first 3 SN’s and judging from the large white lollipop seconds hand, it’s from later ‘56 to early ‘57. To my knowledge, they only had the white lollipop for a very brief period and changed during the latter part of ‘57 to smaller lume circles on the sec hand and from silver no hash tono hash insert. |
|
31 December 2020, 12:42 PM | #36 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Valencia, CA
Watch: GMT Master 1675/3
Posts: 2,186
|
Amazing watches gentlemen!
|
31 December 2020, 01:44 PM | #37 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 152
|
Quote:
|
|
31 December 2020, 03:56 PM | #38 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: US
Posts: 657
|
An ***actually unpolished*** 6536
Quote:
. I’m blessed, fortunate and thankful original owner preserved it in this state. I think the switch was around SN corresponding to a III.57 caseback and perhaps coincided with the change from silver no hash to no hash. That’s just my educated guess. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.