ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
23 August 2022, 10:12 PM | #31 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: usa
Posts: 6,765
|
I don't entirely disagree, but think it has mostly to do with size/proportions. In fact, I feel that way about the majority of 39mm+ Tudors in the brand's multi-size lines (1926, Royal, BB 32/36/41, and BB S&G 31/36/39/41 in particular).
I think I'd like the 1926 in 36mm (though haven't seen one in person), and was surprised by how much I actually liked the Royal in 34 (though I think ideally the former would come in 34, the latter in 36). On the BB side of the house, I think the S&G 36 may be one of the nicest looking TT watches I've ever seen, but the larger ones look huge. |
29 August 2022, 05:07 AM | #32 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Pothole
Watch: Tudor Black Bay
Posts: 890
|
Quote:
No Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Tudor Black Bay Red Rose ETA Rolex 214270 Explorer 1 Tudor BB 41 Blue Dial Doxa Sub 200, SKX009 Aquastar Deepstar |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.