ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
9 January 2023, 10:09 AM | #31 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Family first
Posts: 652
|
No way, no how. Rolex has the Air King and Tudor the Ranger, obviating any need for a 39mm Explorer.
|
9 January 2023, 10:24 AM | #32 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: USA
Posts: 12
|
I would LOVE a return to the 39. Sure there are other models that size, but it seems that’s a sweet spot for folks. Plenty of DJ 36, Cellini, OP 36 out there. Or, they could just release two different sizes and keep the Exp 36, too.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
9 January 2023, 02:20 PM | #33 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Real Name: Keith
Location: NYC
Watch: AK 126900/SM 300M
Posts: 1,664
|
That watch- 39mm Explorer- is now called Air-King. Love it or hate it, I actually think it’s true and intentional on the part of Rolex.
|
9 January 2023, 07:06 PM | #34 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2022
Location: UK
Watch: 124270,16570,P39
Posts: 146
|
|
9 January 2023, 09:51 PM | #35 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: UK
Posts: 2,874
|
Agreed 100%. OK so the 39mm wasn't the historic size, but the proportions of the 39mm were absolutely fine IMO. I would still love to pick up a NOS 214270.
__________________
Rolex - 116710BLNR : 116610LN : 116622 : 116334 : 14060M (Plus - Glashutte Original, Breitling, Omega, IWC, Tag Heuer, Doxa, Sinn, Seiko, G-Shock + micros) |
9 January 2023, 10:29 PM | #36 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: North Carolina
Watch: Rolex/Others
Posts: 47,639
|
Maybe, I would like to see it with the 41mm case.
|
10 January 2023, 06:18 AM | #37 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2019
Real Name: Mark
Location: Southern England
Watch: DJ41 SubC SMP mast
Posts: 1,678
|
Would be good. It’s a much more wearable size for me and having both available is a great idea.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
10 January 2023, 06:23 AM | #38 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Here
Posts: 4,652
|
|
10 January 2023, 08:57 AM | #39 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Michigan
Posts: 4,588
|
|
10 January 2023, 09:04 AM | #40 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Pittsburgh
Watch: 126710BLNR Jubilee
Posts: 7,073
|
It’s funny - I just want looking into the explorer vs OP online. The 36 is not an option for me, looks so small. If they did bring back the 39, that would be interesting.
__________________
126710 BLNR Jubilee |
10 January 2023, 09:10 AM | #41 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: USA
Posts: 332
|
To answer your question: no. Will it come back ever? Hard to tell.
I tried on the 36mm and no way would I get it. It’s far too small and I only have a 7.25” wrist. That bracelet tapers to dental floss width. |
10 January 2023, 01:20 PM | #42 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2014
Real Name: Keith
Location: NYC
Watch: AK 126900/SM 300M
Posts: 1,664
|
|
10 January 2023, 01:23 PM | #43 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2022
Location: US
Posts: 60
|
I think the proper size should be right between 36 (too small) and 39 (too big) for the Explorer. So I vote for 37.5mm too as the ideal size.
|
10 January 2023, 01:37 PM | #44 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: The Sun
Posts: 232
|
They should absolutely bring a 39-40mm version of the Explorer back. Even before the current market craze, I don’t think they had any problems selling the 214270 Mk II version.
|
10 January 2023, 02:47 PM | #45 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 1,793
|
I hope not for selfish reasons...I want mine to continue to go up in value.
It's unique and many agree it is the perfect watch - me included. Thank you for listening and have a good day
__________________
16610 ♛ 16610LV ♛ 214270 MK2 "Life is far too short not to wear a Rolex!" |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.