ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
26 February 2024, 08:30 AM | #31 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2016
Real Name: Rich
Location: Hoboken, NJ
Watch: 116610LN
Posts: 468
|
|
26 February 2024, 09:06 AM | #32 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2019
Real Name: Brad
Location: Purdue
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 9,243
|
They go with your steel watch as part of the value proposition.
__________________
♛ ✠ Ω 2FA Active |
26 February 2024, 09:16 AM | #33 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Midlands, UK
Posts: 4,971
|
By your logic, if you don’t see value in the extra money for the gold, a steel Rolex also isn’t good value.
A Tudor is good value. Many Tudors are exceptional watches. The 54, 58 and pelagos are incredible value for what they are and capable of. So I don’t think it’s a question of value for you, just buy it if you love it. |
26 February 2024, 09:21 AM | #34 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2017
Location: West Side
Posts: 2,711
|
Define value, right? Different scales fit everyone.
Love it? Buy it! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
26 February 2024, 09:24 AM | #35 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: West Coast
Watch: EXP 39, GRNR, SeaQ
Posts: 955
|
It’s not a value proposition, it’s a get what you like proposition. The CHNR is a great looking watch, but do you like it enough to spend the extra $$?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
26 February 2024, 10:06 AM | #36 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: NC
Watch: RG Olive DD40
Posts: 1,794
|
If you are calculating how much gold is in a watch compared to its price, and also figuring out how many stainless watches you could buy for the premium of TT/PM, then you are not ready for anything beyond stainless.
My advice is stick to SS for now because once you go PM it's hard to go back. I have two gold watches that I love (full disclosure--one is on oysterflex haha). Sure I could have 6 stainless watches instead for the same price, but I can only wear one at a time and I've long decided I prefer having a few gold watches over many stainless in my collection. |
26 February 2024, 10:11 AM | #37 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Florida
Posts: 235
|
It’s a terrible value proposition, but they look fantastic! Straight up, most watches over about 300 bucks are a lousy value proposition.
|
26 February 2024, 10:12 AM | #38 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Real Name: Kat
Location: CA, USA
Watch: 126233 Wimbledon T
Posts: 7,137
|
Quote:
Is a Tudor a good value, though? There are plenty of other Swiss brands of high quality for 1-2 grand less than a Tudor.. We pay a premium for Tudor, as well, because of its relationship to Rolex. BTW, I love my BB58. Kat Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk |
|
26 February 2024, 10:24 AM | #39 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 77,829
|
If we really want to go down this rabbit hole … what about hand bags?
How much material $$$ is in an LV or Hermes? The value proposition is in the buyer’s perception. |
26 February 2024, 11:36 AM | #40 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: GA
Posts: 5,037
|
I say just start your own AD. Seems like the best value trend these days.
|
26 February 2024, 11:38 AM | #41 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: The States
Watch: Cosmograph Daytona
Posts: 7,434
|
YG is my fav watch metal to wear.
Also, you are definitely wrong about people with lighter skin not being able to wear YG. I think a lot of people have insecurities about wearing PM. Once you get past that, it’s an amazing ownership experience. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
26 February 2024, 11:58 AM | #42 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Joe
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: Daytona + GMT BLNR
Posts: 4,840
|
I have found the PM pieces I own get the most wrist time. While they were more expensive they are holding their value well. Can’t beat them.
|
26 February 2024, 11:50 PM | #43 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Real Name: Steven
Location: Glocal
Posts: 21,026
|
i believe that is why it is called "luxury". The luxury lifestyle is not for everyone, yet millions do enjoy and benefit from it daily.
__________________
__________________ ----> TAMPA Meetup In December 2024 <---- https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?p=13450519 Love timepieces and want to become a Watchmaker? Rolex has a sensational school. www.RolexWatchmakingTrainingCenter.com/ Sent from my Etch A Sketch using String Theory. |
27 February 2024, 01:15 AM | #44 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2022
Location: Budapest, HU
Watch: 17000B, B+W
Posts: 2,351
|
... and also, I think this might be the best definition of luxury I've ever seen.
|
27 February 2024, 01:39 AM | #45 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: NL
Watch: Yachtmaster
Posts: 14,738
|
I always try to explain that to the Mrs, never succeed
__________________
Day Date 18238, Yachtmaster 16622, Deepsea 116660, Submariner 116619, SkyD 326935, DJ 178271, DJ 69158, Yachtmaster 169622, GMT 116713LN, GMT 126711. |
27 February 2024, 01:42 AM | #46 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 77,829
|
|
27 February 2024, 03:18 AM | #47 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2016
Real Name: Rich
Location: Hoboken, NJ
Watch: 116610LN
Posts: 468
|
Quote:
Putting availability to one side, am i going to love it 60% more than lets say a Batman, or a GMT Coke, if they bring one out? Maybe not. |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.